Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Annex A

UK OBJECTIVES AT THE 2003 ANNUAL MEETINGS OF THE WORLD BANK AND THE IMF

  The Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Secretary of State for International Development will attend the International Monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC), the Development Committee and the Annual Meetings of the IMF and World Bank on 21-24 September in Dubai. The Chancellor (the UK Governor of the IMF) chairs the IMFC, and as UK Alternate Governor for the IMF, the Governor of the Bank of England represents the UK at the IMFC. As UK Governor of the World Bank, the Secretary of State for International Development will represent the UK at the Development Committee.

UK Objectives for the International Monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC)

  The proposed agenda for the IMFC includes: the Global Economy and Financial Markets, outlook, risks and policy responses, including the Doha Development Agenda; strengthening crisis prevention, including enhancing the effectiveness of IMF surveillance and promoting policy reforms for improving resilience to crises in industrial and developing countries; progress with crisis resolution initiatives; and accelerating poverty reduction and strengthening sustainable economic growth in low-income countries. For this last item, Ministers will consider the IMF's role in low income countries, the Poverty Reduction and Strategy Paper (PRSP) approach and the Heavily Indebted Poor countries (HIPC) initiative. In addition, the IMFC will receive progress reports on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism, IMF quotas and governance, and the Activities of the Independent Evaluation Office.

THE GLOBAL ECONOMY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS

  The IMFC will discuss the outlook for the global economy, the prospects for a gradual recovery and the potential risks and vulnerabilities. Ministers will wish to identify the appropriate policy responses, including the right combination of monetary and fiscal policy, the necessary structural reforms, and the steps needed to strengthen the global financial system. The UK will want to emphasise that all continents need to play their part in order to achieve a sustainable, broad-based global recovery. We will also emphasise the contribution of trade to global economic growth in the medium term in all countries, developed and developing, and vital importance of bringing the Doha Trade Round to a conclusion on time.

CRISIS PREVENTION

  We will again emphasise the central importance of improving the effectiveness of crisis prevention, including enhancing the transparency, authority and independence of the IMF's surveillance process. We will welcome the work which is already underway to strengthen IMF surveillance and the "fresh perspective" initiative in programme countries, as well as steps underway to improve transparency of Fund documents. We will seek to encourage greater take-up and more effective follow-up of the standards and codes initiative, and seek to ensure that the ongoing review of the Contingent Credit Lines (CCL) finds ways to achieve the CCL's original objectives, in particular providing incentives for good policy making.

IMPROVING CRISIS RESOLUTION

  We will stress the importance of the involvement of the private sector in the prevention and resolution of financial crises, and the importance of implementing the IMF's procedures and criteria regarding exceptional access to Fund resources. We will want to see continued progress in the use of Collective Action Clauses (CACs) in international sovereign bond contracts, and also welcome work under way towards the development of a voluntary code of good conduct. We will also want to ensure that the IMF continues to pursue its work programme on the issues relevant to the resolution of crises.

INITIATIVES TO SUPPORT LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES

  We will reiterate our firm commitment to the Millennium Development Goals, and the key role of the IMF in helping to achieving them. The UK will want to establish the principles of the Fund's engagement in low-income countries over the medium term. In addition, the UK will be emphasising the need for:

    —  better alignment of the PRGF with PRSPs;

    —  early IMF engagement in the PRSP process and macroeconomic dialogue; and

    —  improved use of poverty and social impact analysis in programme design.

  We will also continue to emphasise the need for a broader approach to financing the Millennium Development Goals to ensure longer-term debt sustainability in HIPCs, and for further progress in the Enhanced HIPC Initiative, including further assistance from the Fund and the Bank in helping countries overcome the obstacles and delays in reaching Decision and Completion points. We will stress the importance of sufficient topping up at Completion Point, the importance of full creditor participation, and action to tackle HIPC to HIPC debt and address creditor litigation. We will also seek to take forward the issue of strengthening developing country voice, an issue that will also be considered in detail at the Development Committee. We will stress the urgent need to find ways of raising additional finance in order to meet the Millennium Development Goals by 2015. We will be seeking Ministers' support for the establishment of a multi-nation Working Group that will examine options for making the International Finance Facility a reality.

OTHER ISSUES

  The UK also welcomes the progress made by the IMF and World Bank on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism, and will seek continuing efforts, in cooperation with the FATF, regional bodies and UN bodies, on the pilot project of assessments and the delivery of technical assistance.

  We look forward to progress reports on IMF quotas and governance and the activities of the Independent Evaluation Office.

UK Objectives for the Development Committee

  This Autumn's Development Committee has three main themes: Supporting Sound Policies with Adequate and Appropriate Financing; Enhancing Voice and Participation of Developing and Transition Countries; and a Progress Report on Trade. In addition, papers will be received on: Implementation Report of Policies, Actions and Outcomes Needed to Achieve the MDGs; Progress on the Implementation of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs); Progress on the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Debt Initiative; and the World Bank Group Infrastructure Implementation Action Plan, for comment in Ministerial statements. The Chancellor and Secretary of State will submit a joint written statement to the Development Committee setting out UK views for the discussion.

SUPPORTING SOUND POLICIES WITH ADEQUATE AND APPROPRIATE FINANCING

  We welcome the World Bank paper estimating the additional financing required by individual countries to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). We particularly support the findings that current levels of aid are insufficient to meet this challenge and that there is an urgent need to find ways of increasing available resources both in the medium and longer-term. The UK's proposal for an International Finance Facility (IFF) seeks to bridge this financing gap and we are seeking support for the establishment of a multi-nation Working Group that will examine options for making the IFF a reality. We will be promoting an ongoing role for the Bank in monitoring financing shortfalls at the country level and offering guidance to donors in ensuring that global aid allocation patterns do not leave individual countries lacking appropriate levels of financing. We will also be pressing the Bank, in making allocations, to pay sufficient attention to the balance between poverty and performance in each borrower member country.

  Rising levels of development finance will heighten the importance of increasing aid effectiveness. Donors' behaviour will need to improve, with particular emphasis on increased alignment behind country poverty reduction strategies and harmonization of practices with other donors. A greater share of resources will also need to be provided in a form that is untied, predictable and able (where appropriate) to finance recurrent costs. The IFF can make a significant contribution to this objective, since it would provide immediate, predictable finance in grant and concessional loan form and encourage greater donor co-ordination. Developing countries will need to implement further reform in the governance and accountability of public institutions, and show leadership in encouraging donors to align their programmes with poverty reduction strategies. We will be urging the Bank and other stakeholders to implement fully the commitments they have made in these areas.

ENHANCING VOICE AND PARTICIPATION OF DEVELOPING AND TRANSITION COUNTRIES

  We welcome the paper outlining initiatives currently under way to enhance developing and transition countries' participation in the decision making process of the Bretton Woods Institutions (BWIs). We also welcome the paper's recognition that Voice is a long-term agenda that will require continued effort over time on a range of issues. We look forward to further mainstreaming of the Voice agenda in the work of the BWIs, and will press for a formal progress report to the Annual Meetings in 2004.

  On capacity building, we endorse the progress that has been made in strengthening Executive Directors' offices, but will also emphasise the need for this to be sustained. In particular, we will seek formal endorsement from Governors on the establishment of an Analytical Trust Fund to facilitate independent research and policy advice for developing countries' Executive Directors at the Bank and the Fund, and will press other donors to join us in making a financial contribution to this Fund. We also believe that action can be taken within the institutions themselves to increase developing country voice. We will press Managements to produce a short report on actions they are taking in both the Bank and Fund to strengthen the Voice agenda. This should focus, in particular, on issues of diversity, transparency and decentralisation, and on other issues identified by developing country members.

  In relation to IDA, we will request Bank Staff to take urgent action to enhance the role of borrowers in the IDA-13 Mid-Term Review and in the IDA-14 replenishment negotiations. Further thought should also be given in the context of these negotiations to options for maximising take-up of IDA subscription votes.

  On structural issues at the Board level, we will reiterate our belief that a 25th seat (for Sub-Saharan Africa) on the Boards of the IMF and World Bank would be an important means of increasing the effectiveness of developing country representation and should be seriously considered, and our belief that there should be an increase in the Basic Vote as part of any future revision of the Articles of Agreement. We will also emphasise that progress on these issues is essential if we are to deliver on our Monterrey commitments.

PROGRESS REPORT ON TRADE

  We welcome the expansion in both depth and scope of the World Bank's trade programme over the past few years. In particular, there have been significant efforts with others to ensure that trade-related capacity building activities are supporting national development programmes. This is absolutely essential in helping countries exploit new trading opportunities and should remain a priority for the World Bank in the future.

  More generally, the UK is working hard to help ensure a successful outcome at the 5th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organisation in Cancun. This must include significant progress on issues of high priority to developing countries, namely agriculture and special treatment for different countries. It is also critical that we develop a trade agenda, within the context of national development plans, which addresses developing country concerns raised during the WTO's Doha round of trade talks in November 2001. We welcome the recent joint initiative from the Bank and the Fund to help the weakest and most vulnerable countries adjust to trade liberalisation. This should help them cope with potential negative impacts of reform such as preference erosion and loss of tariff revenues. We will urge the Bank and the fund to work more closely with the WTO, UNDP, UNCTAD and donors to set out the details over the coming months.

IMPLEMENTATION REPORT OF POLICIES, ACTIONS AND OUTCOMES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE THE MDGS

  We welcome the progress made in developing the global monitoring framework of policies and actions needed to achieve the MDGs. We also broadly support the outline for the first Global Development Review to be presented to the Development Committee next Spring. However, we will emphasise the importance of ensuring that this Review contains clear operational recommendations to ensure a successful discussion at the Spring Meetings. We will also call for continued close collaboration with other development partners in the production of the Review. With regards to the monitoring of developing country policies, we will highlight the importance of using PRSPs and PRSP annual reports in order to ensure that assessments are embedded in country owned processes. We will also welcome the work under way in monitoring IFI policies and will press for assessments of aid quality—particularly progress on PRSP alignment and donor harmonisation and coordination—to be included in this monitoring process.

PROGRESS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PAPERS (PRSPS)

  We welcome the joint World/Bank IMF paper on progress in implementation of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers, which provides a comprehensive review of the major issues involved in PRSP implementation. We also welcome the recognition of the need to address tensions in the PRSP process, make greater progress on alignment and harmonisation and strengthen participatory processes. We look forward to the next PRSP progress report, which we hope will contain an additional focus on the Bank and Fund's progress in supporting the PRSP process. In particular, we will be encouraging the Fund to engage early in the PRSP process and support governments in their macroeconomic dialogue with civil society and donors. We will also emphasise that we would like to see more details about the Fund's work on Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA), within its areas of competence. We will also be encouraging the Bank to undertake further work to strengthen PRS monitoring processes, which are a key element to embedding the PRSP in national policy making processes.

PROGRESS ON THE HEAVILY INDEBTED POOR COUNTRIES (HIPC) DEBT INITIATIVE

  The UK would like to resolve the issue of the calculation of debt relief at HIPC Completion Point, in order to ensure that the additional relief provided by some bilateral creditors is truly additional to any `topping up' of debt relief. The UK is also keen to press forward with the implementation of the HIPC Initiative, and we are seeking an analysis of the reasons for delays in some countries reaching their Decision and Completion Points, as requested by the G8 at Evian. We hope that this will stimulate debate about what more can be done to speed up implementation.

  The key issue for the UK, however, is how to ensure longer-term debt sustainability in HIPC countries. This means developing new forward-looking financing strategies to provide countries with the support they need to meet the MDGs in a way that does not risk undermining their debt sustainability in the longer-term. We hope that discussion at the Annual Meetings will give a clear direction to this debate, so that solutions can be identified by the time of the 2004 Spring Meetings.

  However, debt relief alone, no matter how generous, cannot guarantee long-term debt sustainability. We cannot achieve the Millennium Development Goals without greater aid resources.

WORLD BANK GROUP INFRASTRUCTURE IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN

  The UK welcomes the Infrastructure Action Plan. We believe the plan is well balanced and realistic. The UK's objectives are to ensure that the Bank's drive to increase expenditure on infrastructure services is achieved without returning to indiscriminate project lending. Maintenance and management must receive as much emphasis as the installation of capacity. Lending must not displace private sector funding where this is a credible alternative (indeed, any lending should be part of a policy to develop sustainable markets)—and institutional support including capacity building must be completely integrated into investment programmes.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 12 February 2004