Select Committee on International Development Second Joint Report


7  ADMINISTRATION OF THE LICENSING SYSTEM

176. The export licensing system is necessary in order to ensure that strategic exports do not reach undesirable end users. In most cases, the system seems to have produced the right decisions. As mentioned above, we have discovered what we consider to be occasional failures by officials to carry out basic checks. More importantly, we have identified shortcomings in the Government's information systems.

177. The licensing system also has a significant regulatory impact on industry. This cannot be avoided, but every effort should be made to ensure that the system imposes no unnecessary or excessive burdens.

178. Each Government Department involved in the licensing process, the DTI, the FCO, the Ministry of Defence and the Department for International Development had a target in 2001 of 10 working days for processing licence applications.[205] The DTI met this target in 80 per cent of cases in 2001, a slight improvement on the previous year. However, the performance against this target of the other three Departments deteriorated in 2001 as against the previous year, with each meeting the target in only about 50 per cent of cases.[206] For the consideration of appeals, while all the cases considered only by the DTI were processed within the 15 working day target, none of the cases circulated to other Government Departments were completed to schedule. When we asked the Government why service had deteriorated, it was explained to us that:

    service is not always reflected by the headline performance target ... Because of the way performance is measured, clearance of long standing cases (which entails factoring into the performance statistics of the longer processing times for these cases at the time they are finalised) has the effect of reducing the overall performance figure, even if performance on other applications is as good or better than for previous accounting periods. Thus, the greater the number of long standing cases finalised in a given period, the worse the overall performance figure is likely to be. Similarly the target does not take account of fluctuations in the volume of applications received.[207]

179. If improvement in service can make the headline performance figure look worse, then the obvious conclusion is that the performance targets are not working as they should. We are pleased that this is also the conclusion that the Government seems to have reached. As the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry told us:

    In the past our performance has not been as good as it should be. What we have done, not just within my Department, but the Foreign Office and MoD as well, is to look over the last year at how we can make the whole process more efficient. Inevitably there is a lot of to-ing and fro-ing between different government departments and the Foreign Office and posts abroad, and that is where a lot of the delays come from. We looked at how we can make it more efficient and we have also made a huge effort to deal with the backlog of cases that had arisen. We used to have 104 cases that were over 12 months old, which, not surprisingly, gave rise to a great deal of frustration and anger in industry. We now have no cases over 12 months old, and we are working to get it down to deal with the ones that are between 6 and 12 months old now. I would be very concerned, indeed, if we found ourselves back in that situation with a lot of backlogs of applications. By going through this very careful process of working with industry to understand how we enforce this in the simplest possible way and concentrate our efforts on where there are real problems and on the minority of people who are deliberately flouting the law, seeking to do things we do not want them to do, then we can prepare our own system and resources and make sure that we do not end up with that backlog building up again.[208]

180. We understand that a Government-wide review of the licensing process is currently taking place and that it is expected to report later this year.[209] We look forward to seeing the results of this review.

181. It seems odd timing to conduct a major review of the licensing system just before it is overhauled by statute. New controls will shortly be introduced under the Export Control Act 2002. We are considering these separately.[210] The administration of these new controls will be a significant extra burden on the machinery of Government. We conclude that the introduction of new controls under the Export Control Act will be a major test of the efficiency of the licensing regime—a test that the Government must not fail if it is to maintain the confidence of industry.



205   Licences circulated to other Government departments were therefore subject to a target of 20 working days in total. Back

206   2001 Annual Report, pp 365-366 Back

207   Ev 33 Back

208   HC (2002-2003) 620, Ev 29, Q 166 Back

209   HC (2002-2003) 620, Ev 29, Q 166-167 Back

210   HC (2002-2003) 620 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 20 May 2003