Select Committee on Health Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 450-459)

TUESDAY 25 MARCH 2003

MS KAREN CONNOLLY, DR TRACY JOHNSTON, MRS ALEX SILVERSTONE, MS ROSEMARY CONNOR, MR ANTONY NYSENBAUM AND MS CLARE HODGSON

  Chairman: We will be going through a similar format with yourselves. We want to cover as many areas as possible but also get into other areas. I am particularly conscious that we did not deal with breast feeding in the last session, so we have to try and sneak that in at some point. Richard will start with data collection.

Dr Taylor

  450. I am not sure if you were all here for the first session but we are trying to find out how data is collected in the various different units, and whether it is still on paper or whether it is on computers, knowing from previous witnesses in previous sessions that it varies tremendously across the country. St Mary's, how do you set about data collection? Is it satisfactory; is it appalling? Tell us about it.
  (Ms  Connolly) We have a comprehensive maternity services information system which was originated in 1987 for one particular consultant; and then it was implemented across the maternity unit in 1997. It collects specific data from the outset of booking, right through to the postnatal period. We do get our annual statistics from that system, and all deliveries are put into the computer and outcomes; so we can get annual reports and monthly statistics. We also have the patient administration system, which collects the episodes of women who come through the service. Only in the last 12 months have the two talked to each other, but only in a minimal way just for the demographic details. We are still having some teething problems, so we are trying to get combined data.

  451. So they only talk to each other in a limited way at the moment.
  (Ms Connolly) Yes.

  452. How old are these two systems, the PAS and your maternity system?
  (Ms Connolly) I could not say how old the PAS system was because it has been there as long as I have been there, for the last twenty years; but the updated version of the computer system for maternity information was updated in 2001, but prior to that in 1997.

  453. You said you have a specific data set. Have you been involved with work on the national data set? Would you support what our last witness has said, that that is one of the strongest needs—a national data set?
  (Ms Connolly) Yes. I have not been involved directly but I would support that because at the moment it is very difficult to compare data from different units if it has been collected in different ways. For example, in recording things like a "born before arrival birth" everybody has different definitions. When you try and compare them you find that they are slightly different, so we do need agreed data.

  454. How often do your systems crash?
  (Ms Connolly) Not very often, I would say. We have a midwife who is responsible for that overall system, and she talks with the company that are based in London. If we do have any problems, we have a help line that staff can ring throughout the day, and also internal systems at night.

  455. Do you keep paper records as well?
  (Ms Connolly) We keep birth registers and individual medical records, but we do not duplicate.
  (Mr Nysenbaum) We have paper records of the birth register that our senior labour ward midwives use to create data—and that has probably been running for ever. We have a computer system that was created internally a couple of years ago as a module of PAS, and it enables us to collect data and to print out maternity discharge summaries, but as yet it has not allowed us to access all the data that we are putting in. We have a shortage of people in the computer department, and prioritisation I am afraid is very low. The first information we extracted off it successfully was yesterday, when I waved the sledgehammer of the Commons Select Committee at the computer department, and they managed to print off how many inductions we had last year. So there is a wealth of information, but we have no means at all of accessing it.

  456. That was purely and simply because you do not have somebody with the expertise to know how to find it.
  (Mr Nysenbaum) Yes, and the funding to pay for it. We have the expertise there.

  457. Does the fact that it is a module of the PAS system itself a good thing?
  (Mr Nysenbaum) I am not sure whether it is a good thing or a bad thing, but it certainly has the information on it, and it appears to be fairly straightforward to access it, if you know how to use it. Certainly within half an hour of asking for some information, it was e-mailed to me. It is clearly there, and it is accessible. I think that every unit must collect the same data, though. It seems absurd that we have hundreds of different systems running.

  458. Do you have your own specific data set?
  (Mr Nysenbaum) Yes, which we created for our own use.

  459. So you would agree that that should be national and it is absolutely obvious that it should have been years ago.
  (Mr Nysenbaum) Yes, absolutely—and it is purely cost that meant we had to develop our own because we could not afford to buy other commercial systems.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 June 2003