10 Jun 2004 : Column 574Wcontinued
WORK AND PENSIONS
Attendance Allowance
John Thurso:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people in Scotland have applied for attendance allowance since February 2002, broken down by (a) disability benefit centre and (b) quarter. [176761]
10 Jun 2004 : Column 575W
Maria Eagle:
The information requested is in the table.
| All | Edinburgh | Glasgow
|
May 2002(31) | 7,250 | 3,675 | 3,575
|
August 2002 | 9,665 | 4,905 | 4,760
|
November 2002 | 9,540 | 5,070 | 4,470
|
February 2003 | 8,785 | 4,625 | 4,160
|
May 2003 | 10,550 | 5,475 | 5,075
|
August 2003 | 10,465 | 5,275 | 5,190
|
November 2003 | 10,430 | 5,330 | 5,100
|
February 2004 | 8,905 | 4,570 | 4,335
|
(31) March data are unavailable for this quarter
Notes:
Figures taken from a 100 per cent. sample at the end of each quarter.
Figures are rounded to the nearest 5.
Source:
IAD Information Centre
Child Support Agency
Mr. Frank Field:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions when those Child Support Agency cases enrolled under the old rules will be converted to the new rules system. [177974]
Mr. Pond:
I refer my right hon. Friend to the Written Answer I gave the hon. Member for Castle Point (Bob Spink) on 18 December 2003, Official Report, column 1092W.
Council Tax Benefit
John Barrett:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people are in receipt of council tax benefit in the City of Edinburgh local authority area. [176735]
10 Jun 2004 : Column 576W
Mr. Pond:
The number of council tax benefit recipients in the City of Edinburgh at August 2003 is 38,100.
1. The data refer to benefit units, which may be a single person or a couple.
Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System, Quarterly 100 per cent. caseload stock-count taken in August 2003.
John Barrett:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will estimate the cost to local authorities of administering council tax benefit; and if he will make a statement. [176739]
Mr. Pond:
The information is in the table.
Cost of administering council tax benefit
| £ million
|
England | 229
|
Wales | 12
|
Scotland | 19
|
Great Britain | 259
|
Notes:
1. Figures are for reported net current expenditure in 200203.
Amounts are rounded to the nearest £ million. The sum of the individual countries does not equal the Great Britain total due to rounding.
2. Figures for England are provided by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
3. Figures for Wales are provided by the Welsh Assembly.
4. Figures for Scotland are provided by the Scottish Executive.
Simon Hughes:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the cost was of administering council tax benefit payments in (a) Greater London and (b) each London borough in each of the last five years. [177186]
Mr. Pond:
The information is in the table.
Net cost of administering Council Tax benefit in nominal terms
£ million
| 199899 | 199900 | 200001 | 200102 | 200203
|
Total Greater London | 38.4 | 39.3 | 45.0 | 52.4 | 47.7
|
| | | | |
|
Of which: | | | | |
|
Inner London | | | | |
|
City of London | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0
|
Camden | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5
|
Greenwich | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 2.5
|
Hackney | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 3.2
|
Hammersmith and Fulham | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6
|
Islington | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 3.3
|
Kensington and Chelsea | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5
|
Lambeth | 3.1 | 3.4 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 2.2
|
Lewisham | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0
|
Southwark | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2
|
Tower Hamlets | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 3.0
|
Wandsworth | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2.0
|
Westminster | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.3
|
| | | | |
|
Outer London | | | | |
|
Barking and Dagenham | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.8
|
Barnet | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.8
|
Bexley | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6
|
Brent | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.2
|
Bromley | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6
|
Croydon | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3
|
Ealing | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.9
|
Enfield | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.9
|
Haringey | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.5
|
Harrow | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9
|
Havering | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.9
|
Hillingdon | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5
|
Hounslow | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3
|
Kingston | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.7
|
Merton | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1
|
Newham | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 3.2
|
Redbridge | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6
|
Richmond | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4
|
Sutton | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5
|
Waltham Forest | 3.3 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9
|
Notes:
1. The figures shown are reported net current expenditure, in nominal terms.
2. All figures are provided to the nearest £0.1 million. The total greater London figure shown may not be the sum of the individual authorities due to rounding.
Source:
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
10 Jun 2004 : Column 577W
Simon Hughes:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what the value was of council tax benefit payments made in (a) Greater London and (b) each London borough in each of the last five years; [177187]
(2) what the value was of council tax benefit payments made in (a) Greater London and (b) each London borough in each of the last five years; and what estimate he has made of the total amount of council tax benefit unclaimed in each of those years. [177188]
10 Jun 2004 : Column 578W
Mr. Pond:
The information requested about the total amount of unclaimed council tax benefit is not available below national level. Estimates of the total amount of council tax benefit unclaimed at a national level can be found in a series of DWP reports entitled: "Income Related Benefits Estimates of Take-Up". The latest publication relates to financial year 200102; copies of this and previous reports are available from the Library.
The value of council tax benefit payments made in each London borough and greater London as a whole, from 199899 to 200203 is in the table.
Council tax benefit expenditure in nominal terms
£million
| Outturn
|
Greater London | 199899 | 19992000 | 200001 | 200102 | 200203(32)
|
City of London | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2
|
Camden | 18.3 | 18.0 | 17.4 | 18.0 | 18.9
|
Greenwich | 18.0 | 16.6 | 15.9 | 16.2 | 16.9
|
Hackney | 20.2 | 17.2 | 19.3 | 24.2 | 26.1
|
Hammersmith | 12.0 | 11.9 | 12.1 | 12.5 | 12.7
|
Islington | 22.4 | 20.5 | 19.7 | 19.0 | 18.6
|
Kensington and Chelsea | 5.8 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 7.6
|
Lambeth | 18.2 | 16.8 | 17.3 | 19.1 | 20.1
|
Lewisham | 14.8 | 14.5 | 14.8 | 15.7 | 16.9
|
Southwark | 18.5 | 18.0 | 18.8 | 19.6 | 20.5
|
Tower Hamlets | 14.6 | 14.7 | 15.4 | 16.4 | 17.4
|
Wandsworth | 5.3 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 6.4 | 5.6
|
Westminster | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 6.5
|
Total Inner London | 172.9 | 164.8 | 167.6 | 180.1 | 187.9
|
| | | | |
|
Barking | 9.9 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 11.3 | 12.1
|
Barnet | 12.1 | 12.1 | 12.5 | 13.3 | 14.0
|
Bexley | 7.1 | 7.6 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 8.3
|
Brent | 12.4 | 13.2 | 14.5 | 15.0 | 16.7
|
Bromley | 7.7 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 9.7 | 10.2
|
Croydon | 13.2 | 13.5 | 13.7 | 13.6 | 13.9
|
Baling | 12.2 | 13.0 | 12.1 | 14.5 | 14.6
|
Enfield | 13.3 | 13.5 | 14.6 | 16.0 | 17.0
|
Haringey | 22.6 | 22.5 | 22.3 | 21.6 | 21.9
|
Harrow | 7.3 | 7.5 | 8.1 | 9.0 | 9.6
|
Havering | 8.1 | 8.6 | 9.3 | 9.9 | 10.7
|
Hillingdon | 9.6 | 10.2 | 10.7 | 11.7 | 12.6
|
Hounslow | 10.7 | 10.8 | 11.0 | 11.7 | 12.6
|
Kingston | 3.7 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 5.5
|
Merton | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 8.3 | 8.6
|
Newham | 17.7 | 16.8 | 17.6 | 18.2 | 19.1
|
Redbridge | 9.1 | 9.4 | 9.9 | 10.3 | 10.9
|
Richmond | 5.6 | 6.0 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 7.5
|
Sutton | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 6.3 | 6.9
|
Waltham Forest | 14.9 | 14.4 | 14.2 | 14.8 | 15.4
|
Total Outer London | 210.7 | 215.3 | 221.7 | 234.8 | 248.2
|
Total Greater London | 383.6 | 380.1 | 389.3 | 414.9 | 436.1
|
(32) Estimated
Notes.
1. All expenditure figures are rounded to the nearest £0.1 million and therefore may not add up to the total greater London expenditure.
2. Expenditure figures for 199899 to 200102 are final outturn figures supplied by local authorities in 'final audited' subsidy claims. The figures for 200203 are the latest available estimated outturn figures, provided by local authorities in their 'initial final' subsidy claims, and are subject to revision in the final audited' claims.
3. Figures are total yearly amounts paid to beneficiaries, regardless of the source of funding, and includes payments subsidised by DWP, those funded through local authorities housing revenue accounts, spending financed by the National Asylum Support Service, and benefit spending financed from local authorities' general funds.
Source:
1. 199899Final Audited Subsidy claim forms submitted by local authorities.
2. 200203Initial Final Claim forms submitted by local authorities.
10 Jun 2004 : Column 579W