Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


3.  Memorandum submitted by British Geological Survey

NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE REBUILDING OF IRAQ: A SUBMISSION BY THE BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

  1.  The British Geological Survey (BGS) is the UK national geological survey and a component institute of The Natural Environment Research Council. This document mainly addresses three of the topic headings referred to in the briefing notes:

    —  the state of civilian infrastructure, especially water and electricity supplies

    —  availability of resources

    —  reconstruction needs

THE NEED FOR KNOW-HOW

  2.  Geological knowledge underpins construction and development. In Britain, geological understanding fuelled the development of the industrial revolution by aiding the discovery of raw materials and at the same time ensuring that transport infrastructure developed to keep pace with the needs of industry. Today, the use of geological data and associated knowledge is often unobserved but ensures that we are able to plan and regulate building; remediate brownfield/contaminated land; assist in the sitting and predict the behaviour of waste disposal sites and civil engineering projects; protect and regulate groundwater resources in terms of quality and quantity; and assist in predicting the impacts of sea-level rise, landslides, agriculture and climate change.

  3.  It is similarly true today that geological knowledge and data must necessarily form an important part of any post-conflict work in Iraq because, as stated by Pekka Haavisto, the chairman of the UNEP desk study on the environment in Iraq "Many environmental problems in Iraq are so alarming that an immediate assessment and a clean-up plan are needed urgently. The environment must be fully integrated into all reconstruction plans if the country is to achieve a strong and sustainable recovery"

  4.  The UNEP report stresses the need for urgent measures to address humanitarian issues and sets priorities as being:

    —  restoring the water supply and sanitation systems

    —  cleaning-up possible pollution "hot spots"

    —  cleaning-up waste sites to reduce the risk of disease epidemics from accumulated municipal and medical wastes.

    —  conducting scientific assessment of sites struck with weapons containing depleted uranium (DU).

    —  Distributing pamphlets immediately to military and civilian personnel, and to the general public, on how to minimise the risk of accidental exposure to DU.

  5.  In addition to these immediate priorities, UNEP highlights the need to integrate environmental protection into the wider post-conflict clean-up and reconstruction process. In the words of UNEP Executive Director Klaus Toepfer: "Environmental protection is a humanitarian issue: not only do environmental hazards threaten human health and well-being, but they can impede aid operations." Recommendations include conducting environmental impact assessments; applying environmentally friendly technologies for major reconstruction projects; and maximising the exchange of information between key stakeholders to avoid accidental further risks to human health and the environment.

THE NEED FOR AN IRAQI GOVERNMENT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FUNCTION

  6.  Regulation of the natural environment and its exploitation are vital elements of good governance. It is especially important in developing and post-conflict countries where there often is a strong economic and social dependence on natural resources. In most countries, a geological survey is the agency of this regulatory function. It underpins and enables development to ensure environmental sustainability in areas of:

    —  Water quality (especially locating and protecting groundwater for drinking)

    —  Industrial and domestic waste disposal (including prevention of groundwater contamination from untreated sewage)

    —  Food security and quality

    —  Industrial minerals (aggregate and cement materials for domestic rebuilding)

    —  Land management

    —  Urban Development  

  7.  The geological survey function of government involves both information (data) and know-how (skills). In Iraq, a good deal of the information has been destroyed or lost, and many of the skilled staff are gone or need retraining. Institutional strengthening of the Iraq Geological Survey (IGS), to enable it to fulfil its important role, is urgent. In the present situation in Iraq, an efficient IGS is needed to ensure:

    —  Export earnings to help pay for the reconstruction.

    —  The integration and dissemination of environmental and contextual data to planners and NGOs.

    —  Domestic consumption, especially building materials, water supplies and power generation and for social development/good governance in a sustainable and environmentally aware manner.

    —  The provision of employment, especially for young workers.

    —  Maintenance of human health particularly the poor and disadvantaged.

    —  Protection of the environment and natural heritage of Iraq.

    —  Sustainable development of agriculture.

WHY CAN'T THE PRIVATE SECTOR (EG OIL OR MINING COMPANIES) DEVELOP THE RESOURCES?

  8.  There is common misconception that the private sector can manage the exploitation of natural resources. Whereas the role of companies is important (eg in mineral extraction), control and regulation of this sector must remain a responsibility of government, viz:

    —  The management of water resources, especially in an arid environment is of fundamental importance to health, agriculture and industry. Without regulation, the indiscriminate drilling of boreholes and over-abstraction can quickly result in permanent damage to the aquifer and derogation of existing supplies. Care is also needed to prevent aquifer contamination through inappropriate siting of boreholes (eg near to chemical plants, sewage plants).

    —  Resource development is often a balance between the conflicting interests of companies, who want easy and fast returns, and the nation, which needs sustainable and environmentally sensitive developments that maximise the benefits for the common good. In most countries this is achieved through licensing and permits awarded to companies by the state, usually on the advice of its geological survey organisation. Such advice requires a basic knowledge of the resource potential and the environment, its use and sensitivities.

    —  Mineral resources can contribute significantly to the local and national economy, foreign revenue and employment. But in order to attract investment, and compete with other countries in the global marketplace, it is essential to promote the sector by making available basic geological and environmental information, and providing an efficient state interface to the commercial sector and NGOs participating in the reconstruction effort.

    —  Licences and permits are awarded and monitored according to geological, social, environmental and legal factors, ensuring that the state receives a fair return through royalties or taxes. Mining and petroleum laws and a fair/efficient fiscal regime are clear examples of some of the regulatory tools required during the post reconstruction period.

WHAT COULD HAPPEN IF POORLY REGULATED DEVELOPMENT IS ALLOWED TO TAKE PLACE AS AN EMERGENCY MEASURE?

  9.  Some of the likely consequences of unregulated development are:

    —  The unsustainable practices of the past will continue, leading to widespread pollution and destruction of the natural environment on which sustainable livelihoods depend.

    —  Inappropriate mining can pollute the environment, including surface and sub-surface water, and damage the health of workers and of the surrounding communities.

    —  Groundwater resources can quickly become depleted, polluted or contaminated. This can happen when well-meaning, but technically uniformed, NGOs or charitable organisations take only a local rather than a regional view.

    —  Valuable reconstruction funds will be wasted on the development of inappropriate and unsustainable technologies

    —  Effects of pollution from domestic, industrial and military will continue to impact on the environment and human health, and without prompt appropriate action these impacts will cause irreversible damage to groundwater and agriculture.

WHERE DOES THE BGS FIT IN?

  10.  The British Geological Survey is well placed to assist for a variety of technical and political reasons:

  (a)  technical:

    —  BGS has the experience and skilled staff to support a policy of data recovery, institutional strengthening though training, technology transfer and provision of advice in the rebuilding of the Iraq Geological Survey.

    —  It is widely perceived as one of the leading national geological surveys with a reputation for impartiality, confidentiality, reliability and value for money.

    —  Despite the important contribution that BGS can make towards humanitarian relief through economic development, water supplies, waste disposal, contaminated land, employment, social order, good governance, environmental sustainability, and economic growth, current DFID policy appears to remain intractably opposed to this sector, possibly as a consequence of lack of proper understanding of the role of geoscience.

    —  BGS continues to have a significant impact both at an international level through the WHO and Royal Society and a more local level through the MOD on the study of the environmental fate and health issues associated with the use of Depleted Uranium. Our applied scientific contribution to this issue in Iraq would greatly benefit from the support of other government Agencies such as DFID and the MOD.

  (b)  political

    —  BGS (through NERC) is a non-Departmental Government Body and hence would be seen to be acting directly in a HMG support capacity

    —  BGS has links with the United States Geological Survey (USGS) who would appear to be eager to work with us. However, in the absence of UN involvement, and hence World Bank funding, BGS cannot participate as it is not eligible to receive USAID funds

    —  BGS has historical, professional links with several Iraqi geologists and is likely to be more acceptable to Iraqi sensitivities than other nations' geological surveys, not least because of recent and on-going BGS work in Jordan, Palestine, Morocco, Mauritania and the UAE.

  However, BGS cannot participate without identified UK Government (DfID) financial support.

WHY NOT LEAVE THIS TO THE USA?

  11.  A "stand by and watch" policy is likely to have the following consequences:

    —  As things now stand, it is likely that the USGS will act alone, funded by the US Government or through USAID. The risk is that USGS solutions might favour US oil, mining and water industries by adopting a "US-friendly" set of codes and regulations.

    —  Whilst a strong base of Iraq public-good lies in the development of natural resources, if the balance of advantage is perceived to favour US companies' interests, credence could be given to the claim that the war was motivated by oil interests, with obvious reputational damage to HMG.

    —  Longer term scientific and technical relationships between UK institutions, industry and universities and the Iraq oil, minerals and water sectors would be impaired. We can be fairly sure that non-UK/US geoscience organisations for example those of France, are waiting in the wings to "advise and assist" Iraq in support of national interest to their industries and educational/research organisations.

BACKGROUND NOTE ON BGS

  12.  BGS is the oldest national geological survey in the world, founded in 1835, and is widely respected for its excellence, impartiality and professionalism. It has worked in over 90 (mostly developing) countries. BGS has extensive experience in all the fields mentioned in this memorandum.

  13.  BGS is part of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) which reports through the Office of Science and Technology to the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). BGS receives approximately 50% of its operational funding through the Science Vote, but its overseas work relies entirely on other sources of funding, such as DFID, the World Bank and the EU. Funding from DFID has declined dramatically in recent years as its policy objectives have moved away from supporting geoscience development in developing countries.

  14.  Further information on BGS activities and capabilities can be obtained from David Ovadia, Director of International and Corporate Development, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG. Telephone 0115 936 3465, fax 0115 936 3474, e-mail d.ovadia@bgs.ac.uk The BGS web site is www.bgs.ac.uk

29 May 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 15 July 2003