House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2003 - 04
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 

 




LORDS non-insistence and Amendments in lieu of a lords

amendment to the

planning and compulsory purchase bill

[The page and line references are to HL Bill 10, the bill as first printed for the Lords.]

Clause 1

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 3

Page 1, line 11, at end insert—

 

“(3A)   

The RSS must include sub-regional plans for all parts of the region in

 

accordance with geographical boundaries defined by the RPB.

 

(3B)   

The sub-regional plans referred to in subsection (3A) shall be prepared by

 

the authorities falling within section 4(1) if their area or any part of their

 

area is in the defined sub-region.”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON

 

The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following Reason

3A

Because it is not appropriate to create more than one tier of regional spatial strategy.

 

LORDS INSISTENCE AND REASON

The Lords insist on their Amendment 3 to which the Commons have disagreed, for the

 

following Reason

3B

Because regional spatial strategies should be based on the views of local communities.

 

COMMONS INSISTENCE AND REASON

The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendment 3, for the following

 

Reason

3C

Because it is not appropriate to create more than one tier of regional spatial strategy.

 
Bill 10653/3

 

(  2  )

 
 

LORDS NON-INSISTENCE AND AMENDMENTS IN LIEU

3D

The Lords do not insist on their Amendment 3, in respect of which the Commons have

 

insisted on their disagreement, but propose the following Amendments 3E to 3J to the Bill

 

in lieu of Amendment 3

3E

Page 2, line 40, at end insert—

 

“( )   

The advice mentioned in subsection (1) includes advice relating to the

 

inclusion in the RSS of specific policies relating to any part of the region.”

3F

Page 3, line 33, at end insert—

 

“( )   

the desirability of making different provision in relation to different

 

parts of the region.”

3G

Page 3, line 38, at end insert—

 

“(4A)   

If the RPB decides to make different provision for different parts of the

 

region the detailed proposals for such different provision must first be

 

made by an authority which falls within section 4(2).

 

(4B)   

But if the RPB and the authority agree, the detailed proposals may first be

 

made—

 

(a)   

by a district council which is not such an authority, or

 

(b)   

by the RPB.”

3H

Page 6, line 11, leave out from “followed” to “section” in line 12 and insert “for the

 

purposes of”

3I

Page 6, line 42, after second “revision” insert—

 

“(a)”

3J

Page 6, line 42, at end insert—

 

“(b)   

of the RSS as it relates to any part of a region.”


 
contents
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Revised 12 May 2004