Previous Section Index Home Page

28 Jun 2004 : Column 98W—continued

London Housing Board

Jeremy Corbyn: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the expenditure of the London Housing Board has been since its foundation; and if he will list the projects which it has funded. [180330]

Keith Hill: The role of the London Housing Board is to prepare a Regional Housing Strategy and advise Ministers on strategic housing investment priorities in London. Following recommendations from the London Housing Board, London will receive £2.1 billion for housing in the region over the two years 2004–05 and 2005–06.
Table 1: London Regional Housing Pot
£ million

2004–052005–06
Housing Corporation Approved Development Programme(49) (including for key workers)736.6
(177)
757.6
(194)
Local Authorities Allocation(50)209.1215.2
Discretionary Pot for Innovative Local Schemes Delivering New Supply (See Table 2)39.828.6
Discretionary Pot for Private Sector Renewal (See Table 3)10.911.1
Discretionary Pot for Local Authority Regeneration Schemes (See Table 4)42.658.5


(49) Funding allocated, via the Housing Corporation, to housing associations to provide homes for rent or low cost home ownership through both new build and acquisition and refurbishment.
(50) Capital allocation to local authorities to support housing capital investment and which is not project specific.



Table 2: Innovative Local Schemes
£000

Local Authority
Housing Association

Scheme
2004–05 and 2005–06
Barking and DagenhamEast Thames Housing GroupAxe Street1,250
BrentPaddington Churches HADonnington Court2,149
CroydonMetropolitan HTCroydon Garages group A606
EnfieldChristian A EnfieldSalisbury School Keyworker515
HackneySouthern Housing GroupMillennium Plus at the Nightingale4,456
Hammersmith and FulhamThreshold Housing and SupportWestway Beacons15,430
HaringeySolon CHSIvatts Way1,175
IslingtonThe Guinness TrustHornsey Road Baths6,770
Kingston upon ThamesTown and Country GroupCocks Crescent New Maiden6,000
LambethLondon & Quadrant HTPenzance House1,600
MertonPresentation HABirnam House, 9 Langley Road525
MertonWandle HAMerton HRA Sites Phase 13,975
NewhamTower Homes LimitedGreengate House6,160
NewhamToynbee HANewham CPO1,860
SouthwarkPresentation HA41–75 Consort Road5,781
SouthwarkHexagonDog Kennel Hill School1,376
Tower HamletsSwan Housing AssociationCrossways Phase 18,490
WestminsterTower Homes LimitedFrampton Street251

Table 3: Private sector renewal
£000



Sub Region


Scheme
Allocation 2004–05 and 2005–06
EastDecent Homes for Vulnerable People2,000
EastHomes from Redundant Shops2,500
NorthSupply Scheme3,500
South EastHealthy Homes1,000
South EastRenewal Loan fund2,000
South EastColdblasters1,000
South WestUniversal Coldblasters2,000
South WestEmpty Homes2,000
WestEmpty Property Website345
WestHeatstreets3,655
Pan-LondonHouseproud830
Pan-LondonLandlord Accreditation1,170









 
28 Jun 2004 : Column 99W
 

Table 4: Local Authority Regeneration
£000



Local Authority


Scheme
Allocation 2004–05 and 2005–06
BarnetStonegrove and Spur Road2,981
BrentSouth Kilburn Regeneration9,850
BromleyRamsden Regeneration2,679
CamdenGospel Oak2,926
CamdenAmpthill Square Estate5,876
EalingSouth Acton Estate7,745
GreenwichSolar Powered Hot Water495
GreenwichRavens Way, Kidbrooke1,979
HillingdonRomney Parade183
HounslowIvybridge Estate5,914
HounslowConvent Way2,483
IslingtonTollington Estate7,911
Kensington and
Chelsea
Redcliffe Square495
Kensington and
Chelsea
Finborough Road and Edith Grove445
LambethEthelred Estate (low rise)5,373
LewishamHonor Oak Estate8,328
MertonSafer Homes81
MertonHome Energy for life178
NewhamBrooks Road and Plaistow Borth Estate1,978
SouthwarkAylesbury Estate11,398
SouthwarkFour Squares Estate2,318
SuttonDurand Estate2,473
Tower HamletsTarling East Estate1,029
Tower HamletsCrossways Estate5,345
Waltham ForestBisterne Avenue and St. Andrews Court1,933
WestminsterWarwick Towers8,764

Ordnance Survey

Mr. Sayeed: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much money Ordnance Survey has received in the last four financial years in Government (a) grants and (b) mapping contracts; and whether Ordnance Survey had to compete for the contracts. [153756]

Yvette Cooper: Ordnance Survey does not receive any Government grants. As a Government Department and Trading Fund, Ordnance Survey earns its revenues from commercial licences, commercial services and product sales. This revenue includes transactions with Government through inter Crown agreements including services delivered through the National Interest Mapping Service Agreement and the Pan Government Agreement. Ordnance Survey income is reported in its Annual Reports.

Land Prices (Essex)

Mr. Hurst: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the average price was of land per hectare with planning permission to build housing in each district council area in Essex in 2003. [180962]

Keith Hill: The information requested is not held centrally, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Planning Appeals

Mrs. Gillan: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what account is taken of the financial viability of the applicant in planning appeals considered by his Department. [180969]


 
28 Jun 2004 : Column 100W
 

Keith Hill: All planning appeals are determined on their planning merits, and an applicant's financial viability is not normally a material planning consideration. However, the viability of an existing or proposed enterprise may be a relevant consideration in some cases.

Postal Ballots

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister who will meet the costs of reprinting postal ballot papers for the elections on 10 June. [178663]

Mr. Raynsford: Returning officers have the contractual relationships with suppliers of ballot packs. To the extent that their suppliers are not liable for reprinting costs, regional and local returning officers will be able to claim re-imbursement from Government for services properly rendered, or expenses properly incurred, for or in connection with the European election. Insofar as the local elections in principal areas or parishes within the pilot regions are concerned, returning officers will be able to claim "local election pilot expenditure" from Government. That will include any expenditure which is apportioned to the local election, which exceeds the expenditure which would have been incurred if the region had not been one of the pilot regions.

Mr. Evans: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will estimate the total cost of the all-postal ballots for the elections to be held on 10 June. [178279]

Mr. Raynsford: The Government's current estimate of the total cost of the ballots in the four all-postal pilot regions is £23.8 million.

Rural Exceptions Sites

Mr. Drew: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister (1) when he expects to make an announcement on new PPG3, with particular reference to rural exceptions sites; [180393]

(2) what discussions he has had with the (a) National Association of Local Councils, (b) rural community councils and (c) individual parish and town councils on the impact of building on rural exceptions sites. [180394]

Keith Hill: The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is finalising the proposed updates to PPG3 (Housing) titled 'Influencing the size, type and affordability of housing' and 'Supporting the delivery of new housing' in the light of the responses to the consultation exercise undertaken last year. Our aim is to publish the updates to PPG3 in the autumn, including the approach to planning for mixed communities in rural areas. Any further revisions to PPG3 to take account of the recommendations of the Barker review of housing supply will be completed in 2005.

Eight responses were received from rural community councils and parish councils to 'Influencing the size, type and affordability of housing'. Of the five responses received from rural community councils, four were
 
28 Jun 2004 : Column 101W
 
supportive of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's proposals in the update for a 100 per cent. affordable housing allocation policy, but also asked that the existing rural exceptions policy should be retained. The other was opposed to the proposed allocation policy, preferring a retention of the existing policy.

Three responses were received from parish councils. One was supportive of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's proposals, while another was opposed to it, preferring a retention of the existing policy. The third parish council did not register any comments on that particular aspect of the proposals. Formal representations were not received from the National Association of Local Council or any town councils. We will take into account all of the responses it received to the consultation exercise, including those from the rural community and parish councils, in finalising the PPG3 update.


Next Section Index Home Page