Previous Section Index Home Page

27 Apr 2004 : Column 935W—continued

Drugs Misuse (Manchester)

Mr. Kaufman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what public funds were spent on tackling drugs misuse in Manchester Gorton in (a) 1997–98 and (b) 2003–04. [167470]

Caroline Flint: Figures are not available for 1997–8.

Figures for 2003–04 are available for Manchester as a whole only. In 2003–04 the following amounts were spent on tackling drugs misuse in Manchester City Council area.
£
Adult Pooled Treatment Budget:3,390,000
Young People's Pooled Budget996,485
Building Safer Communities1,082,189
Criminal Justice Interventions Programme (Capacity Building and Throughcare and Aftercare)800,000
Drug Testing (within Greater Manchester Police Force area)1,198,491.65
Total7,467,165.65








 
27 Apr 2004 : Column 936W
 

Gamekeepers

Mr. Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home   Department How many gamekeepers have been convicted in the last 10 years of the illegal killing of hen harriers. [167197]

Caroline Flint [holding answer 22 April 2004]: Information collected centrally by the Home Office on court proceedings in relation to wildlife does not enable the type of bird involved to be identified, nor the status of the person convicted.

Justice and Home Affairs Council

Mr. Connarty: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the outcome was of the Justice and Home Affairs Council held on 30 March; what the Government's stance was on the issues discussed, including its voting record; and if he will make a statement. [165594]

Caroline Flint: I wrote to the European Scrutiny Committee on 5 April reporting the outcome of the Justice and Home Affairs Council.

Parole

Mrs. Gillan: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many life sentence prisoners have been released on parole during each of the last 48 months. [168020]

Paul Goggins: The requested information is shown in the table.
Releases on life licence April 2000-March 2004

MonthYear      Number of releases
April(20)20008
May200013
June200019
July200013
August20004
September20007
October20008
November20006
December20004
January200116
February200114
March200113
April200125
May200112
June200114
July200111
August200117
September20019
October200118
November200115
December200110
January200210
February200213
March200210
April200212
May200217
June200212
July200222
August200226
September200214
October200226
November200214
December200218
January200318
February200328
March200329
April200318
May200330
June200322
July200338
August200332
September200322
October200340
November200315
December200330
January200415
February200431
March200438


(20) Information for April 2000-March 2001 relates to first time release cases only. Subsequent data also include cases where prisoners have been re-released following recall from life licence.



 
27 Apr 2004 : Column 937W
 

Part 1 Warrant

Mrs. Curtis-Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether the information required to be provided on the face of a part 1 warrant, including a European Arrest Warrant, is specified in legislation. [165887]

Caroline Flint: The information required to be provided on the face of a part 1 warrant is specified in section 2 of the Extradition Act 2003.

Prison Drug Treatments

John Mann: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost per offender was of each drug treatment and testing order in 2003 in (a) Nottinghamshire and (b) England. [168209]

Paul Goggins: This information is not held centrally but the recent report by the National Audit Office, "The Drug Treatment and Testing Order (DTTO): early lessons" reported that the unit cost of an order in 2002–03 in the areas they visited varied from £5,258 to £7,592. Nottingham Probation Area has advised us that   the approximate average cost of a DTTO in Nottinghamshire was £5,363.

Prisoners

Mrs. Gillan: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prisoners in 2003 began training, education or offender behaviour programmes but were unable to complete these courses due to (a) transfer to another establishment and (b) release from custody. [168028]

Paul Goggins: In 2003 approximately 8,300 prisoners began accredited offending behaviour programmes. Of   the 6,946 commencements of general offending behaviour programmes—Enhanced Thinking Skills and Reasoning and Rehabilitation—95 prisoners (1.4 per cent.) did not complete because they were transferred and 16 (0.2 per cent.) did not complete because they were released. The percentage of prisoners not completing other accredited programmes for these reasons would have been similar or lower.

Equivalent information on non-completion is not collected centrally for prisoners' training and education.
 
27 Apr 2004 : Column 938W
 

John Mann: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prisoners were assessed as having drug-related problems on (a) entry to and (b) exit from each (i) HM Prison Service establishment and (ii) privately run prison establishment since January 2003. [168206]

Paul Goggins: Figures on the number of prisoners assessed on entry as having a drug-related problem are not recorded centrally, but epidemiological studies show around 54 per cent. of new receptions to be problematic drug misusers and that around 80 per cent. of prisoners had used drugs at some point before coming into custody. All prisoners receive a healthcare assessment on reception. This resulted in detoxification being provided to 50,701 prisoners in 2002–03, 4,085 of whom were in the contracted estate.

All prisons employ drug counselling, assessment, referral and throughcare (CARATs) teams, who, among other tasks, are responsible for putting problematic drug using prisoners in touch with community support on leaving prison. CARATs teams dealt with 52,000 prisoners in 2002–03 at all stages in their sentence.

No separate assessment of drug-related problems is made at the point offenders leave prisons. There will always be a heightened risk of relapse on return to the community and a key aim of the Criminal Justice Interventions Programme is to strengthen continuity of treatment and reduce that risk.

Prisons

Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, under future market tests of publicly run prisons, staff transferred to a private sector operator will be protected by the two tier workforce provisions applicable to local government employees in a similar position. [161960]

Paul Goggins: The Home Office complies with policy for Central Government Departments and Agencies on the handling of staff transfers. The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 ("TUPE") govern the majority of such staff transfers and contractors are normally also required to apply the principles set out in the Cabinet Office Statement of Practice "Staff Transfers in the Public Sector" and its annex "A Fair Deal for Staff Pensions". The Home Office does not propose to extend this further to mirror the two-tier workforce provisions contained in the Local Government Code of Practice on Workforce Matters.

Young Offenders

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many young offenders were held in secure accommodation by each local authority social services department on the latest date for which figures are available. [164203]

Paul Goggins: The number of young offenders held under sentence in local authority secure children's homes on 29 March 2004, by Youth Offending Team, is given in the table.
 
27 Apr 2004 : Column 939W
 

Young offenders held in LASCHs under sentence, by Youth 29 March 2004

Number
Barking and Dagenham1
Barnsley2
Basingstoke2
Bath and North East Somerset1
Bexley1
Birmingham (Central)1
Birmingham (East)3
Birmingham (North)1
Birmingham (South)4
Blackburn with Darwen2
Bolton5
Bournemouth and Poole1
Bracknell Forest1
Bradford3
Brent1
Bristol1
Bury MBC1
Caerphilly and Blaunau Gwent1
Calderdale3
Cambridgeshire1
Camden2
Canterbury and Swale1
Cardiff5
Cheshire (Central)1
Chesterfield1
Coventry1
Croydon1
Cumbria2
Darlington borough council1
Derby city council3
Derbyshire county council1
Dudley4
Durham (South)2
Enfield2
Flintshireand Wrexham5
Gloucestershire1
Gwynedd and Ynys Mon1
Hackney4
Halton and Warrington1
Hammersmith and Fulham2
Haringey1
Hertfordshire East1
Hertfordshire North2
Kent county council3
Kingston Upon Hull city council5
Kirklees2
Lancashire8
Leeds10
Leicester1
Lewisham2
Liverpool8
Manchester Central7
Merthyr Tydfil2
Milton Keynes1
Monmouthshire and Torfaen1
Neath Port Talbot1
Newark and Bassetlaw1
Newcastle upon Tyne2
Newham4
Newport3
Norfolk1
North East Lincolnshire2
North Lincolnshire2
North Tyneside4
North Yorkshire1
Nottingham City7
Oxfordshire2
Peterborough3
Richmond-upon-Thames1
Rochdale3
Rotherham2
Salford City3
Sandwell3
Sheffield2
Somerset1
South Durham1
South Tyneside1
Southwark3
St. Helens1
Staffordshire1
Stockport2
Stoke on Trent2
Sunderland4
Surrey1
Sutton1
Swansea1
Tameside1
Trafford4
Wakefield1
Waltham Forest3
Wandsworth3
Wessex8
West Sussex3
Wigan1
Wiltshire3
Windsor and Maidenhead1
Wirral2
Wolverhampton1
Worcestershire and Herefordshire2
York1

 
27 Apr 2004 : Column 940W
 


Next Section Index Home Page