Select Committee on Work and Pensions Fourth Report


DISCRIMINATION

88. There is general agreement[58] that discrimination from potential and current employers is a major issue for people with disabilities and health problems. The disability organisations who gave written and oral evidence to the Committee were unanimous that discrimination plays a large role in the employment prospects of disabled people. They also argued that employers have pre-conceived ideas and make incorrect assumptions about disabled people's capabilities which plays a key role in hindering their employment. Those people with so called "hidden" disabilities and mental health problems can face a particular kind of prejudice and lack of understanding. This can lead them to not admitting they have an illness when applying for jobs for fear of the discrimination they will face, or in hiding their illness from an employer until it is too late for any remedial action or redeployment.

89. Employment opportunities for disabled people have to be backed up by civil rights. The implementation of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) in 1996 and the creation of the Disability Rights Commission (DRC) in 2000 are welcome steps which have made significant strides forward in tackling workplace discrimination. In 2004, the DDA will be extended to cover physical access to service providers and the small employer exemption will be ended. In addition, the disability provisions of the EU Article 13 Employment Directive will come into force in 2004.

90. The Committee welcomes the strengthening of employment rights for disabled people which the extension of the DDA in 2004 will bring. We also welcome the commitment to implementing the disability provisions of the EU Article 13 Employment Directive.

Disability employment tribunals

91. Between 1996 and September 2000, nearly 9,000 disability discrimination claims have been lodged with the employment tribunals. The success rate of those cases decided by tribunals is 19.5 per cent,[59] compared with 16 per cent of race discrimination cases and 65 per cent of redundancy claims.[60] Ms Gooding of the DRC points out that a large proportion of the remaining 80.5 per cent of cases are settled at a much higher rate than sex or race cases, which is a positive sign.[61]

92. Although the DDA is broadly welcomed by all those giving evidence, there are mixed views as to whether it has been a success so far. Organisations such as RNID, Mencap and Mind believe that the impact of the DDA has been limited. Taking a more positive stance, Ms Gooding of the DRC said, "It has had a positive impact. We have seen a reduction in the unemployment rate in disabled people and I hope that is in part due to the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA). We also see evidence of people being able to use successfully the DDA not just in winning tribunals but in terms of negotiating before getting to that point...We are able to use the DDA to negotiate with employers and get the help that is needed. For those people who have heard of it and who are able to use it, it is good. We also have evidence that employers are beginning slowly to change their practices and it is beginning to filter through, but there are shortcomings." [62]

93. Mr Purton of the TUC followed by saying that the law should be seen as a lever and a minimum standard of what employers should be expected to do.[63] This then helps to change perceptions of disability and the culture of employing disabled people.

Lack of employer awareness of the DDA

94. It is apparent that levels of ignorance about disability and employers' responsibilities under the DDA are of real concern. Recent research commissioned by the Department found that 75 per cent of employers had heard of the DDA. However the research also found that 59 per cent of employers did not know if the employment provisions applied to them and only 26 per cent correctly knew whether the provisions currently applied to them.[64]

95. Ms Simkiss of RNIB suggested that it would be helpful to employers and disabled people if the publicity for the DDA also included the promotion of the Access to Work scheme.[65] This would help to alleviate the fear that employing disabled people is costly to employers while funds can be drawn from the Access to Work scheme.

96. Increasing awareness of disability issues and the legal requirements under the DDA are crucial if disabled people are to receive equal employment opportunities. However, as well as the need for an information campaign to promote awareness of the DDA, the use of positive images of disabled people and the creation of role models and champions is advocated by many. We recommend that the DWP work with the DfES and Government Information Service to ensure that a positive perception of disabled people is widely promoted.

The business case for employing disabled people

97. A range of organisations, such as the RNID, the RNIB and the DRC, who gave evidence during the course of inquiry, do valuable work with employers to raise awareness of disability issues and provide advice on the DDA. A point made by these organisations, and one which was also put strongly by the Employers Forum on Disability, is that the business case for employers, especially for small businesses, needs to be clarified and publicised particularly in light of the lifting of the small employer exemption in 2004.

98. The Employers Forum on Disability was critical of the approach, which they believe to be widespread, where those working with disabled people stress the moral and legal obligation to coax employers to employ people with disabilities. They go on to suggest that these practitioners find it hard to promote the business case, "Now that disabled people are in 'the mainstream' that is, at the heart of the Government's Welfare to Work strategy, anyone dealing with employers on behalf of disadvantaged jobseekers must be confident in the business case for employing disabled people and be fully au fait with the range of services, supports and interventions which make it easier for employers to offer disabled people jobs."[66]

99. Mr Purton of the TUC, in highlighting the importance of the business case said, "We understand that if you simply use the law as a threat, you are not really challenging people's perceptions. You want people to enthusiastically embrace the case for employing many more disabled people: that is the objective we all want to achieve. The business case is made, but it does need to be made more strongly and more consistently." [67]

100. There is concern that too much emphasis is being placed on the moral and legal aspects of employing disabled people. We recommend greater effort is put into promoting the business case for employing disabled people, especially for small and medium sized businesses.

Suggestions for improving and strengthening the DDA

101. Awareness raising is an important tool in improving employment rights for disabled people, but many organisations also argued for improvements to the DDA as a further requirement. Most organisations who commented on the DDA gave several suggestions for improving it. We set out the main suggestions in the following paragraphs.

102. Several organisations[68] suggest that the DDA has had little impact on recruitment. Just 9 per cent of disability employment tribunal employment cases are based on recruitment, the remaining 91 per cent are dismissal and reasonable adjustment cases.[69] This is because it is very difficult to prove discrimination at the recruitment stage.

103. Criticising the problems with the definition of disability under the DDA, Ms Gooding of DRC said, "The biggest reason for failure is that in over a quarter of cases... the person has not shown that they are disabled under the Act. They have not got past that first hurdle. I know of a case that took five days in deciding whether a person had a mental illness, depression or not. We do not think that that is a very good way to run a discrimination law."[70] Mr Purton of the TUC went on to argue the absurdity of a law which means that employers can acknowledge that they have discriminated, but, because the person is not disabled under the definition of the DDA, they are not protected.

104. Another common criticism, for example from the mental health organisation Mind, was that the requirement that mental illness has to be 'clinically well recognised' is unfair as it is a hurdle that people with other disabilities do not need to surmount.[71]

105. The Committee is concerned that the definition of disability under the Disability Discrimination Act could be preventing many people from using the provisions of the Act. We urge the Government to work with the Disability Rights Commission and other disability organisations to review the definition to ensure that people who are genuinely disabled can be protected by the Disability Discrimination Act.

106. The Committee welcomes the Government's commitment to civil rights for disabled people and hopes that the momentum continues apace. The next few years will bring several key legislative changes, including the planned Disability Bill, which we hope will make a real difference to the employment opportunities of disabled people. The ending of the small employer exemption and the exemption of excluded occupations is welcome, as is the intention to place a duty on public bodies to promote equality of opportunity for disabled people. We strongly urge the Government to ensure that all of these extensions of rights for disabled people will be widely publicised to employers and the general public. Awareness-raising is crucial to their success.


58   Qq 66 - 72, 117, 162 Back

59   Sarah Leverton (2002) Monitoring the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (Phase 2), Department for Work and Pensions In-house Report 91 Back

60   Ev 119, para 14 Back

61   Q169 Back

62   Q 162 Back

63   Q 166 Back

64   Stuart N, Watson A, and Williams J (2002), How employers and service providers are responding to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, DWP In­house report 96 Back

65   Q 74 Back

66   Appendix 37, para 2g and 5b Back

67   Q 181 Back

68   Q 73 (Mr Lamb), Ev 9, Ev 42, Ev 121 Back

69   Sarah Leverton (2002) Monitoring the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (Phase 2), Department for Work and Pensions In-house Report 91 Back

70   Q 172 Back

71   Q 77 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 11 April 2003