Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 120-121)

20 JANUARY 2004

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE OUSELEY, MISS KATE ESHUN AND MR NARESH KUMAR

  Q120 Chairman: If the figures are available, it would be interesting for us.

  Sir Duncan Ouseley: If it is available, it would be interesting. Some of them we lose sight of straight away. We do have a system, if we realise . . . Supposing the adjudicator has made a howler, we did not pick it up and the statutory review court says, "This is a howler, you should have picked it up," they do go back virtually automatically—the parties are given a very short period of time in which to say why it should not go back straight away to the adjudicator. So there is a handful that will drop out of the system. Apart from that, I will inquire if we have result-based decisions on statutory review and let you know if I can find it.

  Q121 Chairman: And maybe the time involved—because that is another argument, of course, that there can be endless delays.

  Sir Duncan Ouseley: Yes.

  Chairman: Sir Duncan, Miss Eshun, Mr Kumar, thank you very much indeed for your help this morning. We are very grateful.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 March 2004