---

14 Jan 2004 : Column 791W—continued

World Trade Organisation

Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions she has had since 14 September 2003 with the Director General of the World Trade Organisation about the status of papers produced by chairmen and facilitators of working groups, and the role of the World Trade Organisation Secretariat, at World Trade Organisation Ministerials. [146596]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: My right hon. Friend has discussed various issues with Dr. Supachai, since 14 September, including the organisation of WTO Ministerial conferences.

Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what immediate reforms she has proposed to the conduct of World Trade Organisation Ministerials. [146615]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: The Government have discussed a number of proposals for the reform of the WTO with our EU partners and the European Commission. These proposals are reflected in the commission's strategy paper, "Reviving the DDA Negotiations—the EU perspective", which was endorsed by the European Council of Ministers on 8 December last year.

However, it is vital that reform of the WTO should not distract members from pursuing the Doha Development Agenda.

Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what submission her Department has made to the Sutherland Commission on longer-term reforms of World Trade Organisation Ministerials. [146635]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: The Government have discussed a number of proposals for the reform of the WTO with our EU partners and the European Commission. These proposals are reflected in the Commission's strategy paper, "Reviving the DDA Negotiations—the EU perspective", which was endorsed by the European Council of Ministers on 8 December last year.

SOLICITOR-GENERAL

Infant Death

Mr. George Osborne: To ask the Solicitor General (1) if she will make a statement on the implications of the Angela Cannings case for the Crown Prosecution Service; [144510]

14 Jan 2004 : Column 792W

(2) what guidance she has issued to Chief Crown prosecutors about cases involving mothers accused of killing their infant children; and whether she expects to issue new guidance; [144511]

(3) how many mothers were charged with infanticide in each of the last 20 years; and how many mothers were charged with murder of their own children in each of the last 20 years; [144512]

(4) if the Crown Prosecution Service will review family court cases in which evidence was given by Professor Meadow; [144516]

(5) when the inter-departmental group she established to consider the implications of the Sally Clarke case will decide whether to review cases involving Professor Meadow; [144517]

(6) in how many family court cases evidence was given by Professor Meadow; [144518]

(7) when she expects the Crown Prosecution Service to conclude its review of the cases in which Dr. Alan Williams conducted a post mortem; [144519]

(8) what the total cost to public funds of the prosecution of Sally Clarke, Angela Cannings and Trupti Patel has been. [144524]

The Solicitor-General: We are awaiting the full written judgment of the Court of Appeal in the Angela Cannings case and therefore it is not possible to make a detailed statement on the implications at this stage.

At the Court of Appeal hearing, Lord Justice Judge expressed concern about the difficulties for the trial jury in resolving issues regarding complex scientific evidence in relation to infant death when the present state of scientific knowledge is evolving.

He went on to state that the appeal had raised a number of issues of general public interest in relation to infant deaths and the Court of Appeal would therefore need time to reflect on the terms of its judgment.

The Crown Prosecution Service has taken note of these comments and will study the full judgment carefully when it is released.

Since the written reasons of the Court of Appeal in the case of Sally Clark were made available, and following the acquittal of Trupti Patel, the Crown Prosecution Service has undertaken a number of actions. Interim guidance was sent to all Chief Crown Prosecutors on 17 June 2003 requesting that all cases be identified in which either Doctor Williams or Professor Meadow are witnesses and requiring them to serve a copy of the judgement in the Sally Clark case on the defence and to draw attention to sections of the judgement touching on their evidence.

Following the appeal of Sally Clark, the Attorney General established a Group comprising representatives of the police, Crown Prosecution Service, Home Office and other relevant agencies to consider whether any cases in which Doctor Williams has given important evidence require a more in depth review.

On 28 July, the Group held its first meeting. Progress was made in two areas. Firstly, on how previous cases in which Doctor Alan Williams conducted a post mortem

14 Jan 2004 : Column 793W

were to be identified and, secondly, what factors would be used to select the cases on which the Group should concentrate.

Following that meeting, work commenced immediately on the identification of relevant cases. The Group met a deadline of mid-September for the conclusion of that process. By that date, approximately 50 previous cases had been identified, which dated back between five-seven years. These cases all involved charges of murder, manslaughter or infanticide where Doctor Williams had been instructed by the police to conduct the post mortem and which had resulted in a conviction. The cases themselves are now being individually reviewed. An experienced Metropolitan police officer and a Crown Prosecutor are conducting the review. This work is continuing.

When the full written judgement in Angela Cannings is published, the same group will consider whether to extend the review to include cases involving Professor Meadow.

The total cost incurred by the Crown Prosecution Service in the case of Sally Clark will eventually be approximately £320,000. That figure comprises counsels' fees, expert witness costs and approximately £50,000 is estimated as being attributable to Crown Prosecution Service staff costs.

The costs of the Trupti Patel case are approximately £183,716.63. We cannot provide an estimate of CPS costs for this case at this stage, however, I will write to the hon. Member with those details once known.

The costs of the Angela Cannings case have not yet been settled. However, it is estimated that prosecution costs arising from the original trial and the subsequent appeal will be in the region of £220,000.

Owing to the way CPS records arc kept, figures on the number of mothers charged with infanticide and mothers charged with the murder of their own children cannot be produced without incurring disproportionate costs.

The Crown Prosecution Service was set up by the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 to take over the conduct of criminal cases instituted by the police (other than some minor cases). It has no statutory power to initiate a review of family court cases in which evidence was given by Professor Meadow.

Information on the number of cases in the Family Court in which Professor Meadow has given evidence is not held centrally. The Crown is not usually party to Family Court cases.

No guidance to Crown. Prosecutors relating specifically to mothers accused of killing their infant children has been issued.

WORK AND PENSIONS

Benefits

Mr. Willetts: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if the Department will reinstate in its

14 Jan 2004 : Column 794W

website's section on benefit expenditure tables, tables 1 and 2, showing detailed benefit spending from 1993–94 onwards. [147014]

Mr. Pond: The information requested has been posted on the Department's website, updated to include pre-Budget report 2003 expenditure forecasts.

Mr. Jenkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people drew their benefits at (a) Belgrave branch post office, (b) Dosthill branch post office, (c) Kerria road branch post office, (d) Hockley branch post office, (e) Kettlebrook branch post office, (f) Silver Link branch post office, (g) Two Gates branch post office and (h) Wilnecote branch post office in Tamworth in the last (i) week, (ii) month and (iii) year for which figures are available. [147035]

Mr. Pond: The information is not available in the format requested.

Statistics are not held on payment data on an individual Post Office basis.

Mr. Flight: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will make a statement on the reasons for differences between the figures in table 5 of his Department's Benefit Expenditure Tables and the estimates for social security benefit expenditure provided in table B13 of the pre-Budget report. [147415]

Mr. Pond: Table 5 of the DWP Benefit Expenditure Tables and the estimates for social security benefit expenditure provided in table B13 of the pre-Budget report do not have the same coverage of Government Spending. DWP Benefit Expenditure Tables cover those benefits for which DWP has policy responsibility, only covering Great Britain (except for Over 75 TV Licences). The pre-Budget report figures represent a broader measure of social security benefit expenditure, covering all of the United Kingdom.

Further details of the differences can be found in the notes accompanying the expenditure tables on the Department's website.

---