Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Written Evidence


Annex A

  The following is the text of a press release issued by the Law Society and Shelter on 23 December 2003

  "Housing crisis at Christmas as legal aid system fails poorest in society.

  Hundreds of people are being let down by the legal aid system as they struggle to keep a roof over their heads or resolve housing disputes say the Law Society and Shelter.

  Solicitors and advice agencies are being inundated with requests for help from people faced with eviction orders, neglectful landlords or housing benefit errors by local authorities.

  There are now significant areas of England and Wales where people are unable to find legal aid advisers to take their cases up. The problem is particularly acute in the North East, Manchester, Kent and South London.

  Many law firms and advice agencies cannot take on new cases because of Government cutbacks. Spending on legal aid for family, housing, and employment issues has been slashed by fourteen percent in the last three years. In some areas as much as fifteen percent of legal aid expenditure on housing is spent sorting out incorrect housing benefit payments.

  Commenting on the deteriorating situation, Janet Paraskeva, Law Society Chief Executive, said: "Failure to get good quality housing advice can lead to family, debt and employment problems. The legal aid system is being strangled by red tape and under-investment. The poorest people in society are unable to fight injustice and improve their lives because far too often they cannot find a legal aid adviser to represent them."

  Adam Sampson, Director of Shelter, said: "It is clearly unacceptable for anyone in a modern society to be denied legal representation—justice must not become a reserve for those who can afford it. The Government must act fast and must act now to make sure resources are available to make justice truly accessible to all and especially to those who are at risk of homelessness."

Notes to editors

  Government spending on civil legal aid —family, housing, employment, welfare law—has been cut from 564 million pounds in 1999-2000 to 483 million in 2002-03.

  Details of people who can describe the problems they have had trying to get legal advice are available from the Law Society Press Office. Solicitors in south London can talk about how they are struggling to cope with demand for housing advice and unable to help people facing homelessness. Solicitors at the only law firm in a large area of the North East providing housing advice will talk about why they are set to withdraw from this work. Solicitors in Preston can describe how no law firms were able to provide housing advice for several weeks and the problems this caused. There are also many other regional examples."

  The following is a detailed analysis of the provision of housing advice in the four areas featured in The Law Society and Shelter's December press release.

SOUTH LONDON

  There are 72 specialist housing advice providers funded by the Legal Services Commission in South London. Providers who hold Legal Services Commission contracts in other categories of law can also give housing advice under the terms of their contracts.

  We allocate the provision of advice across all the London boroughs in accordance with the identified need. The vast majority of provision is targeted in the inner South London boroughs of Lambeth, Southwark and Wandsworth.

  Most contracts are running well, ie the number of cases being taken on is in line with allocated provision. While there is currently no provision in Merton, clients living there can seek advice in neighbouring boroughs, as there are good transport links. From April 2004 we intend to fund a specialist housing advice provider in Merton.

  Some providers in South London had reported that they were beginning to run out of allocated cases. However, when we offered an increase in the number of allocated cases in November 2003, we received few applications.

  We take the provision of housing advice extremely seriously. Although we consider the current provision in South London to be adequate, we are working to improve it further and it is one of our priority areas for an increase in contracts from April 2004.

  In addition, we are working with others to understand some of the triggers which cause a need for housing advice and to devise effective solutions to improve access. For example:

    —  We have set up a working group to examine ways in which housing benefits administration can be improved in order to prevent possession cases. This working group is chaired by the Commission's Regional Director and includes representatives from the Department for Constitutional Affairs, the Department for Work and Pensions and the Association of London Government.

    —  We have supported Neighbourhood Renewal-funded projects in South London that look at improving the take-up of housing and other welfare benefits in order to maximise the income of vulnerable tenants and others, with the aim of reducing problems caused by rent arrears.

    —  We are working in partnership with Shelter and the Greater London Authority to develop a Housing Advice Strategy for London.

KENT

  Housing advice in Kent is mainly provided by not-for-profit advice agencies. The Legal Services Commission has housing contracts worth over £250,000 with five advice agencies. These advice agencies are: Shelter Ashford (which provides outreach services in the Folkestone area), Shelter Medway, Shelter Housing Advice Hastings, Canterbury Housing Advice and Tunbridge Wells Citizens Advice Bureau. This amounts to over 5,000 hours of advice provision in Kent alone.

  All these advice agencies are located in large conurbations, which have good public transport links to other towns. Only a small number of housing cases in Kent need to be referred to a solicitors' firm. Therefore, until recently we have considered it unnecessary to contract with a solicitors firm for housing advice. Solicitors' firms with contracts in other categories of law are doing housing work under contract tolerances to support the advice agencies. In response to the recent need for specialist housing advice, we expect to have a housing contract with a solicitors' firm from April 2004.

MANCHESTER

  The Legal Services Commission's three largest contracts with Shelter are in the North Western region. The Co-ordinator of Shelter Greater Manchester is a member of our independent North Western Regional Legal Services Committee, which advises the Legal Services Commission on unmet legal need locally. The Committee has not indicated any concerns over a shortage of housing contractors in Preston or Manchester.

  We have allocated almost 4,000 annual housing cases for the North West. Only 2,834 cases have been started since April 2003, and we currently have an unused allocation of 1,000 housing cases, though we expect these to be used by the end of the financial year.

  We plan to increase the allocation of housing cases in the North West to as much as 4,300 from April 2004. This will allow existing contractors to continue their work as well as allowing for new contracts as part of the current bidding round.

NORTH EAST

  The Legal Services Commission has a contract with Capita Assistance to provide housing advice over the telephone in the North East.

  South Tyneside is in close proximity to Newcastle, Sunderland and Gateshead, which have very good public transport links. The borough has allocated nearly 1,500 housing cases in 2003/4. We expect only around 1,300 of this allocation to be used by April 2004. We also expect nearly 1,000 housing cases to be started under contract tolerances.

  When the solicitors' firm in South Tyneside that has indicated it will withdraw from the CLS has done so, we plan to offer an outreach service from a neighbouring borough.

  There is currently no specialist face-to-face housing adviser in Northumberland. This situation will soon be rectified as we are awarding housing contracts to a local solicitors' firm and a not-for-profit advice agency.

Legal Services Commission

January 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 19 July 2004