Select Committee on Health Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 18

Memorandum by Dr Beng Goh (SH 30)

1.  SUMMARY

  Prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STI) including HIV is being undermined by the rapid increase in STI and HIV and inadequate resources to cope with the crisis. This led to longer waiting time for patients to be seen with the potential for further spread of infection by untreated patients and serious complications arising such as pelvic inflammatory diseases, sterility and ectopic pregnancy as well genital cancers and HIV related complications. The opportunity to prevent unwanted pregnancy is missed as patients who had STI had unprotected intercourse and therefore liable to get pregnant. Substantial resources are required to maintain the success of GUM services over 60 years. Immediate remedial action should be taken to ensure that current GUM services do not deteriorate further and waiting time should be kept to a minimum to prevent the transmission of STI/HIV.

2.  THE EVIDENCE

  2.1  The local GUM services are at crisis point. North Thames carries a disproportionate burden of STI and HIV patients within the United Kingdom. The increasing HIV workload in many parts of North Thames is siphoning resources from traditional GUM services into HIV. The current GUM services in North Thames are finding it extremely difficult to cope with the needs of patients. The huge demand has resulted in a waiting time of six weeks for an appointment in some clinics. Patients had to shop around other nearby clinics for shorter appointment date and those who cannot wait then attend walk-in services. Clinics with a walk-in services are inundated with patients from elsewhere who were seen on the same day but had to wait for more than four to five hours to be seen.

  2.2  Patients particularly young people including adolescents in Inner London have high rate of gonorrhoea and chlamydial infection which can lead to chronic pelvic pain, sterility and ectopic pregnancy. This has significant psychological and physical morbidity with huge financial implications when it could be prevented in the first place. The abortion rate among young women in Inner London is amongst the highest which again is preventable.

  2.3  Health promotion and screening of STI lead to more workload and contact tracing/partner notification of sexual partners, being an integral part in the prevention of STIs, further aggravate the burden in GUM services, a "catch 22" situation. Currently there is a health promotion campaign by Terence Higgins Trust targeting gay men in London to get screened for syphilis as the outbreak of syphilis in gay men in North Thames is continuing unabated.

  2.4  Staff have had to work late beyond their contracted hours on a regular basis which has lead to poor staff recruitment and retention. The response of clinics with walk-in services, which used to be the norm, is to "gate control" patients by limiting the number of patients seen each day, the rest being sent away while others clinics are moving to appointments only, leading to long waiting list, thus aggravating the situation further. This situation is completely against the fundamental objective of reducing STIs/HIV and unwanted pregnancies.

  2.5  There are many single-handed consultants in North Thames, which is unsafe for clinical governance as patients lack proper cover when the consultant goes on leave. The increasing HIV workload with the increasing complexities in the management of HIV infection has magnified the GUM workload in all the GUM Clinics, more so for single-handed consultants.

  2.6  North Thames has large ethnic population eg Bangladeshis, Indians, Turkish and African communities. Ethnic populations take longer time for consultations and frequently need language line and interpreters/health advocates, which are often not available. Health promotion material on sexual health in ethnic languages is also lacking.

  2.7  Sexual assault cases are on the increase in Inner London and are seen by GUM clinics for STD/HIV screen and psychological support which aggravating the excessive GUM workload.

  2.8  With the introduction of oral treatment for erectile dysfunction, more men are accessing GUM Clinics for psychosexual services as the services are viewed by patients as confidential and user friendly. Psychosexual problem is a neglected area particularly when funding is concern and many patients continue to suffer in silence. Where psychosexual services are available in North Thames, they contribute to the excessive workload in the GUM clinics.

3.  RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTIONS

  3.1  Urgent injection of substantial financial resources to:

    (a)  Increase manpower to shorten waiting time for patients to be seen to not more than two weeks for those with appointment clinic. Financial incentives should be given to provide more staff for "walk-in" clinics where patients are seen immediately and to reduce the waiting time to be seen to less than three hours.

    (b)  Fund new diagnostic tests such as genetic probes for chlamydial infection which increase the detection rate.

    (c)  Fund HIV management and treatment adequately so that resources are not siphoned off other essential GUM services.

    (d)  Increase contraception services within GUM clinics to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

  3.2  Sustainable Health Promotion campaigns following the increased provision of GUM services.

June 2002


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 11 June 2003