Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Annex 6

Letter from Lord Renfrew of Kairmsthorn to the Rt Hon Tessa Jowell MP,

the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, dated 12 May 2003

PROTECTION OF IRAQ'S NATIONAL HERITAGE

  Thank you very much for your helpful letter of 5 May which has been forwarded to me in Athens. I am asking my secretary in Cambridge to send this reply on to you.

  It is indeed helpful that Sir Neil MacGregor and colleagues at the British Museum are working with international colleagues to encourage a co-ordinated response to the unfortunate looting of the Iraqi National Museum in Baghdad.

  May I first welcome in particular the two last paragraphs of your letter, in which you express the Government's intention to ensure that the element of legal protection for Iraqi antiquities currently provided by the existing UN sanctions Will remain in place when those more general sanctions are lifted. It is extremely helpful that the Government supports the UNESCO statement of 29 April on that subject.

  This is a welcome and constructive statement of the Government's intentions in this matter. and we shall look forward to seeing how the matter is handled in the course of the discussions on the lifting of the existing sanctions which are now beginning at the UN Security Council.

  I note in your second paragraph that the MOD did consult with the archaeological community before the conflict started, and recall that in your speech on April 29 at the British Museum you stated that these consultations had taken place with persons from the University of Newcastle and University College London. I am not aware of any individuals with specialist knowledge of Iraqi antiquities currently at the University of Newcastle, nor have I been able to identify which specialist at University College, London was involved in such consultations. When the history of these unfortunate events comes to be written these matters will perhaps be clarified, and the lack of any direct consultations between Government representatives and the officials of the British School of Archaeology at Iraq who had taken a number of steps to contact them may be explained. The apparent failure to respond to such approaches, including my own letter to the Prime Minister of 11 February, remains a matter for concern and puzzlement.

  Allow me, however, to end on a positive note, and to say how much the archaeological community do welcome the measures which you yourself have taken since those unfortunate events, and to stress the importance which will be attached to the assurances given in the last two paragraphs of your letter.

11 September 2003





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 16 December 2003