Previous Section Index Home Page

18 Nov 2004 : Column 1732W—continued

Battersea Power Station

Tom Cox: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will make a statement on his Department's proposed redevelopment of Battersea Power Station. [198950]

Phil Hope: The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has no proposals to redevelop Battersea Power Station. Planning applications from Parkview Limited, owners of Battersea Power Station, for refurbishment of the building and redevelopment of the site, were considered by the London borough of Wandsworth in October 2004. The Government Office for London issued a holding direction to enable a last minute request for call-in from a third party to be considered. The holding direction was subsequently removed and the applications were not called in, leaving the council free to determine them.

Compulsory Purchase Orders

Mr. Dismore: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will (a) remove and (b) limit the liability of sheriffs for damages claims in the event of improper enforcement of compulsory purchase orders. [199248]

Keith Hill: My right hon. Friend the Deputy Prime Minister has no such proposals in hand. This is a matter which is normally dealt with through indemnity insurance.

Fire Service

Mr. Clifton-Brown: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister (1) if he will establish an independent review into the future of regional fire control centres; [199333]

(2) how many representations (a) for and (b) against a regional fire control centre he has received from Gloucestershire residents. [199334]

Mr. Raynsford: It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.

Government Buildings (Disabled Access)

Tom Cox: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether all Government buildings in his Department within the Greater London area are fully accessible to disabled people; and if he will make a statement. [199321]

Keith Hill: The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has had an independent accessibility audit carried out in each of its Greater London Buildings.

Where deficiencies were highlighted by these audits, reasonable adjustments have been made to make the buildings accessible to disabled staff and visitors.

Housing

Helen Jones: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many homeless households are awaiting accommodation in each local authority in the north-west. [193048]

Keith Hill: A breakdown of homeless households in various forms of temporary accommodation at the end of June 2004, either pending a decision on their application or awaiting the allocation of a settled home, as reported by local authorities in the North West Government Office region is tabled as follows. As can be seen from the table, around half of households in temporary accommodation at the end of the quarter were either in local authority/Housing Association stock or accommodation leased from the private sector.
 
18 Nov 2004 : Column 1733W
 

Homeless households in temporary accommodation(6) in the north west region as at 30 June 2004

Local authorityBed and breakfast (including shared annexe)Hostels (including women's refuges)LA/HA stockPrivate sector leased (by LA or RSL)
North West Region estimates2509301,32040
Percentage of total934481
Allerdale6400
Barrow-in-Furness2070
Blackburn with Darwen01000
Blackpool2952130
Bolton014500
Burnley619101
Bury01500
Carlisle04000
Chester24160
Chorley02300
Congleton0030
Copeland1050
Crewe and Nantwich4070
Eden20153
Ellesmere Port and Neston120220
Fylde(8)(8)(8)(8)
Halton00340
Hyndburn0500
Knowsley113200
Lancaster(8)(8)(8)(8)
Liverpool015500
Macclesfield0112240
Manchester502033420
Oldham17100
Pendle5200
Preston037119
Ribble Valley0300
Rochdale114160
Rossendale0000
Salford423300
Sefton0050
South Lakeland013470
South Ribble9500
St Helens1038150
Stockport03700
Tameside1419280
Trafford021560
Vale Royal24497
Warrington(8)(8)(8)(8)
West Lancashire0100
Wigan710390
Wirral1210
Wyre17100

Local authorityOther types (including private landlord)Total in TA secured by local authority"Homeless at home"(7) awaiting accommodation as at 30 June
North West Region estimates2302,7703,520
Percentage of total8100
Allerdale01015
Barrow-in-Furness093
Blackburn with Darwen212142
Blackpool81027
Bolton56981
Burnley64266
Bury015(8)
Carlisle0400
Chester93118
Chorley32629
Congleton037
Copeland060
Crewe and Nantwich0110
Eden12114
Ellesmere Port and Neston4470
Fylde(8)(8)1
Halton0340
Hyndburn0578
Knowsley236123
Lancaster(8)(8)(8)
Liverpool0155162
Macclesfield02356
Manchester100695215
Oldham0720
Pendle0717
Preston05712
Ribble Valley588
Rochdale058130
Rossendale000
Salford075745
Sefton0569
South Lakeland0609
South Ribble3044167
St Helens265114
Stockport643118
Tameside1576515
Trafford582234
Vale Royal268889
Warrington(8)(8)(8)
West Lancashire010
Wigan0560
Wirral04129
Wyre01818


(6) Households in temporary accommodation pending completion of inquiries into their application, or after being accepted, under homelessness legislation.
(7) Households designated as "Homeless at Home" have remained in their existing accommodation and have the same rights to suitable alternative accommodation as those in accommodation arranged by authorities.
3 Data not reported.
Source:
ODPM P1E homelessness returns (quarterly)





 
18 Nov 2004 : Column 1735W
 

The latest quarterly Statistical Release on statutory homelessness, published by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister on 13 September, presented analyses up to the end of the second quarter of 2004. Information on households in temporary accommodation at local authority level is contained in an associated Supplementary Table. These are available in the Library of the House, and via the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's website.

Mr. Love: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister (1) if he will break down the low cost home ownership units planned for (a) Enfield and (b) Greater London in the Housing Corporation's 2004 to 2006 approved development programme by (i) conventional shared ownership, (ii) key worker shared ownership, (iii) homebuy and (iv) other forms of low cost home ownership; [199222]

(2) if he will break down the low cost home ownership units planned for (a) Enfield and (b) Greater London in the Housing Corporation's 2004 to 2006 approved development programme by (i) one-bed, (ii) two-bed, (iii) three-bed and (iv) four-bed and more. [199223]

Keith Hill: It has not proved possible to respond to my hon. Friend in the time available before Prorogation.

Mr. Love: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many shared ownership properties were sold in (a) Enfield and (b) Greater London in each year since 1997; and how many of those properties were purchased by someone (i) already in social housing in that area, (ii) on the single housing register in that area and (iii) a key worker. [199226]


 
18 Nov 2004 : Column 1736W
 

Keith Hill: A table containing this information (for every local authority in England) has been made available in the Library of the House.

The table includes, for each financial year from 1997–98 to 2003–04 and for every English local authority and for each Government office region:

Note that the figures relate to the sales of initial shares only. Subsequent purchases of additional equity are not included.

It should be noted that figures on the number of key workers that bought shared ownership properties during the period 1997–98 to 2003–04 are not available. This is because the purchaser's occupation was not collected as part of CORE Sales during this period.


Next Section Index Home Page