Select Committee on Health Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 23

Memorandum by Dr Helen Lacey (SH 38)

  I have been a consultant in GUmedicine for 10 years and work single handed in Rochdale and Bury to provide sexual health services to a population of <400,000. I am supported by two assistant doctors and a team of nurses.

  Despite instituting efficiency measures we are finding that in the past 12 months demand for the services far exceeds supply and we have a three week waiting list for appointments. A recently presented audit of GUM services in the North-west commissioned by the regional health authority also concluded—"demand for services significantly outstrips supply, problems around access will understate the need for GUM services, the rising trend in STIs will exacerbate access to GUM services, many GUM staff work beyond contracted hours and have limited opportunities for training". Disappointingly—no action plan has been suggested to address these problems.

  Manpower—in my post—one consultant: 400,000 population—recommended ratio—from Royal college of physicians one: 100,000 population. Many GUM consultants have no junior doctors in training to support the clinical workload and rely on non career grade Drs (rather poorly paid) to do much of the clinical work. Most of us now find it impossible to recruit suitable candidates even if we are successful in attracting additional resources. I advertised a full time post recently—a national advert—one unsuitable applicant!

  I find I am doing more and more of the sort of clinical work that should and could be undertaken by a junior grade doctor. Consequently I have less time to do all those "extras"—audit, appraisal, education etc.

  So what about nurses taking on some of the more traditional Drs roles?—recruitment to the higher grades of nurse has been difficult and applicants for a nurse consultant post disappointing. The funding arrangements for HIV treatments put pressure on GUM drug budgets. Money does not follow these patients but goes preferentially to the big centres making it difficult to offer local services even where the expertise exists. If this situation continues it will be difficult for me to continue to offer HIV treatment services and I will have to send my patients to the big centres—it does not take long for a clinician to become deskilled in this area of medicine. Years to train—and about 12 months to become deskilled!

  Despite all the publicity about increasing STIs, despite all the hype about the sexual health strategy , the specialist services that manage these problems are understaffed, under resourced and becoming increasingly overburdened and demoralised. We now have major staff recruitment and retention problems which mean that consultants are doing inappropriate tasks for their skill levels.

  The evidence is quite plain—outbreaks of gonorrhoea and syphilis locally—high levels of teenage pregnancy and chlamydia. How much more evidence is needed to convince those who can make changes that the sexual health of the population is deteriorating? I despair at the lack of interest and knowledge about sexual health service commissioning shown amongst local PCTs. I was able to offer a better STI service to local people when I took up my GUM post 10 years ago.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 11 June 2003