Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Fourth Special Report


Fourth Special Report


1. The Constitutional Affairs Committee published its Second Report of Session 2003-04 on Asylum and Immigration Appeals on 2 March 2004, as HC 211-I. The Government response was published on 9 June 2004, as Cm 6236. The Chairman of the Committee wrote to the Lord Chancellor on 10 June 2004 requesting clarification of certain issues. The exchange of correspondence was published as the Committee's Third Special Report of Session 2003-04 (HC 868) on 21 July 2004. Subsequently the Chairman of the Committee wrote a further letter to the Department about the issue of unique identification numbers for particular cases. This letter is printed as Appendix 1 to this Special Report. The Minister's response to that letter is printed as Appendix 2.

2. We note the reasons cited by the Minister for not acting more swiftly in relation to setting up a system of unique identification numbers for individual cases. We find it hard to believe that with more effort the various departments involved could not set up a system using a unique identification number for each case. Although the information technology may not yet be in place to link up automatically the various different systems used, it should be possible for a single reference point to be established from which unique identification numbers for individual cases could be obtained by e-mail or telephone, so that a sequential list of such references could be constructed. These unique identification numbers would significantly assist in the scrutiny of individual cases.

3. It is the common experience of Members of Parliament when dealing with constituency cases relating to asylum and other matters where more than one Department is involved that it is very difficult to get proper coordination between officials. The delay caused by the muddle over which file relates to which case can materially affect the outcome in situations where there is a pressing need for someone to be allowed to come to the United Kingdom—for example, when a relative is gravely ill.

4. As the Minister points out in his reply, use of unique identification numbers is a long-term strategy. However, it should be possible also to have an interim solution. We will return to this issue in the near future when we take oral evidence from the Department.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 22 October 2004