Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
New clause 18Exercise of functions in relation to children in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
Amendment No. 1, in page 1, line 6, leave out clause 2.
Amendment No. 11, in clause 2, page 2, line 18, leave out 'take reasonable steps to'.
Amendment No. 12, in clause 2, page 2, line 19, leave out 'section' and insert 'Part'.
Amendment No. 44, in clause 4, page 2, line 24, at end insert
Amendment No. 13, in clause 2, page 2, line 31, at end insert
Amendment No. 4, in page 4, line 1, leave out clause 4.
Amendment No. 34, in page 4, line 24, leave out clause 5.
Amendment No. 45, in page 4, line 24, leave out clauses 5 to 7.
Amendment No. 24, in clause 5, page 4, line 29, leave out '(12) of section 2' and insert
Amendment No. 25, in clause 6, page 5, line 6, leave out '(12) of section 2' and insert
Amendment No. 26, in clause 7, page 5, line 38, leave out '(12) of section 2' and insert
Amendment No. 27, in clause 9, page 7, line 7, leave out '2(11) and (12)' and insert
Amendment No. 9, in schedule 1, page 44, line 19, at end insert
Amendment No. 10, in schedule 1, page 45, line 31, leave out
Mrs. Brooke: I think that the consensus has come to an end. I rise to speak to new clause 1 and amendment No. 1, which would delete clause 2, as amended in Committee, to consequential amendments Nos. 24 to 27, and to amendment No. 4, which would leave out clause 4. My hon. Friend the Member for Brecon and Radnorshire (Mr. Williams) very much hopes to speak to new clause 2, and on other issues pertaining particularly to Wales. As we are short of time, it might help if I said at the outset that we want to press new clauses 1 and 2 to a vote.
The Minister will be aware that a wide range of organisations and individuals are enormously disappointed with the amendments to clause 2 that were recently passed in Committee. During the debate, it became apparent that the Government's views on the functions and role of the children's commissioner were
2 Nov 2004 : Column 197
fundamentally different from those who opposed the amendments, with little hope of convergence. Given the widespread welcome for a Children's Commissioner for EnglandI do indeed welcome the conceptit is surely right that we revisit the issues and reflect on the cross-party support given in the other place to a clause similar to new clause 1. Indeed, new clause 1 is also very similar to new clause 13, as proposed by the Conservatives.
As a consequence of the Government's amendments, the children's commissioner now has the function of
That contrasts with the much stronger statement resulting from cross-party amendments made in the other place, which would have given the commissioner the function of
of children. As the Children's Commissioner for Wales said:
"What sort of 'champion' is it that does not advocate for the rights of the group of people they are championing?"
We welcome the fact that the Government accepted at a very early stage an amendment in the other place whereby the commissioner "must"rather than "may"have regard to the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. But the Government also required that the commissioner be concerned "in particular" with the five "outcome goals". The Joint Committee on Human Rights concluded:
"We consider that the confusion engendered by reincorporating in the Bill a duty to have regard both to the Convention and the five outcomes will risk downgrading the Convention from a framework to a background to the Commissioner's work . . . We conclude that it is unnecessary for the five outcomes listed in clause 2(3) as originally introduced to be reinstated. If the Government feels they must, they should be clearly placed within the context of the CRC."
The Minister told the Committee that if the focus were simply on rights, it would limit the work that the commissioner could do on behalf of children. That is a point with which we have considerable difficulty.
There is nothing narrow about the proposed focus on rights and interests. The convention on the rights of the child covers all aspects of childhood and we ratified that convention in 1991. It gives all babies and children a comprehensive set of economic, social, cultural, civil and political rights, 40 in all. Because of constraints on time, I shall not run through them all, but they cover education, health, sexual exploitation, adoption, children in trouble with the law and so forth. The convention provides a wide framework for the children's commissioner and it is not limiting in the way the Minister suggested. It is, indeed, a foundation on which everything else can be built.
We oppose clause 4 because it gives the Secretary of State the power to direct the commissioner to undertake an inquiry. The Government have given assurances that they foresee the power being used only in cases of extreme significance. However, the Secretary of State can already convene such an inquiry under existing powers.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |