Select Committee on Public Accounts Twenty-Fourth Report


2. Assessing the means of applicants

10. In its 1996 Report on Civil Legal Aid Means Testing our predecessor Committee endorsed improvements in arrangements to verify the means of applicants for civil legal aid. When an application for legal aid is made, the Commission is obliged to serve notice on the other party in the case. The number of representations contesting eligibility for support, usually made by the other party, has fallen from 18,000 in 1996-97 to 5,800 in 2001-02. The Commission therefore considered that the current assessment procedures were screening out a larger proportion of ineligible applicants leading to the decline in representations received.[10]

11. The Commission's Special Investigations Unit, comprising 13 staff, investigates the applications for legal aid when significant issues about eligibility are raised, particularly in costly cases. In 2001-02, the Unit concluded full investigations into 150 civil cases, of which 85% led to the refusal or withdrawal of funding or to an increase in contributions payable by the applicant. Three successful prosecutions for false disclosure had been made in the previous year. Where information on fraudulent claims might be relevant to other agencies, for example the Benefits Agency, the Commission said that it was bound under the Statute of Confidentiality not to disclose information about legal aid applications to third parties. The Lord Chancellor's Department suggested, however, that recent legislation would now allow disclosure where there was suspicion that an offence may have been committed.[11]


10   Q 153; C&AG's Report, para 2.20; 25th Report from the Committee of Public Accounts, Civil Legal Aid Means Testing (HC 314, Session 1995-96) Back

11   Qq 147-148, 150; C&AG's Report, para 2.22 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 20 June 2003