4 Dec 2003 : Column 65WS
Written Ministerial Statements
Thursday 4 December 2003
CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT
Government Indemnity Scheme
The Minister for the Arts (Estelle Morris): The provision for the Government Indemnity Scheme is made by the National Heritage Act 1980. The scheme facilitates public access to loans of works of art and other objects for public display made to museums, galleries and other such institutions by private owners and non-national institutions. It does this by indemnifying lenders against loss or damage to their loan. Loans covered by the scheme must be for public benefit. The scheme also covers loans of such objects for study purposes within borrowing institutions where this would contribute materially to the public's understanding or appreciation of the loan. Examples of this are enhancing interpretation or explanation to the public of objects or bringing into the public domain, the conclusions of any study.
In the six month period ended 30 September, the following undertakings to indemnify were given under section 16 by the relevant Departments for objects on loan to national and non-national institutions. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport issued 610 undertakings, the Scottish Executive Education Department issued 232 undertakings and the National Assembly for Wales issued 241.
The value of contingent liabilities in respect of undertakings given at any time under section 16 and which remained outstanding as at 30 September for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport are £2,954,237,461. The value of section 16 contingent liabilities as at 30 September for the Scottish Executive Education Department are £695,960,679 and £67,838,929 for the National Assembly for Wales.
The value of non-statutory Government indemnities to cover loans handled by the Government art collection and which remained outstanding as at 30 September are £4,500,000. The value of non-statutory undertakings given to Her Majesty in respect of loans from the Royal Collection and which remained outstanding as at 30 September are £170,694,295.
CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS
Court Service Business Plan for 2003–04
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs (Mr. Christopher Leslie): The following table sets out the targets that have been set for
4 Dec 2003 : Column 66WS
the Court Service for 2003–04. Copies of the Court Service Business Plan for 2003–04 has been placed in the Libraries of both Houses.
| Headline Targets | Target 2003–04 |
|---|---|
| To support Local Criminal Justice Boards (LCJBs) in meeting their targets, including: | |
| reduction of Crown Court ineffective trials, contributing to an overall national reduction from 24% to 17% by March 2006; | 4% reduction |
| the percentage of Crown Court defendants and appellants whose cases are heard within target time; | 78% |
| the period from charge to sentence for Persistent Young Offenders; and | 71 days |
| increasing sitting days in the Crown Court, facilitating the increase in the number of crimes for which an offender is brought to justice to 1.2 million by 2005–06. | 101,500 sitting days |
| Increase year on year the level of satisfaction in four key areas of service delivery. | To increase:Knowledge of court staff at the public counter. |
| Knowledge of court staff on the telephone. | |
| Speed of resolution of complaints. | |
| Helpfulness of written replies. | |
| The percentage of Public Law Children Act cases dealt with within 40 weeks (from commencement to disposal). | 70% of cases dealt with within 40 weeks. |
| The proportion of asylum cases to be cleared through decision and appeal. | 60% of cases dealt with within target. |
CABINET OFFICE
Autumn Performance Report
The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Mr. Douglas Alexander): I have today published the Cabinet Office 2003 Autumn Performance Report. Copies of the report have been placed in the Libraries of the House.
WORK AND PENSIONS
Employers Liability Compulsory Insurance
The Minister for Work (Mr. Desmond Browne): On 3 June the Government published its First Stage Report into Employers' Liability Compulsory Insurance. In response to problems for business caused by rapid increases in premiums for this insurance, the report analysed the nature of the difficulties within the Employers' Liability Compulsory Insurance (ELCI) market, the causes and their impact on business. It identified an agenda for action committing Government to work with stakeholders to bring about improvements. Government promised to report on progress in the autumn.
4 Dec 2003 : Column 67WS
I am pleased to announce the publication of the report that meets that commitment. I have arranged for copies of the report to be placed in the Library. This second and final report describes the work that has been undertaken since June, identifies the further actions we intend to take and sets these in the context of a strategic approach aimed at improving the efficiency, sustainability and outcomes of the Employers' Liability Compulsory Insurance system.
The First Stage Report contained some difficult messages: that there were no quick solutions; that premiums had been held artificially low prior to recent rises and that the current levels of premiums were reflecting the true economic costs of accidents, injuries and ill health in the workplace. However, it also recognised that the pricing behaviour within the market meant that far too many businesses, quite out of the blue, had faced acute price increases; late renewals and premiums that often have not reflected individual health and safety efforts. The market has not failed but in many instances it is simply not working well enough.
So, as the report demonstrates, the Government are acting. We have been facilitating improvements in the short term, while helping stakeholders begin to tackle the difficult long term issues. In the past six months we have worked with business, the insurance industry, lawyers and unions to build a real and constructive partnership.
Already this partnership is having beneficial results for business, particularly smaller businesses, in areas such as renewals and making underwriting more risk-based. Providing better risk information has improved Small and Medium Sized Enterprises' (SMEs') access to the EL insurance market and in some cases delivered lower premiums. Further work is aimed at encouraging better health and safety and occupational health and thus, fewer costs to firms from injury, illness and absence. Action to reduce process costs will also help keep premium increases under control, as could greater use of rehabilitation in some cases.
To deliver significant, sustained improvements we must tackle the underlying problems together.
4 Dec 2003 : Column 68WS
Consequently, we have helped stakeholders identify ways to reduce process costs and are working with them to pilot these measures. We are working on ways to improve companies' management of health and safety and so cut both the incidence and the costs of claims. And, in the light of increasing evidence that effective and timely rehabilitation can reduce overall costs whilst delivering a better outcome for the victim, we are making a significant step-change in our approach to rehabilitation. Our safety performance in the UK is good. That is one reason why the costs of Employers' Liability Compulsory Insurance are still much lower than our international competitors. However, there is more to be done, particularly on occupational health. Absence management, incident management and follow-up can help cut both the incidence and the costs of claims. That is why Government are working with the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and insurers to provide guidance and to help business present hard evidence on their management of health and safety to the market thereby ensuring they get value from their health and safety investment. This should help tackle the problems faced by small firms with good health and safety practices.
As we address the problems in the market and for businesses, particularly smaller businesses, it is important to remind ourselves why employers' liability compulsory insurance is important:
- to provide an incentive to reduce accidents at work and improve health and safety;
to properly compensate employees who are injured through their employers' negligence; and
to protect businesses by spreading the risk of workplace accidents which might otherwise ruin them financially.
An effective response and sustainable improvement, requires a long term partnership. The past six months have seen such a partnership develop and start to deliver. Government are determined to play its part. This may be a final report, but it is not an end to our work.