Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Chris Smith:
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what funding he has made available
20 Jul 2004 : Column 217W
in each year since 1997 for anti-crime and community safety initiatives in the London borough of Islington; and what funding is projected for future years. [184721]
Ms Blears:
The Home Office has to date provided a total of £2,948,779 to the London borough of Islington for anti-crime and community safety initiatives.
20 Jul 2004 : Column 218W
Funding commenced in 200001. In addition, a total of £732,872 has been provided to Islington police under the Basic Command Unit (BCU) Fund in 200304 and 200405. The table shows the annual breakdown for each funding stream, giving a total figure of £3,681,651. Future crime reduction funding for individual authorities will be announced in due course.
Financial year | 200001 | 200102 | 200203 | 200304 | 200405 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crime Reduction Programme (CRP) | 222,227 | 371,809 | 125,500 | | | 719,536 |
Partnership Development Fund (PDF) | 59,570 | 50,000 | 50,000 | | | 159,570 |
Communities Against Drugs (CAD) | | 262,200 | 594,218 | | | 856,418 |
Safer Communities Initiative (SCI) | | | 137,255 | | | 137,255 |
Small Retailers in Deprived Areas (SRDA) | | 26,419 | 66,236 | 66,236 | | 158,891 |
Building Safer Communities Fund | | | | 412,195 | 422,500 | 834,695 |
Basic Command Unit (BCU) Fund | | | | 366,436 | 366,436 | 732,872 |
Home Office Directors Allocation | | | | 20,000 | | 20,000 |
Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB) Fund | | | | 22,414 | 25,000 | 47,414 |
Vehicle Crime | | | | 15,000 | | 15,000 |
Total | 281,797 | 710,428 | 973,209 | 902,281 | 813,936 | 3,681,651 |
Mrs. Curtis-Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment has been made of the general population's attitude towards (a) prisons and (b) alternatives to prison as a means of punishment and rehabilitation. [182283]
Paul Goggins: The most recent assessment was made as part of the Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales "Making Punishments Work", released in July 2001. This assessment is based on a review of the literature on attitudes to sentencing as well as a survey of public attitudes (conducted in October 2000). Full details can be found in Appendix 5 to the report.
Further information on public attitudes is also available in Home Office Research Study 245 (Improving public attitudes to the Criminal Justice System: The impact of information, Chapman et al, 2002). This includes details from a nationally representative sample on knowledge and attitudes to crime and sentencing.
In addition, information will be available in future as a result the Crime and Justice Survey. Results from this are currently being analysed and will provide information on offending, and people's attitudes towards the Criminal Justice System and sentences.
Annabelle Ewing: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether the forthcoming draft Bill on Corporate Manslaughter is to extend to Scotland. [185162]
Paul Goggins [holding answer 19 July 2004]: The Government are currently developing their proposals for reforming the law on corporate manslaughter.
We plan to issue a draft Bill before the end of the current session.
Sir Gerald Kaufman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) when he will reply to the letter to him dated 24 May 2004 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Manchester council for Community Relations; [182490]
(2) when he intends to reply to the letter to him dated 24 May 2004 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr. N Khan Moghal. [183686]
Fiona Mactaggart: I replied to my right hon. Friend's letter on 9 July 2004 on behalf of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department.
Mr. Goodman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what changes there have been to the name of the Prison Service's Diversity and Equality Group within the last two months; and if he will make a statement. [184608]
Paul Goggins [holding answer 16 July 2004]: The Prison Service has reviewed the role of the Diversity and Equality Group, which has led to the formation of a new Race and Equalities Action Group. The new group will have three key teams:
Delivery Team;
Community Links Team; and
Policy and Programme Team.
The change reflects the Prison Service's commitment to ensuring that significant improvements continue to be made to race and diversity issues, and that responsibilities and obligations under the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, are implemented fully in every prison. The new group will take effect from 19 July 2004.
Mrs. Curtis-Thomas:
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people have received
20 Jul 2004 : Column 219W
drug treatment in prison in each year since 1997 as a percentage of (a) the prison population and (b) the total demand. [182303]
Paul Goggins: The information requested is as follows:
(a) People in prison receiving drug treatment as a percentage of those received into prison annually since 2001 (the first year in which drug treatment figures were collected) is given in the following table.
2001 1 | 2002 | 2003 | |
---|---|---|---|
Clinical Services (Detoxification) | 21 | 36 | 42 |
CARATs | 21 | 35 | 40 |
Treatment programmes | 2 | 3 | 3 |
(b) The Prison Service does not collate figures centrally on the demand for drug treatment.
Mr. Clifton-Brown: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many drug treatment and testing orders were made in Gloucestershire in the last year for which figures are available; and what the re-offending rate was for those subject to such orders (a) in Gloucestershire and (b) in England and Wales in that year. [182953]
Paul Goggins: 58 drug treatment and testing orders (DTTOs) were made in Gloucestershire in 200304.
No offenders subject to DTTOs in Gloucestershire in 200304 had their orders revoked because of a conviction for another offence.
Validated information about re-offending for those subject to DTTOs in England and Wales in 200304 is not centrally available.
Mr. Alan Duncan: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many people were prosecuted for buying drink for people who were incapable as a result of alcohol in 2003; [185077]
(2) how many people were prosecuted for allowing drunken or riotous conduct on their premises in 2003. [185078]
Ms Blears: Statistics on court proceedings for 2003 will be published in the autumn.
Mr. Oaten: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what have been identified as the most significant sustainable development impacts in relation to the operation of his Department's estate. [182221]
Fiona Mactaggart:
The sustainable development impacts of the Department's estate varies according to the nature of the business carried out by its constituent
20 Jul 2004 : Column 220W
parts. For the purposes of the Framework for Sustainable Development on the Government Estate, we have divided the Home Office estate into seven areas. These are listed as follows with the key sustainable development impacts for each area
(i) Non Agency Home OfficeOffice Estate
Key impacts: Energy consumption, waste generation, procurement of goods and services, water consumption and vehicle emissions as a result of commuting (sites outside London only).
(ii) Immigration Removals Estate
Key impacts: Energy consumption, waste generation, procurement of goods and services, water consumption, vehicle emissions as a result of business travel and potential to affect biodiversity.
(iii) National Probation Service
Key impacts: Energy consumption, waste generation, water consumption and procurement of goods and services.
(iv) Her Majesty's Prison Service
Key impacts: Energy consumption, waste generation (including hazardous waste), procurement of goods and services, water consumption, vehicle emissions as a result of commuting and business travel and conservation of biodiversity.
Key impacts: Energy consumption, waste generation, water consumption and procurement of good and services.
Key impacts: Energy consumption, waste generation (including hazardous waste), procurement of goods and services, water consumption, vehicle emissions as a result of commuting.
Key impacts: Energy consumption, waste generation, procurement of goods and services, water consumption, vehicle emissions as a result of business travel and potential to affect biodiversity.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |