Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 237 - 239)

TUESDAY 27 JANUARY 2004

SPORT ENGLAND

  Chairman: Mr Carter, Mr Draper, we would like to welcome you both very much indeed here this morning. Mr Wyatt will start the questioning.

  Q237  Derek Wyatt: Good morning. Obviously there has been some apprehension, both this morning and last week in sessions, about the potential Olympic Lottery and the implications it has for Sport England. Can we just clear up this business whether it can start before and after this Guardian story?

  Mr Carter: I think I could give you my understanding. I do not think it is definitive. My understanding is that the IOC will resolve, because they own the brand, that the brand cannot be used until the city where the games is going to has been chosen. It would seem logical.

  Q238  Derek Wyatt: The more interesting question is the impact that the Olympics might have on Sport England's budget per se. I remember we had Trevor Brooking in here saying he needed £5.4 billion to repair the swimming pool and that that would not be possible. At the time we were not doing very well at swimming, but we are doing much better at swimming now. What are your anxieties about the fact that you will lose more money?

  Mr Draper: I think in terms of the cash flow, we have cash flow through now until 2009, and we have built in a commitment of £158 million up to 2009. Also, whilst we cannot project through to 2012, there would be a commitment from Sport England in total of around £280 million. So, put in a wider context, that is about 20% of our overall funds that we have cash flowed through, 40% of the remaining money would go to local community projects and around 30% going to our national programme supporting elite athletes and national governing bodies. So traditionally 85% of our investment has gone into local community projects. We have to make sure there is a balance. There is no point in having a fantastic Olympic Games if we are going to inspire a whole nation to get involved in sport and physical activity only to walk into their local communities and see run down facilities with no coaches, and so on. So it is about twin-track investment, but I think our major concern is the 63% overall decline in lottery funding that we have seen and we have to cash flow into 2009.

  Q239  Derek Wyatt: Given that some of us on this side feel the Olympics is such a big thing it should not be a lottery and that it breaches the additionality, how then do we develop, as it were, in your own words, you know, more sport when you have got less money? Is it not the responsibility of the Government to come forward with extra money for sport?

  Mr Carter: Absolutely. Sport will only flourish if it has investment. So the question will be how do we get that money? That is a question the Government will have to face. Will the money therefore come from the Exchequer, if we are to create a successful sporting nation?


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 25 March 2004