Previous Section Index Home Page

21 Jul 2004 : Column 312W—continued

Office for National Statistics

Mrs. Spelman: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the estimated expenditure by the Office for National Statistics in compiling regional-level statistics and indicators was in the most recent year for which figures are available. [184977]

Ruth Kelly: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.
 
21 Jul 2004 : Column 313W
 

Letter from Colin Mowl to Mrs. Caroline Spelman, dated 21 July 2004:

Oil Price

Mr. Chaytor: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made in recent economic forecasts of the price per barrel of oil in each of the next five years; and if he will make a statement. [184744]

Ruth Kelly: The assumption underlying the public finance projections, audited by the NAO is stated in Box C1, page 251 of the 2004 FSBR.

Pension Schemes (Public Sector)

Mr. Willetts: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many workers have joined each public sector pension scheme in each year since 1997–98. [185710]

Ruth Kelly: This information is not held centrally and could be collected only at disproportionate cost.

Policy (Environmental Impact)

Mr. Horam: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many new policy proposals or significant changes in policy were produced in (a) 2002–03 and (b) 2003–04; how many of these were screened for their environmental impacts; and how many were the subject of separate environmental appraisals. [185100]

John Healey: Chapter 7 of the 2003 and 2004 Budget books (HC 500 and HC 301) shows how budget measures sit alongside other policies as part of the Government's approach to the environmental elements of sustainable development and sets out the environmental impacts of measures introduced in recent
 
21 Jul 2004 : Column 314W
 
Budgets that have a significant effect on the environment or which serve an environmental purpose (Tables 7.1 and 7.2).

A Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) is produced for all major Budget measures. From spring this year the RIA includes a requirement to consider environmental impacts.

Regional Productivity Growth

Mr. Stephen O'Brien: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what plans he has to measure productivity growth by region following the 2004 Spending Review Key Performance Agreement with the Department of Trade and Industry to make sustainable improvements in the economic performance of all English regions. [185509]

Ruth Kelly: The 2002 Spending Review introduced a joint target for the Treasury, Department of Trade and Industry and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister to improve the growth rate in every English region and over the long term reduce the persistent disparities in growth rates between the regions. In Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland regional development is substantially devolved.

The Technical Note published after the 2002 Spending Review, available on the Departmental websites, sets out how this target will be measured, looking at regional Gross Value Added per head figures produced by the Office for National Statistics. The 2004 Spending Review has reaffirmed this target, and an updated Technical Note will be published on 31 July.

It was also announced that the Office for National Statistics will implement the recommendations of the Allsopp Review in full, which in its final report in March, set out the implications of the regional agenda for economic statistics.

In addition, the Treasury and DTI published a consultation document, Productivity in the UK 5, in March on how progress against productivity, and the drivers of productivity, could best be monitored. A full response to Productivity 5 will be made available soon.

Stamp Duty (Residential Property)

Mr. Prisk: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the revenue implication of restructuring stamp duty on residential property sales to charge marginal rates of (a) 0 per cent. on property sales of £120,000 or less, 2 per cent. on sales revenue between £120,000 and £249,999, 5 per cent. on sales revenue between £250,000 and £499,999, 8 per cent. on sales revenue of £500,000 and above, (b) 0 per cent. on property sales of £120,000 or less, 3 per cent. on sales revenue between £120,000 and £249,999, 5 per cent. on sales revenue equal to £250,000, 8 per cent. on sales revenue of £500,000 and above and (c) 0 per cent. on property sales of £120,000 or less, 3 per cent. on property sales between £120,000 and £249,999, 5 per cent. on sales revenue of £250,000 and 7 per cent. on sales revenue of £500,000 and above. [185385]

Ruth Kelly: The estimated revenue cost, in 2005–06, of restructuring stamp duty on residential property sales
 
21 Jul 2004 : Column 315W
 
according to the three schemes described in the question is given in the following table:
Price of residential propertyTax regime 1
Marginal rates
Tax regime 2
Marginal rates
Tax regime 3
Marginal rates
£0 to £119,999 (percentage)000
£120,000 to £249,999 (percentage)233
£250,000 to £499,999 (percentage)555
£500,000 and above (percentage)887
Revenue Cost (£ million)1,020430570

This does not include any allowance for behavioural changes.

Tax Credits

Lynne Jones: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer under what circumstances backpayments of (a) working tax credit and (b) child tax credit are paid as a series of regular payments rather than as a lump sum. [185683]

Dawn Primarolo: I refer my hon. Friend to the answer given to the hon. Members for Vale of York (Miss McIntosh) and Northavon (Mr. Webb) on 17 July 2003, Official Report, columns 465–66W.

Alan Simpson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the Answer of 13 July, Official Report, columns 1014–15W, on tax credits, when figures for 2003–04 will be available. [185389]

Dawn Primarolo: The timing of complete figures on overpayments in 2003–04 will depend on the timing of the replies to the Annual Review, the time taken to obtain any extra information needed to process them, and the proportion of replies containing provisional income data.

West Sussex (Demographic Population)

Tim Loughton: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what is the demographic population breakdown of West Sussex; [185514]

(2) how many people moved into the Adur, Arun and Worthing Primary Care Trust area in (a) 2002–03 and (b) 2003–04; [185515]

(3) what the population of the south-east region is, broken down into those (a) under the age of 20 years, (b) between 20 and 60 years and (c) over the age of 60 years. [185521]

Ruth Kelly: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from John Pullinger to Mr. Tim Loughton dated 21 July 2004:


 
21 Jul 2004 : Column 316W
 


Mid-year 2002 population estimates for West Sussex
Thousand

Age bandsMaleFemaleTotal
0–1991.485.9177.3
20–59189.1197.1386.2
60+81.7110.6192.4
0–421.120.341.4
5–923.422.045.4
10–1424.723.448.2
15–1922.220.142.3
20–2417.718.135.8
25–2918.219.437.6
30–3423.625.749.4.
35–3928.829.257.9
40–4426.727.354.0
45–4924.625.249.9
50–5424.926.151.1
55–5924.526.150.6
60–6418.720.339.0
65–6917.620.037.6
70–7416.420.136.5
75–7913.218.531.7
80–849.215.524.7
85–894.69.914.5
90+2.06.48.4




Note: Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
Source:
Office for National Statistics.




Population for the South East, Mid-year2002
Thousand

Age bandsMaleFemaleTotal
(a) 0–191,017.7959.51,977.3
(b) 20–592,167.12,184.84,351.9
(c) 60+747.5961.71,709.2




Source:
Office for National Statistics.




Next Section Index Home Page