Select Committee on Work and Pensions Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 28

Letter to the Clerk of the Committee from Rehab UK (EDP 37)

Dear Mr Moon,

  I had hoped that we might prepare a formal note for the Committee to consider in its inquiry on "Employment for All". But in the last three months it has been necessary for us to apply ourselves to planning to maintain our services to the exclusion of all else.

  Rehab UK concentrates on the vocational training of people with brain injury and since we started, has succeeded in placing some 70% of our clients in paid, full-time employment from our Centres in London, Birmingham, Newcastle upon Tyne and Manchester. The Centre in Manchester closed in 2001 because of lack of statutory support and our pre-occupation at the end of last year was trying to assure the future of the remaining Centres. In 2002 we had budgeted for an excess of expenditure over income of some £600,000 and were prepared to meet that. However, in August 2002, it became clear that the shortfall was to be some £400,000 larger mainly because of expected support from statutory sources failing to materialise.

  Throughout its existence, Rehab UK has accepted that the first years would not meet the costs, but it expected that over the years the shortfall would reduce. It has become obvious that however we negotiate, however we introduced new statutory and other lines of income, conflicting interests and, in some cases, a refusal to accept responsibility seems to assure an annual deficit of £1 million. The Board of Rehab UK consider that this is no longer acceptable or practical. I enclose various documents circulated over the recent months, letters to and replies from government Ministers, which demonstrates our aims, how they will benefit disabled people and the economy in general. [21]

  I think that all this refers to point five of your inquiry "Are the needs of particular groups of people with disabilities adequately catered for". Our answer has to be that they are not. The concern expressed by members of both Houses in their questions, etc. demonstrates this and the letter to me from the Minister for Work and Pensions of December 2002[22] shows that there are no apparent plans to provide additional funds to meet the needs.

  I hope that you find the information useful and I apologise for not providing a formal submission. I am sure you understand our problems.

George Wilson

Chairman

8 January 2003


21   None of these documents are printed. Back

22   Not printed. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 15 April 2003