Previous Section Index Home Page

16 Nov 2004 : Column 1440W—continued

Prison Service

Mrs. Curtis-Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the
 
16 Nov 2004 : Column 1441W
 
results of the DORE Achievement Centres and dyslexia, dyspraxia and attention deficit treatment programme with the Prison Service in Stafford; and what plans he has to extend the programme to other prisons. [146170]

Paul Goggins: The results of the programme run at Stafford prison are encouraging, albeit on the basis of a very small sample.

The research raises some complex issues and needs a co-ordinated approach to further development involving health, physical education and education
 
16 Nov 2004 : Column 1442W
 
providers. I have asked those responsible for the DORE programme to discuss their work further with the Prison Service.

Mr. Maude: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the real terms change in total spending for the Prison Service was in each of the last 10 years. [169092]

Paul Goggins: The real term changes in total spending for the Prison Service over the last 10 years are given in the following table.
Prison service budget

£ millionReal terms £ million 2003–04 pricesYear on year increase (percentage)Deflators: Index 2003–04=100
1994–951,597.9002,019.46379.125
1995–961,666.9002,047.3111.481.419
1996–971,608.6001,911.655-6.684.147
1997–981,740.8002,016.9865.586.307
1998–991,812.1002,040.7911.288.794
1999–20001,846.4002,035.049-0.390.730
2000–011,909.3602,080.2982.291.783
2001–022,452.7832,606.01725.394.120
2002–032,636.5722,710.0974.097.287
2003–042,361.5732,361.573-12.9100.000
2004–052,486.0742,429.9902.9102.308




Notes:
1. These are figures for the Prison Service.
2. Please note that from 2001–02 onwards figures are on accruals basis. Figures are cash prior to that.
3. Note also that from 2003–04 onwards the figures reflect transfers of functions and funding to Correctional Services/NOMS, including private prisons.




John McDonnell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he intends to publish a business case in respect of contestability plans for the probation and prison services. [192730]

Paul Goggins [holding answer 25 October 2004]: The case for the establishment of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) is outlined in Patrick Carter's independent report "Managing Offenders—Reducing Crime". The draft detailed business case will be presented to the NOMS Programme Board shortly.

Prisoners (Employment)

Tom Cox: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what his latest estimate is of how many hours on average per week a prisoner serving a sentence in a London prison spends in employment; and if he will make a statement. [197715]

Paul Goggins: Prisoners in London establishments spend an average of 9.7 hours a week engaged in work related purposeful activity. The Prison Service continues to provide work opportunities for as many prisoners as possible. The figure is an average for all prisoners in London establishments. These establishments are mainly local prisons which serve the courts, and contain a high proportion of remand prisoners. As remand prisoners are not obliged to undertake work, their numbers bring down the overall average of work related hours. Additionally, local prisons are most likely to experience high levels of overcrowding and the amount of work available for each prisoner will naturally diminish as the population increases.

Prisons

Mrs. Curtis-Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many and what percentage of (a) male and (b) female prisoners have (i) self-harmed, (ii) attempted suicide and (iii) committed suicide while in prison in each of the last five years. [191332]

Paul Goggins: The numbers and percentages of individuals who self-harmed or apparently took their own lives in prisons (1999–2003), are included in the following tables. While the new self-harm reporting system which started in 2003 has improved the consistency with which such incidents are reported, and improved the detail and quality of the information collected, it makes meaningful comparisons across time more difficult.
Table 1: Numbers and proportions of male self-inflicted deaths and self-harm

Male Prison populationNumbers of male self-inflicted deathsPercentage of males who killed themselvesNumbers of males who harmed themselvesPercentage of males who harmed themselves
199961,523860.142,5694
200061,252730.122,9225
200162,560670.113,5106
200266,479860.133,4855
200368,612800.12









 
16 Nov 2004 : Column 1443W
 

Table 2: Numbers and proportions of female self-inflicted deaths and self- harm

Female prison populationNumber of female self-inflicted deathsPercentage of females who killed themselvesNumber of females who harmed themselvesPercentage of females who harmed themselves
19993,24750.152969
20003,35080.2441312
20013,74060.1663217
20024,29990.2190421
20034,425140.32

Note: A new form for reporting self injury (the F213sh) was introduced across the prison estate in December 2002.

Alistair Burt: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to change diets in (a) prisons and (b) young offender institutions, following recent studies on the effects of diet on behaviour. [195768]

Paul Goggins: In 1996, a study was conducted at Her Majesty's Young Offender Institution (HMYOI) Aylesbury by 'Natural Justice', a research charity investigating the relationship between nutrition and criminal behaviour. They reported a significant reduction in offending behaviour amongst young offenders who had taken nutritional supplements.

Half of the young men participating received pills containing vitamins, minerals and essential fatty acids. The other half received placebo or dummy pills. The researchers recorded the number and type of offences each of the prisoners committed in the nine months before they received the pills and in the nine months during the trial. They found that the group that received the supplements committed 25 per cent. fewer offences than those who had been given the placebo.

The results were independently reviewed by the Research, Development and Statistics Directorate (RDS) at the Home Office. RDS acknowledged that the results of the study showed a positive effect on behaviour. However, the number of participants involved was small and the study did not follow through to see whether re-offending reduced or continued once the trainees had left the establishment. This made it very difficult to validate wider implications from the results.

Natural Justice have plans to replicate the project on a much broader scale. Approval was given in October 2002 for Natural Justice to have access to Warren Hill and Stoke Heath if they could satisfy ethical requirements and obtain funding for the research. On similar grounds, the Scottish Prison Service approved access to Polmont.

Beyond this research, other work is taking place to ensure that individual prisoners are encouraged to eat healthily, and that the food provided is nutritious. A partnership between the catering, education and physical education departments in prisons encourages the promotion of high-starch, fibre-rich foods rather than sugary or processed ones, or those which contain too much salt or sugar.

Catering staff are provided with training information and the skills required to produce healthy food. The Prison Service runs nutrition-training courses at intermediate level for prison caterers, which lead to a
 
16 Nov 2004 : Column 1444W
 
formal qualification from the Royal Institute of Public Health. Some establishments involve the local hospital dietician in their menu planning and some have obtained Healthy Eating Awards (Heartbeat) from their local authorities.

The content of meals provided in prisons and young offender institutions is constantly evolving with prison caterers being aware of and trained to provide nutritious and healthy diets. Prisoners and young offenders are increasingly being educated and made aware of the importance of healthy eating.

Mrs. Curtis-Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many and what percentage of prisons offer a 24 hour counselling service; and what the most common reasons are for prisoners using counselling services. [196650]

Paul Goggins: The specific information requested is not available. A wide range of counselling and support mechanisms are available to prisoners. Counselling in drug and substance misuse is provided in every prison establishment as part of the Counselling, Assessment, Referral and Treatment (CARAT) programme. Individual establishments also have arrangements for the provision of professional counselling services through both primary care trusts and local voluntary sector providers. Referrals to outside counselling services can be made through psychology, health care, the chaplaincy and mental health in-reach teams.

In common with arrangements in the community, counselling services are generally provided during normal working hours and not on a 24 hour basis. 24-hour support is, however, normally available to prisoners through listener schemes, whereby prisoners who have been trained by the Samaritans are available to provide emotional support to other prisoners. Prisoners also have access to the Samaritans by telephone.

By their very nature many counselling and support services operate on a strictly confidential basis. While comprehensive information about the reasons for seeking counselling is not available, the areas covered include physical, emotional and sexual abuse; family issues and relationship problems; suicidal and self-harm tendencies; substance abuse; and offending behaviour.

Mrs. Curtis-Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the impact of transferring the prison health service to the national health service on prisoners reporting historical sex abuse. [197438]

Paul Goggins: No such assessment has been made. We expect all prisoners to benefit from the transfer of responsibility for prison health services to the national health service (NHS). When completed in 2006, this
 
16 Nov 2004 : Column 1445W
 
change will represent another significant step towards giving prisoners access to the same range and quality of health services as the general public receives from the NHS.

Bob Russell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether prison regulations permit visits by the visually impaired to be accompanied by guide dogs. [197508]

Paul Goggins: As a service provider, the Prison Service is fully aware of its obligations under the Disability Discrimination Act and seeks to ensure it meets the needs of all visitors, including those with disabilities. Visitors accompanied by an assistance dog are welcome at prison establishments and certainly would not be excluded on this basis. However, a reasonable adjustment may need to be made to accommodate the dog and to ensure there is no distraction to patrol or passive drug dogs on site. For this reason, it is advisable that the prison is notified of any special requirements in advance of the visit.

Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of inmates of each (a) prison and (b) young offenders institution are detained within 50 miles of their homes, broken down by category of prisoners; and what the average (i) stay of inmates and (ii) length of time served by prison officers in each establishment is. [198200]

Paul Goggins: The proportion of each prison's population with a home address or committal court address within 50 miles of the establishment is as follows:
PrisonProportion of prison's population held under 50 miles from home area (Percentage)Main prisoner category accommodated at prison
Acklington53C
Albany18B
Altcourse75A
Ashfield45Young Offenders
Ashwell35C
Askham Grange27Women
Aylesbury60Young Offenders
Bedford85B
Belmarsh93B
Birmingham94B
Blakenhurst93B
Blantyre House47Women
Blundeston11C
Brinsford92Young Offenders
Bristol85B
Brixton94B
Brockhill81Women
Bronzefield65Women
Buckley Hall39Women
Bullingdon66B
Bullwood Hall45Women
Camp Hill27C
Canterbury55C
Cardiff84B
Castington51Young Offenders
Channings Wood21C
Chelmsford92B
Coldingley82C
Cookham Wood70Women
Dartmoor25C
Deerbolt24Young Offenders
Doncaster95B
Dorchester72B
Dovegate32B
Downview79Women
Drake Hall40Women
Durham69B
East Sutton Park77Women
Eastwood Park43Women
Edmunds Hill36Women
Elmley72B
Erlestoke37C
Everthorpe63C
Exeter63B
Featherstone89C
Feltham86Young Offenders
Ford31D
Forest Bank93B
Foston Hall39Women
Frankland26A
Full Sutton12A
Garth59B
Gartree21B
Glen Parva74Young Offenders
Gloucester89B
Grendon/Spring Hill32B
Guys Marsh35C
Haverigg9C
Hewell Grange91D
Highdown93B
Highpoint17C
Hindley94Young Offenders
Hollesley Bay16D
Holloway88Women
Holme House88B
Hull74B
Huntercombe60Young Offenders
Kingston10B
Kirkham82D
Kirklevington Grange45D
Lancaster68C
Lancaster Farms47Young Offenders
Latchmere House85D
Leeds94B
Leicester80B
Lewes79B
Leyhill31D
Lincoln84B
Lindholme62C
Littlehey29C
Liverpool76B
Long Lartin20A
Low Newton44Women
Lowdham Grange17Women
Maidstone83C
Manchester91B
Moorland71C
Moorland Open68D
Morton Hall11Women
Mount84C
New Hall50Women
North Sea Camp16D
Northallerton36Young Offenders
Norwich63B
Nottingham91B
Onley50Young Offenders
Parc72B
Parkhurst13B
Pentonville96B
Portland5Young Offenders
Preston90B
Ranby72C
Reading72Young Offenders
Risley80C
Rochester88Young Offenders
Rye Hill28B
Send66Women
Shepton Mallet8C
Shrewsbury90B
Stafford74C
Standford Hill43D
Stocken61C
Stoke Heath70Young Offenders
Styal81Women
Sudbury50D
Swaleside20B
Swansea83B
Swinfen Hall59Young Offenders
Thorn Cross62Young Offenders
Usk/Prescoed50C
Verne7C
Wakefield25B
Wandsworth93B
Warren Hill14Young Offenders
Wayland18C
Wealstun56C
Weare4C
Wellingborough54C
Werrington80Young Offenders
Wetherby74Young Offenders
Whatton40C
Whitemoor4B
Winchester84B
Wolds64C
Woodhill84B
Wormwood Scrubs91B
Wymott74C

 
16 Nov 2004 : Column 1447W
 

Information on the length of time a prisoner spends at each establishment is not recorded centrally and could be obtained only at a disproportionate cost.

The average length of time Officer Grade staff spend working at each establishment is given in the following table. Information about prison custody officers at contracted prisons is not held centrally.
EstablishmentAverage length of service of staff at establishment (years)
Acklington8.3
Albany8.3
Ashwell6.0
Askham Grange3.0
Aylesbury4.7
Bedford5.4
Belmarsh5.7
Birmingham5.1
Blakenhurst5.2
Blantyre House8.1
Blundeston7.3
Brinsford7.1
Bristol7.0
Brixton6.8
Brockhill6.2
Buckley Hall5.8
Bullingdon4.6
Bullwood Hall4.6
Camp Hill7.6
Canterbury8.1
Cardiff5.2
Castington6.5
Channings Wood5.6
Chelmsford5.9
Coldingley5.1
Cookham Wood5.1
Dartmoor6.0
Deerbolt6.4
Dorchester4.5
Dover6.7
Downview5.0
Drake Hall3.8
Durham4.3
East Sutton Park5.1
Eastwood Park5.0
Edmunds Hill1.1
Elmley5.5
Erlestoke5.9
Everthorpe8.2
Exeter5.1
Featherstone7.9
Feltham4.8
Ford7.8
Foston Hall3.6
Frankland7.5
Full Sutton7.1
Garth6.9
Gartree6.7
Glen Parva9.0
Gloucester4.8
Grendon5.5
Guys Marsh6.3
Haslar6.5
Haverigg6.5
Hewell Grange7.2
High Down4.6
Highpoint5.5
Hindley5.2
Hollesley Bay6.6
Holloway4.9
Holme House8.3
Hull4.9
Huntercombe4.0
Kingston7.9
Kirkham6.7
Kirklevington Grange6.4
Lancaster3.5
Lancaster Farms7.1
Latch mere House5.5
Leeds4.9
Leicester5.4
Lewes6.5
Leyhill2.9
Lincoln5.0
Lindholme8.5
Littlehey6.5
Liverpool6.4
Long Lartin5.7
Low Newton7.0
Maidstone5.2
Manchester5.8
Moorland6.0
Morton Hall3.6
New Hall6.2
North Sea Camp7.3
Northallerton6.3
Norwich6.4
Nottingham3.8
Onley6.9
Parkhurst8.2
Pentonville5.1
Portland7.3
Preston5.7
Ranby6.1
Reading6.2
Risley5.5
Rochester4.9
Send4.0
Shepton Mallet6.7
Shrewsbury6.7
Stafford3.7
Standford Hill6.0
Stocken6.8
Stoke Heath6.9
Styal4.8
Sudbury10.2
Swaleside4.5
Swansea4.7
Swinfen Hall5.5
The Mount4.8
The Verne9.4
Thorn Cross8.9
Usk/Prescoed8.5
Wakefield4.4
Wandsworth5.1
Warren Hill1.2
Wayland7.0
Wealstun7.3
Weare4.3
Wellingborough4.3
Werrington5.3
Wetherby4.5
Whatton6.6
Whitemoor6.2
Winchester4.1
Woodhill5.1
Wormwood Scrubs6.7
Wymott7.6

 
16 Nov 2004 : Column 1450W
 

Mrs. Cheryl Gillan: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list prison refurbishment projects by establishment that have been undertaken since April 2000; and what the (a) date of completion or projected completion date, (b) cost of the refurbishment and (c) number of places added was in each case. [198473]

Paul Goggins: The projects in the following table are those that have been classified as major refurbishment work. Projects classified as maintenance are not included.

The primary objective of refurbishment projects is to modernise buildings and keep them fit for purpose; they are not as a general rule intended to produce additional places. A small number of places may have been created or taken out of use by individual projects but the net effect on number of places is broadly neutral.
Refurbishment. since April 2000ProjectCost (£000)Completion Date
Ashwellreplace buildings—Phase 12,980Sep-00
Ashwellreplace buildings—Phase 21,859Oct-01
Ashwellreplace buildings—Phase 3721Aug-02
Ashwellreplace buildings—Phase 41,411Aug-03
Aylesburyrefurb/repair B and C Wings9,337Mar-05
Camp HillSs Edward and Patrick Wings2,336Sep-00
Camp HillBs.Thomas and James Wings4,639Nov-03
Cardiffrepairs to F and A Wings5,876Jul-04
Durhamrefurbish B Wing6,477Mar-03
Durhamrefurbish D and E Wings8,017Aug-05
Gartreerefurbish A Wing/Gate entry3,215May-02
GartreeC Wing—Phase 1 /Phase 22,884Oct-03
GartreeE Wing refurbishment1,043May-04
Kingston/Portsmouthrefurbish C Wing/CPIG(60)1,987Mar-05
Kirkhamreplace living units4,094May-03
Lincolnrefurbish B Wing5,067Nov-02
Long Lartinupgrade C and D Wings5,072May-04
Portlandcare and custody unit1,659Aug-03
Portlandrefurbish living accommodation14,471Nov-06
Prestonrefurbish D Wing3,357May-04
Prestonrefurbish C Wing5,147May-06
Swansearefurbish B Wing2,207Dec-04
Wakefieldrefurbish C Wing/New education9,330Aug-01
Wakefieldrefurbish B Wing9,726Dec-04
Wealstunreplace accommodation-Phase 29,193May-05


(60) CPIG Crown Premises Inspection Group (Fire)


The information supplied has been collected within the Property Services Group of Her Majesty's Prison Service, which does not deal directly with refurbishments carried out within the Private Estate. As the establishments within the Private Estate have not been running long enough for the need to modernise, it is unlikely that any large scale refurbishments have been planned so far, although some upgrading work may have been carried out at local level.

Tom Cox: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether all prisons in England and Wales have a race relations officer in service; and what action he is taking to promote such a position. [197718]

Paul Goggins: All establishments must appoint a race relations liaison officer to provide information to staff and prisoners on national and local policies and to monitor race relations within the establishment. Race relations liaison officers are allocated a core minimum of eight hours a week, with additional hours dependent on the nature of the establishment. An increasing number of establishments have also appointed full-time diversity officers. These are usually prisons that are large, have a large minority ethnic prisoner population, or are in an isolated location making community links difficult to organise.
 
16 Nov 2004 : Column 1451W
 

The name and role of the race relations liaison officer is widely publicised to staff and prisoners. Many establishments display photographs of the race relation liaison officer and also members of the establishment's race relations management team.


Next Section Index Home Page