Previous Section Index Home Page

1 Sept 2004 : Column 847W—continued

Departmental Staff

Mr. Goodman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people have left employment in his Department because of (a) anxiety, (b) stress, (c) depression and (d) other mental health reasons in each year since 1997. [175677]

Fiona Mactaggart: The Home Office does not record the reasons for employees leaving employment in the level of detail requested.

However, since 2003 the Home Office has operated a voluntary exit survey which indicates that seven staff have stated stress as their reason for leaving the Department in 2003 and (to date) four staff in 2004.

The Department is legally obliged to providing a safe working environment for employees and has a number of initiatives in place to reduce work related stress, including return to work interviews and managing sick absence by line managers and stress seminar and workshops run by the Home Office Health and Welfare Service.

Domestic Violence

Mr. Djanogly: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what policies are in place to tackle female-on-male domestic violence. [185075]

Mr. Browne: The 2001 British Crime Survey's Inter-Personal Violence Module shows that one in four women and one in six men have suffered domestic violence at some point in their lives, though women form the overwhelming majority of those subject to the heaviest abuse in terms of frequency, range of violence and severity of injury. The Government's definition of domestic violence is clear that domestic violence can occur regardless of gender or sexuality and the important measures in the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Bill will protect both male and female victims.

Mr. Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the procedure is for women to press charges against their male partners in cases of domestic violence. [185813]

Mr. Browne [holding answer 22 July 2004]: A decision on whether or not to proceed with a case and press charges is a matter for the CPS, having received a file of evidence from the police. Decisions will be made on the appropriate level of charge once the two tests in the code for Crown Prosecutors have been passed. These are firstly whether there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction, and secondly that of the public interest. Victims' views are taken into consideration as part of the public interest test. The two tests must be passed before any criminal case can proceed. The procedure is the same regardless of gender or sexuality.

Drug Rape

Sandra Gidley: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the recommendations of the Sturman Report on drug rape published in June 2000; and if he will make a statement. [177572]


 
1 Sept 2004 : Column 848W
 

Caroline Flint: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 6 July 2004, Official Report, column 202W.

Drug Testing and Treatment

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many drug testing and treatment orders were issued in Gloucestershire in each month since the scheme's inception. [184204]

Caroline Flint: The drug treatment and testing order (DTTO) was piloted in Gloucestershire, Liverpool and Croydon between October 1998 and March 2000. The number of DTTOs made in Gloucestershire in each month during the pilot phase, including April to September 2000 during which the pilots were allowed to continue post-evaluation until the order was rolled-out, was:
Month/yearDTTO commencements
1998
October0
November0
December0
1999
January4
February7
March9
April8
May6
June6
July10
August17
September4
October3
November6
December5
2000
January6
February5
March4
Post evaluation
April3
May4
June7
July5
August6
September3

The number of DTTOs made in Gloucestershire in each month following roll-out of the order across England and Wales on 1 October 2000 is:
Month/yearDTTO commencements
2000
October7
November6
December1
2001
January5
February1
March4
April3
May4
June5
July2
August3
September1
October6
November6
December7
2002
January3
February8
March4
April5
May5
June5
July3
August3
September4
October5
November3
December7
2003
January4
February3
March2
April4
May1
June3
July2
August6
September3
October9
November3
December4
2004
January6
February9
March8
April4
May7

 
1 Sept 2004 : Column 849W
 

Drugs (Prisons and Probation Service)

Mrs. Helen Clark: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will define best value in respect of the provision of drug services for prisons and probation services in England and Wales. [184894]

Paul Goggins: The Prison Service assesses the delivery of service against the specifications for each type of intervention. There are a number of ways "best value" can be judged, which include the effectiveness, accessibility, impact on reoffending and cost efficiency of drug services.

In England, the Probation Service does not directly commission drug services in relation to community Drug Treatment and Testing Orders (DTTOs). Drug Action Teams (DATs) in the community contract local treatment providers to deliver the required treatment.

Mrs. Helen Clark: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many offenders in (a) jail and (b) the community have been dealt with by the major drug agencies which have contracts with the prisons and probation services in the latest year for which figures are available. [184895]

Paul Goggins: The total number of prisoners for 2003–04 entering each type of drug treatment service where the service was delivered partly or solely by an external drug agency is given in the table.
 
1 Sept 2004 : Column 850W
 

Prison entrants into drug treatment services provided, at least in part, by external agencies 2003–04

Entrants onto
clinical services(58)
CARATs(59)
initial assessments
Drug treatment programmes entrants
4,38651,0803,076


(58) This does not include clinical services provided through Primary Care Trusts
(59) Counselling, Assessment, Referral, Advice and Throughcare Service


In England, the Probation Service does not directly commission drug services. Drug Action Teams (DATs) in the community contract local treatment providers to deliver the required treatment. Information on the extent of involvement of major drug agencies is not available centrally.

Dungavel Removal Centre

Annabelle Ewing: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to expand Dungavel Removal Centre. [184572]

Mr. Browne: On 16 March 2004 we announced publicly the decision to create a new building on the Dungavel site designed to hold up to 44 single males which will achieve the capacity of 194 places. In February 2004, work on the construction of that new building began and is now nearing completion. We expect this to be operational during August.

There are no plans to increase the capacity of Dungavel beyond 194 places.

Either-way Cases

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what his estimate is of the proportion of contested cases triable either-way in the magistrates court that resulted in acquittal in (a) the Crown courts and (b) magistrates courts in each of the last five years. [183591]

Paul Goggins: Information collected centrally by the Home Office does not contain details on defendants' plea at magistrates courts (nor therefore data on the number of contested cases).

The available information contained in the table provides figures for the number of defendants who pleaded "not guilty" to a triable either-way offence (where that offence was the principal offence) at the Crown court, and the number who were acquitted, in England and Wales, for the years 1998 to 2002.

Statistics on court proceedings for 2003 will be published in the autumn.
Number of defendants(60) who pleaded "not guilty"(61) at the Crown court, who were acquitted(62) for triable either-way only offences, England and Wales 1998 to 2002

Number of defendants who pleaded not guiltyNumber of defendants who pleaded not guilty who were acquittedProportion of defendants pleading not guilty who were acquitted (Percentage)
199821,50112,57858
199921,32412,84760
200021,49313,47763
200120,86313,23063
200219,07611,77162




1 Table excludes the figures of those defendants who pleaded "not guilty" who were not tried.
2 Not guilty plea to the principal offence.
3 Acquitted—includes, not guilty, no evidence offered, charge withdrawn, judge rules no case to answer.




 
1 Sept 2004 : Column 851W
 


Next Section Index Home Page