Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


APPENDIX 49

Letter from the Policy Adviser NSPCC to the Chairman of the Committee (MS 62)

  I understand that you are chairing the Health Select Committee's forthcoming Inquiries into the Provision of Maternity Services, Inequalities in Maternity Services and Choice in Maternity Services, and I write about a number of issues which the NSPCC should like the Committee to consider as part of these Inquiries.

  Overall, we should like the Committee to be cognisant of the fact that infants (children under the age of one) are statistically most at risk of abuse and neglect, and also more likely to be victims of homicide than any other group in the population:

    —  At 31 March 2001, the most recent date for which figures are available, there were 4,200 registrations of babies under one on child protection registers. This is the highest rate for any age, three times the average for all ages, and is over 15% of all registrations[74]

    —  One baby is killed every fortnight[75] and infants under one are four times more likely to be killed than any other group in the population, and nine times more likely to be killed than any other age of child.

  This raises important issues for the training and practice of professionals working in the maternity services. The NSPCC's specific concerns centre on the following:

SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME

  Shaking babies causes brain damage resulting in long-term disability and death. This brain damage has been detected in one in 4,000 infants[76] Crying babies are particularly difficult to cope with and mothers and carers may feel inadequate if they are unable to pacify them. The most common reason given for shaking a baby is that "it wouldn't stop crying".

  The NSPCC is concerned that parents do not currently receive adequate advice about the dangers of shaking their baby. We should like all parents of newborn babies to be educated as a matter of routine about appropriate physical handling of babies, and the dangers of shaking them. It would be very helpful to ascertain current practices and arrangements in the maternity services for educating parents about the dangers of shaking.

POSTNATAL DEPRESSION AND SUPPORT FOR NEW PARENTS

  Postnatal depression is experienced by 12-15% of mothers[77] and may affect the development of secure attachments between a baby and their mother, with significant longer-term consequences, both for their relationship and for the child's emotional and cognitive development[78] It is important that midwives and health visitors should be able to identify and respond to postnatal depression, yet a clinical review in the BMJ in 1998 found that postnatal depression is commonly missed by primary care teams, despite the fact that reliable detection procedures have been developed[79] The same review found that antenatal personal and social factors were most relevant to the development of postnatal depression in mothers, and that effective prevention interventions should be developed.

  However, there are indications that support for new mothers is diminishing. The number of postnatal home visits by midwives and health visitors has declined by a quarter in the last decade[80] An NSPCC survey of 2,100 people who had recently had babies found that 46% of them did not feel they had enough support in times of stress. Of those who suffered—or whose partner suffered—postnatal depression, 52% felt they did not get enough extra support from health professionals[81]

  We are concerned that universal health and support services, such as health visiting, should continue to be a priority, and that services should be adequately staffed and should aim to support parents and promote helpful, non-violent parenting practices, as well as babies' healthy physical development. A survey of the mothers of one-year-olds found 75% had already hit their children. Fourteen per cent of these incidents were classed as being more than "mild"[82]

  There is much anecdotal evidence, from the experience of our own services and from others, that the government's targeted initiatives, such as Sure Start, are drawing key staff, such as midwives and health visitors, away from core universal services. This is of great concern to us, as in effect it means a reduced service to parents who do not receive the targeted service, with implications for their needs for advice and support, and their babies' needs for safe and appropriate care and protection.

ANTENATAL CARE AND EDUCATION CLASSES

  We are concerned that here should be effective outreach services to reach parents, especially mothers, who are not attending routine antenatal appointments and classes. Their lack of engagement with services does not necessarily mean they do not need support—in fact they may be in greater need of such support, and require more individual help with their situation. Engaging with such parents is obviously important for the healthy development of their babies, both before and after birth. In some areas, antenatal health visiting takes place, so that health visitors are able to identify and work with mothers who need extra support, which in turn is beneficial for their babies.

  The NSPCC believes that antenatal classes should include more advice and information for prospective parents on the emotional aspects of having a new baby, the importance of bonding and attachment, and coping with the challenges that such a life change presents.

TRAINING

  It is clearly crucial that all health professionals working with children and their parents should be fully trained in understanding, preventing, recognising and reporting child maltreatment in accordance with the recommendations of the Victoria Climbié Inquiry[83] and government guidance contained in Working Together to Safeguard Children[84]

  As further background information I enclose a copy of "Setting the Context", the first chapter of the Reader that accompanies our Fragile: Handle with Care—Protecting babies from harm training resource for health professionals, together with our leaflets for professionals and parents about protecting babies and positive parenting.

  I hope this material is helpful for your Inquiries. Please don't hesitate to contact me if we can provide you with other relevant information or be of further assistance.

4 March 2003

74 Based on most recent national figures: England: Children and Young People on Child Protection Registers in England, Year ending 31 March 2001, Department of Health, 2001; Northern Ireland: Key Indicators for Personal Social Services for Northern Ireland, DHSSPSNI, 2001; Wales: Local Authority Child Protection Registers: Wales 2001, National Assembly for Wales, 2001) Back

75 Criminal Statistics: England and Wales 1999 (2001). London: TSO. Back

76 Jayawant, Rawlinson, Gibbon, Price, Schulte, Sharples, Sibert, and Kemp, Subdural haemorrhages in infants: population based study; British Medical Journal 317, 1998. Back

77 Cox, Murray, Chapman, "A controlled study of the onset, duration and prevalence of Postnatal Depression" Br J of Psychiatry 163, 1993. Back

78 Cooper, Peter J. and Murray, L. Postnatal Depression. British Medical Journal (1998) 316 1884-1886 20 June. Back

79 Ibid. Back

80 Community Maternity Services Summary Information for England 1999-2000, Department of Health, 2000. Back

81 NSPCC Survey conducted May 2000. Back

82 Smith, A Community Study of Physical Violence to Children in the Home and Associated Variables, 1995. Back

83 The Victoria Climbié Inquiry (2003). London: The Stationery Office. Back

84 Working Together to Safeguard Children (1999). Department of Health, Home Office, Department for Education and Employment, Home Office. London: The Stationery Office.
Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 June 2003