Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


APPENDIX 26

Memorandum by Royal College of Nursing (MS 32)

TERMS OF REFERENCE

  The Sub-committee will examine the provision of maternity services, and the variation in service provision, across England. In particular the Sub-committee will consider:

    —  the collection of data from maternity units;

    —  the staffing structure of maternity care teams;

    —  caesarean section rates;

    —  the provision of training for health professionals who advise pregnant women and new mothers.

  The Committee will investigate how staffing levels and training affect both the type of birth a woman is likely to have, and health of her baby in early life.

INTRODUCTION

  With a membership of over 350,000 registered nurses, midwives, health care assistants and nursing students, the Royal College of Nursing is the voice of nursing across the UK and the largest professional union of nursing staff in the world. The RCN promotes patient and nursing interests on a wide range of issues. The RCN Midwifery Society has 1,325 active members.

THE STAFFING STRUCTURE OF MATERNITY CARE TEAMS

  Although steps have been taken to reduce the vacancy rates in midwifery, the continuing shortage of midwives impacts on the level of choice available for women. On a practical level, women are often unlikely to know the midwife who attends their birth and there may be several shift changes during their labour. Midwives are finding that increased workloads due to shortages meant that they have less time to help women with breast-feeding and aftercare. There is scope for care assistants to help with the workload and the skill-mix in midwifery units needs to be reviewed.

  The RCN is calling for an expansion in the provision of midwife-led units (birth centres) and provision of home birth. The Government has stated that women should have the choice to give birth where they want, but this right is compromised by the shortage of midwives. This can result in women who have planned to have their baby at home being informed there are no midwives available to attend and they must to go to hospital.

  Some midwives serve communities where over a hundred languages are spoken. This can present real challenges to providing women with an efficient, high-quality service. NHS translators are scarce and not easily accessible, and can take two weeks to secure. This presents a problem in routine cases and clearly is unacceptable in emergency cases and when complications occur. Midwives sometimes have to resort to asking a family member to translate, which is not ideal as family members are rarely impartial and this can impact on the woman's choice. Further, the additional time spent trying to understand women's needs without the help of a translator impacts on already high workloads. The RCN is calling for cheaper, faster and more accessible translation services to be available to midwives.

CAESAREAN SECTION RATES

  In recent years there has been a marked increase in the number of caesarean sections being performed in the UK. In 1970 caesarean section rates in England and Wales accounted for less than 3% of all births, but by 1997 an Audit Commission report stated that 11-18% of all babies were delivered by caesarean section. More recent figures show that this rate has risen to 30%.

  Caesarean section is not subject to evidence-based criteria, and does not always result in maximum health gain for either women or babies. Although the procedure carries major benefits for some women and children, there are also associated risks, such as increased perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality due to operative injury and the complications of anaesthesia. Post-operative recovery can also be lengthy. The Association for Improvements in Maternity Services (AIMS) suggests that the increased number of caesarean sections directly contributes to the increase number of women having emergency hysterectomies after childbirth.

  There is much evidence to support the normalisation of childbirth, and midwives seek to facilitate informed choice for women and foster a non-intrusive, non-intervention approach to birth for low-risk mothers and their babies. The RCN believes that an expansion in the provision of midwife-led units—birth centres—could help to counter the increasing medicalisation of childbirth. Studies indicate that birth centres lead to the following improvements for low-risk mothers:

    —   Higher normal delivery rates, lower caesarean section rates

    —   Lower forceps and ventouse rates

    —   Fewer inductions

    —   Fewer epidurals

    —   Less pethidine use

    —   Fewer episiotomies

    —   Less electronic fetal monitoring

    —   Fewer amniotomies

    —   Fewer intravenous infusions

    —   Fewer vaginal examinations

    —   Lower incidence of shoulder dystocia

    —   Shorter labours

    —   Less fetal distress

    —   Less difficulty establishing respiration

    —   Increased chance of successful breastfeeding

    —   Increased consumer satisfaction

    —   More appropriate use of midwifery skills

    —   Women / families able to make own birth decisions

    —   Women feel empowered

    —   High midwifery job satisfaction

    —   Cost effectiveness[50]

  An example of a successful midwifery-led service is the Wiltshire Primary Care Trust (WWPCT), which delivers 5,200 women a year. The maternity service is located at seven birthing centres and at a consultant unit where women with more complicated pregnancies deliver. These community-based birth centres are all stand-alone facilities which are midwifery-managed with no medical input, and they extend choice for women who meet the acceptance criteria for birth without intervention. Midwives undertake the antenatal care for those women booked to deliver in the birth centres, and also for those booked to deliver in the consultant unit. The birth centres are the first point of contact for pregnant, labouring and postnatal women across the maternity services as they are open 24-hours a day. All the birth centres have an attached consultant who visits each of the birth centres for consultant clinic on a monthly basis to prevent the women having to travel in to the consultant unit. Should a woman wish to have a home birth, services are provided by her local team of midwives working out of the birth centres.

  The midwives actively encourage non-pharmacological labour care such as massage and the use of water (hydrotherapy units are available at some of the birth centres), enabling women to find their own ways of working through their labour in an active and positive way. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Pethidine and Entonox are available. Epidural anaesthesia is not available in the birth centres, and should a woman decide on epidural anaesthesia she must be transferred to the consultant unit. Midwives rely on clinical judgement to determine when to transfer a woman should she change from a low-risk to a high-risk category. The overall transfer rate is static at 17% for intrapartum, 3% for maternal postpartum and 1% for neonatal reasons.

THE PROVISION OF TRAINING FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

  The increasing unnecessary medicalisation of childbirth due to a false perception that this procedure is less damaging than vaginal delivery mean that fewer midwives have the chance to build up experience of delivering babies naturally. There is a danger that skills will be lost, with fewer midwives having the experience to undertake more complicated procedures confidently, which could ultimately restrict the choices open to women[51]Hunter (2000) describes the range of core skills required by midwives to deliver normal births as:

    —  Confident to provide interpartum care in a low-technology setting.

    —  Comfortable to use embodied knowledge and skills to assess a woman and her baby as opposed to using technology.

    —  Able to let labour "be" and not interfere unnecessarily.

    —  Confident to avert and manage problems that might arise.

    —  Willing to employ other options to manage pain without access to epidurals.

    —  Responsible for outcomes without access to on-site specialist assistance.

    —  Confident to trust the process of labour and to be flexible with respect to time.

  The education needs of midwives operating from birth centres will differ from those of a midwife operating in an obstetric maternity unit. While birth centres deal primarily with women and babies who are healthy, the early identification of ill or at-risk women is essential. All staff working in birth centres must be skilled in basic life support techniques in maternal and infant resuscitation and the management of obstetric emergencies. In the Wiltshire Primary Care Trust, all birth centre midwives are required to attend an Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics (ALSO UK) course, a two-day intensive multi-professional course using workshops and lectures.

CONCLUSIONS

    —  The continuing shortage of midwives is impacting on the level of choice available to women.

    —  Increased workloads due to shortages mean that midwives have less time to help women with breast-feeding and aftercare.

    —  Poor provision of translation services presents a real challenge to providing a high quality service to women.

    —  The increasing rates of caesarean sections carry associated risks of increased perinatal and maternal morbidity.

    —  The increased medicalisation of childbirth means that midwives are losing vital skills and confidence.

    —  An expansion in the numbers of midwife-led birth centres would increase choice available to women.

    —  Studies indicate that birth centres improve delivery for low-risk women.

50 Saunders et al, 2000; David et al, 1999; Feldman and Hunt, 1997; Rosenblatt, Roger et al, 1997; Campbell R, 1997; Spitzer, 1995; Fullerton and Severino, 1992; Anderson RE and Anderson DA, 1991; Albers and Katz, 1991; Rooks et al, 1989; Kucera, 1987; Ernst 1986; Scupholme et al, 1986. Back

51 Rosser, 2001.Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 June 2003