Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by Surveyors and Valuers Accreditation Ltd (DHB 34)

  1.  Surveyors and Valuers Accreditation Ltd (SAVA) is a standards setting body for practitioners undertaking surveys and valuations, mainly in the residential property sector.

  2.  The organisation was established in 1999, and has, since that time, set benchmark standards to which all residential surveyors who subscribe must work.

  3.  SAVA is grant funded by the former DTLR and now the ODPM to undertake the essential research necessary to ensure that a robust and consumer conscious report and licensing framework can be established for the planned Home Condition Report part of the improvements to the homebuying process.

  4.  SAVA's representations relate solely to matter relating to the Home Condition Report and the certification scheme to support it.

  5.  The research undertaken by SAVA has been assisted by a Steering Group of industry and consumer representatives, and the detailed requirements have been broken down into 6 working groups, also made up of consumer and industry representation together with specialist advice as and where required. A list of the bodies represented on the Steering and Working Groups is at Annex 1.

  6.  The research has helped formulate future thinking on protecting the consumer, and some the research results are listed in these representations

7.  THE HOME CONDITION REPORT

  The recommended report is designed to assist all those who read it to find their way through it with ease. It is intended to be transparent, informing the reader in clear unambiguous terminology what the report is designed to achieve, how far the inspection goes and what is not included.

  It adopts a simple rating system that enables readers to focus on those defects at the property that are either serious or urgent, whilst also setting out the actual condition of each of the elements or parts of the property.

  Electronic production and delivery of reports is expected to prevent delay in marketing property. This type of electronic reporting is already available and is being used in some of the voluntary "home information pack" initiatives being undertaken around the country. It is well received, consistent, easy to follow and jargon free.

8.  PROTECTING THE CONSUMER

  Research into the most appropriate means of providing protection for the consumer is well advanced. The following recommendations are made

  All Home Inspectors will be licensed. To achieve a license they will:

    —  have achieved a vocationally related qualification (VRQ) at the same level as NVQ level 4. This will include completing an assessment programme, undertaking a number of inspections, and successfully completing a final test.

  (The qualification is described by some academic institutions as being at a similar level to a foundation degree.)

    —  Conform to a code of ethics and conduct, which deals with:

      —  Maintenance of knowledge levels.

      —  Conduct as a home inspector.

      —  Disclosure of appropriate convictions.

      —  Disclosure of complaints and claims.

      —  Complaints handling requirements.

      —  Maintenance of indemnity insurance.

  Home Inspectors will be required to renew their license at regular intervals, probably every three years.

9.  SOURCING HOME INSPECTORS AND TRAINING

  Home Inspectors will come from a range of backgrounds. The principle of "it does not matter where you start, its where you finish that counts" is being adopted in the quest for the relevant pool of potential home inspectors.

  To date, many professional and trade bodies (see Annex 2) have identified the interest of their members in undertaking the essential training to become home inspectors and look at the opportunity as a means of widening their skills and business base.

  It is estimated that some 7,500 home inspectors will be required, some working full time, others working as part of another role. For those with existing experience in similar work, training will be limited to updating their skill base and locking on any new features of the HCR that they have not previously undertaken, such as collecting information for the production of an energy assessment. For those who come to this new role from related backgrounds or with no experience at all the training time will be longer, and in some cases in excess of two years. A mapping exercise of all appropriate existing qualifications will be undertaken.

  Universities and colleges are keen to provide the required range of training products. (See Annex 3).

  Substantive research on the sources of future HIs is due for completion before the end of May 2003, however we have confidence from the initial feed back that an adequate number of home inspectors will be found and can be trained in time for the mandatory introduction of HCRs.

10.  INDEMNITY INSURANCE

  Indemnity insurance for surveyors and valuers, along with other professionals, has become increasingly difficult to obtain, and substantial rises in premiums are matched by even larger rises in the uninsured excess to be paid by the insured. These excesses are now a minimum of £5,000 and frequently £10,000 or more.

  Research undertaken by SAVA Ltd reveals that "condition related claims" average under £2,000 in settlement (excluding legal and claim handling costs). Effectively providing Professional Indemnity Insurance via the existing route with excesses of £5,000 plus would provide little protection to the consumer.

  Further research shows that a "self managed indemnity fund", paid for through a charge per report and administered through the Home Inspectors Certification Scheme, with claims being determined either via an independent assessor or ombudsman or through the traditional litigation route is a sustainable alternative, which will give a better deal to both the consumer and the home inspector.

11.  CONSUMER TRUST FOR A HOME CONDITION REPORT

  It is presently estimated that some 22% to 25% of homebuyers commission a survey on their purchase. The remainder rely on the lender's valuation, or nothing at all. Lenders do not always provide their clients with a copy of the valuation (C&G have operated a non-disclosure policy for many years), and there is a trend for this practice to expand, particularly with new methods of desktop valuation being developed.

  Buyers will be better informed about the property they hope to buy, and have greater information than they presently receive. The argument that buyers will not trust a report prepared for a seller has to be addressed, and SAVA Ltd undertook research at the Property Show, at Excel, on March 1-3 2002.

  Face to face interviews were held with home buyers and sellers. Some 202 interviews were undertaken and 150 of those interviewed had previously sold or bought a house before.

  One of the questions asked was "If the seller provided a Home Condition Report and you knew that the home inspector was responsible to you, the buyer, for it's content, would you be prepared to rely upon it?

  The responses were

  Yes—127 (84.7%)

  No—12 (8.0%)

  Don't know—11 (7.3%)

  These figures are similar to those published in late 2002 by Yorkshire Bank.

  The balance of the results of these interviews is at Annex 4

12.  CONCLUSION

  SAVA is confident that the Home Condition Report and the Certification Scheme for Home Inspectors will provide consumers with a valuable and reliable product, upon which they will come to rely. The Certification Scheme will be robust and transparent and as a result of starting with a clean sheet, it is entirely practical to focus both the report and the support for it on entirely up to date ideas and technology, free from the trappings of previous survey products.

Annex 1

LIST OF BODIES REPRESENTING CONSUMERS AND INDUSTRY PARTICIPATING IN THE WORK OF THE STEERING AND WORKING GROUPS

  Consumers Association;

  Law Society;

  Council of Mortgage Lenders;

  Council for Licensed Conveyancers;

  Association of British Insurers;

  Property Services National Training Organisation;

  Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors;

  National Association of Estate Agents;

  Chartered Institute of Building;

  Association of Building Engineers;

  Institute of Maintenance and Building Management;

  British Institute of Architectural Technologists;

  Royal Institute of British Architects;

  Institute of Civil Engineers;

  Institute of Structural Engineers.

Annex 2

PROFESSIONAL AND TRADE BODIES THAT HAVE MEMBERS WITH POTENTIAL INTEREST IN BECOMING HOME INSPECTORS

  Association of Building Engineers;

  British Institute of Architectural Technologists;

  British Institute of Facilities Management;

  British Pest Control Association;

  British Wood Preserving and Damp Proofing Association;

  Chartered Institute of Building;

  Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers;

  Construction Industry Standards Council;

  Construction Industry Training Board;

  Federation of Building Specialist Contractors;

  Federation of Master Builders;

  House Building Federation;

  Housing Potential (UK) Ltd;

  Institute of Clerks of Works;

  Institute of Housing;

  Institute of Management and Building Maintenance;

  Institute of Revenues Rating and Valuation;

  National Association of Estate Agents;

  National Federation of Builders;

  National House Building Federation;

  Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors;

FURTHER ORGANISATIONS TO BE APPROACHED FOR FUTURE INVOLVEMENT

  Association of Consultant Building Surveyors;

  Association of Planning Supervisors;

  Association for Project Management;

  Institute of Construction Management;

  Local Government Technical Advisers Group;

  Royal Society for the Promotion of Health;

Annex 2

UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES CURRENTLY RESEARCHING THE PROVISION OF HOME INSPECTOR TRAINING:

  University of Central England—Birmingham;

  University of Western England—Bristol;

  South Bank University—London;

  Sheffield Hallam University—Sheffield;

  John Moores University—Liverpool;

  University of Westminster—London;

  Anglia Polytechnic University—Chelmsford.

Annex 3

QUESTIONNAIRE USED AT THE PROPERTY SHOW—EXCEL—MARCH 2002

  202 interviews undertaken

  Have you bought and sold a home before? Yes 150, No 52.

  Approximately how long did the transaction take?
  Less than 1 month   2
  1—2 months22
  2—3 months37
  3—4 months39
  4—6 months25
  Over 6 months15



  Did you find the experience more stressful than you had expected?
Yes—79No—65 Not sure—2



  Were you satisfied with the process?
Yes—60No—78 Not sure—6



  Did you have a mortgage?
Yes—129No—16



  Did your lender give you a copy of the mortgage valuation?
Yes—88No—37



  Do you feel that the mortgage valuation provided adequate information about the condition of the property?
Yes—23No—105



  Did you or will you have a private survey undertaken?
Yes—101No—41



  Do you think it is a good idea to have all the information on a property you wish to buy up front?
Yes—145No—2 Not sure—3



  If the seller provided a Home Condition Report, and you knew that the Home Inspector was responsible to you, the buyer, for its content, would you be prepared to rely on it.
Yes—127No—12 Not sure—11




 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 12 June 2003