Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by the Department for International Development, in response to further questions from the Committee

  1.  Does the UK Government support the establishment of a Multistakeholder Review of private sector participation in water and sanitation?

  DFID has been invited and will participate in the scoping study for the Multi-stakeholder Review of Private Sector Participation.

  The private sector, at local, national and international level, has an important role to play in the delivery of water and sanitation services, although there has been some recent controversy around international private sector participation in water and sanitation.

  DFID is working to encourage partnership between national and local government, civil society and the private sector through initiatives such as Business Partners for Development, to identify common ground between government, industry, community leaders, trade unions and non-governmental organisations in the development of appropriate mechanisms for improving access of the poor to water supply and sanitation.

  2.  What is the UK Government doing to ensure that countries such as Niger and Honduras, which have good donor-approved education plans but which have missed out on the Education For All Fast Track Initiative, are not denied the financial support which they need to make improvements to their education system?

  The UK Government is committed to making the Fast Track Initiative work. Although UK support for education will continue to be provided through our country programmes rather than through a separate FTI contribution, we will continue to support the FTI to accelerate progress towards the education MDGs, particularly now that the priority of the country-led sector development process has been accepted. DFID will continue to focus on its priority countries for its bilateral commitment. Support for poverty elimination and Education For All goals in other countries will be provided through our contribution to multilateral funds.

  The UK is attending an FTI Partners' Meeting in Oslo on 21-22 November. Discussion there will focus on ways to provide financial support to donor orphan countries such as Niger and Honduras. One such proposal is the establishment of an FTI Catalytic Fund. This is currently supported by four FTI donors (The Netherlands, Norway, Italy and Belgium). The objective of the fund is to ensure that all countries have the possibility to begin scaling up progress towards Universal Primary Completion, by providing transitional funding for FTI-endorsed countries which do not have a strong donor presence. Although the operating rules of the Fund are still being finalised, the Fund is intended to "crowd in", rather than crowd out, other donor support, by providing bridge financing for a finite number of years. However, outcomes of the Oslo meeting will not be fully established until mid-December.

  3.  What is the likely impact of the Basle II Capital Accords on developing countries' access to finance, and might they be revised so as not to unduly discourage lending to developing countries?

  The Basel Accord is a non-binding agreement between G-10 bank supervisors and central banks that formulates broad supervisory standards and guidance for internationally active banks. The FSA and the Bank of England represent the UK in Basel. Discussions on the design of a New Accord are continuing and the finalisation of Basel II is expected no later than mid-year 2004. The new Basel Accord will be implemented in Europe through a new Capital Adequacy Directive, CAD3.

  The overall impact of Basel II on lending to developing countries will depend on a large number of factors, including how banks respond to the New Accord. However, it is not clear at this stage that the proposals will damage the provision of finance to developing countries in aggregate. The proposals will improve on the current regime by aligning regulatory capital charges more closely to risk which should provide a better basis for sustainable lending. They will also remove the current bias towards short-term lending to developing countries, and towards lending to lower credit rated OECD sovereigns rather than to higher rated sovereigns outside the OECD.

November 2003





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 12 February 2004