Select Committee on Health Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 19

Memorandum by Dr B P Goorney (SH 31)

  I wish to submit evidence indicative of poor commissioning and clarity over the development of the Genitourinary Medicine service in Salford from a part-time clinic to full-time consultant led service.(I am currently single handed and have clinics at other sites in Manchester). Overall the delay and low priority afforded this hard pressed service has resulted in an undeveloped and overstretched local GU service dealing with increasing demand of core sexually transmitted diseases.

Paragraph 1

  In August 2001 a bid for Consultant expansion for Salford and neighbouring Trafford GUM clinics was documented by the commissioning body at the time Salford and Trafford Health Authority. The monies amounted to £110,000 to include support staff in addition to 1.0 whole time Consultant in Genitourinary Medicine.

  This bid was accepted as a result of a strong business case submitted by myself and colleague in neighbouring trusts over two years ago.

  It was based on the increasing clinical demand on our services in Salford, unacceptable waiting times, (currently four weeks) and catchment population served (240,000), in addition to pressures of influx of asylum seekers, large university student population, and Manchester Syphilis outbreak.

Paragraph 2

  Several meetings with Hospital senior and middle management confirmed their interest in this post following confirmation of the monies in 2001as a result of our bid.

  However now almost a year later, we seem to be still no further forward in developing this post, and in the meantime we have been transferred to inferior clinic premises within the hospital from previous purpose built facilities.

  The excuses given for this unacceptable delay is due to the devolvement from a single health authority to three separate Primary Care trusts representing commissioners for both Salford and neighbouring Trafford. Another reason given is the implications of the National Strategy for Sexual Health and the need to redesign the delivery of our services.

Paragraph 3

  I feel all this protracted process to implement a full time Consultant led service, has adversely affected and undermined our ability to provide a quality sexual health service to meet the rising demand of sexually transmitted diseases.

  It would appear that with the current organisational change in the NHS my specialty is increasingly seen by commissioners as low priority, with no sense of urgency.

  At the last correspondence I had with the hospital trust general manager for medical services he states "It is an utter disgrace that this matter has still not been resolved".


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 11 June 2003