Previous Section Index Home Page

1 Nov 2004 : Column 14W—continued

Sea Containers

Patrick Mercer: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many sea containers have arrived at each British sea port in each year since 1997. [194698]

Mr. Jamieson: The available information is as follows:
Thousand

Port1997199819992000200120022003
Aberdeen(2)(2)(2)1121413
Belfast55596061555764
Boston(3)(3)(3)8224
Bristol10111416252930
Cardiff(3)(3)(3)13131115
Clyde991214171823
Felixstowe800857913929936871807
Forth32323340404753
Goole(3)(3)(3)3637269
Grimsby and Immingham79808621235336
Harwich27252434797
Hull73777181694683
Ipswich(2)136121819
Liverpool152156163167159148168
London172205234194243280301
Medway129165160162165172161
Portsmouth(2)(2)(2)(2)171911
Southampton296279301346371403425
Tees and Hartlepool84807414233538
Tyne1012127141613
Warrenpoint8988785


(2) Less than half the final digit shown
(3) Not available
Note:
Information for 1997–99 is not directly comparable with subsequent years because of changes to the reporting system in 2000 (containers carried on ship by shipborne port to port trailers were included in 1997–99, but only partially included from 2000. The ports mainly affected by this change are Grimsby and Immingham, Tees and Hartlepool and London). Estimates have been made of the number of inwards containers in 1997–99, from inwards and outwards traffic combined.





 
1 Nov 2004 : Column 15W
 

Patrick Mercer: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many staff have been employed at each port of entry to inspect and search sea containers in each year since 2001. [194700]

Mr. Jamieson: All ports handling international traffic must meet Government set standards for security. However, the actual number of staff that are employed by a port is a commercial decision for the ports themselves. We therefore do not hold this information centrally.

Security (Clapham Junction)

Patrick Mercer: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on security procedures at Clapham Junction. [194708]

Mr. McNulty: All railways stations are required to comply with certain security standards as set out in the Department for Transport National Railways Security Programme and the Station Security Instruction issued on 27 May 2004 under the terms of the Railways Act 1993. It is not our practice to detail the required security measures or procedures at individual stations for obvious reasons.

Strategic Rail Authority

Mr. Yeo: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he will set a date for the abolition of the Strategic Rail Authority. [194652]

Mr. McNulty: The Secretary of State for Transport said at the time of the publication of the White Paper "The Future of Rail" (July 2004), that the Strategic Rail Authority would be wound up 'probably in the second half of next year'. The exact timing of the closure of the SRA is dependent on the necessary legislation being in place. The Government will introduce legislation as soon as Parliamentary time permits.
 
1 Nov 2004 : Column 16W
 

Vehicle Checks

Mr. McCabe: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many vehicle identity checks under the Vehicle (Crimes) Act 2001 have been recorded in each month since April 2003. [195054]

Mr. Jamieson: The number of vehicle identity checks undertaken each month since the scheme began in April 2003 are recorded in the table.
Number of checks
2003–04
April2
May243
June902
July1,798
August1,846
September2,564
October3,184
November3,030
December2,946
January3,361
February3,597
March3,760
2004–05
April3,111
May2,963
June3,379
July3,338
August3,094
September3,674
October(4)2,505
November
December
January
February
March


(4) To 22 October 2004


Mr. McCabe: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many vehicles have been presented to each test station for vehicle identity checks since April 2003; and what the pass rate is at each test centre. [195055]


 
1 Nov 2004 : Column 17W
 

Mr. Jamieson: The number of vehicle identity checks conducted at each test station and the respective pass rate for each station since the scheme began in April 2003 are listed in the following table.

Very few vehicles fail the vehicle identity check. This was expected as the aim of the scheme was to deter ringing crime rather than detect it.
StationNumber of checksPass rate
Aberdeen145100.0
Aberystwyth62100.0
Bristol1,10699.9
Berwick31100.0
Beverley99099.6
Bicester56499.6
Birmingham3,86699.8
Caernarvon13100.0
Cardiff1,36299.8
Carlisle194100.0
Manchester North4,21699.9
Charlesfield182100.0
Chelmsford3,55599.9
Cowes5298.1
Darlington1,53099.9
Derby1,744100.0
Doncaster3,78099.9
Dumfries127100.0
East Fortune26100.0
Livingston59999.7
London North2,96499.9
Exeter89599.8
Gillingham1,57499.9
Glasgow1,22499.9
Gloucester49299.8
Guildford67199.7
Haverfordwest45100.0
Inverness5698.2
Kidderminster79499.9
Kirkwall15100.0
Lerwick6100.0
Liverpool459100.0
Llandrindon Wells23100.0
Lochgilphead5100.0
Milnthorpe24699.6
London South2,73699.9
Montrose112100.0
Newbury26399.6
Newcastle1,67399.9
Newton Stewart33100.0
Northam SVA23299.6
Norwich931100.0
Perth376100.0
Peterborough1,34299.9
Poole49399.8
Redruth76999.9
Shrewsbury24100.0
Shrewsbury SVA662100.0
Southampton528100.0
Speke83399.9
Stornoway4100.0
Ammanford70499.9
Taunton393100.0
Walton64199.7
Watford (Edmonton)2,151100.0
Wick4100.0
Wrexham778100.0








 
1 Nov 2004 : Column 18W
 

Vehicle Registrations

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has to review the regulations controlling the display of motor vehicles' registration letters and numbers. [194328]

Mr. Jamieson: The regulations that govern the display of motor vehicles' registration letters and numbers were last reviewed in 1999. The British number plate is considered to be one of the clearest in Europe and there are no plans to review the regulations again at present.

ADVOCATE-GENERAL

Cullen Inquiry

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Advocate-General (1) what role she played in the decision to place a 100-year closure on the Cullen Inquiry into the Dunblane tragedy; [193769]

(2) on what basis the decision was taken to place a 100-year closure on the Cullen Inquiry into the Dunblane tragedy; [193770]

(3) what statutory basis was cited in placing a 100-year closure on the Cullen Inquiry. [193771]

The Advocate-General for Scotland: I played no role in the decision to place a 100-year closure on the Cullen Inquiry into the Dunblane tragedy and, accordingly, had no part in any decision regarding closure periods relating to that Inquiry.

Given the above, I was not involved in any citation of a statutory basis for placing a 100-year closure on Cullen Inquiry papers. I understand, however, that there is no statutory basis for the closure of records created by Scottish public bodies. The Public Records (Scotland) Act 1937 ("the 1937 Act") makes provision for the preservation, care and custody of the public records of Scotland. The terms of the legislation are permissive. I understand that the criteria for closures longer than 30 years were defined in the 1993 White Paper on Open Government (Cm 2290) and that the principles set out in that White Paper are relevant in decision-making on disclosure.


Next Section Index Home Page