Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


10.  Memorandum submitted by FindStolenArt

SECTION 1—INTRODUCTION

  FindStolenArt.com Ltd was founded in May 2000 by student—David Todd and operates as a non-profit organisation.

  FindStolenArt was developed with the aim of assisting Police Forces, across the United Kingdom, in the recovery and return of stolen antiques.

  Since the outset the service has remained free to the police service.

  FindStolenArt.com is the first of its kind to allow the public and related organisations to search a database for information concerning stolen and recovered antiques.

  The database and its layout has been constructed for ease of use. It has been designed bearing in mind that the system itself is to be used by police officers and its development has been shaped over time with input from the police and a variety of related organizations.

  Approximately 27 police forces are currently actively using the website as an open and interactive database for stolen and recovered antiques. In particular Devon & Cornwall and Avon & Somerset police have used our database services extensively.

  All police forces are registered onto the Website and have the ability to use the system, it is certain that with the BBC behind the project the number of police officers and the frequency with which they use the website will increase considerably.

  The website is subject to network effects, the more people that use the website the more useful it becomes to others and the likelihood that valuables are recovered and returned also increases significantly.

  Various organisations including museum security councils and the national trust, strongly believe that the service we provide is long overdue.

  This project has been undertaken and developed non commercially but as a valuable service to the British public to help contend with the theft of antiques.

  Use of the database

  1. Designed as an easy to use system for police officers.

  2. The website facilitates greater co-ordination between due diligence officers.

  3. The fact that the database is online, means that it acts as an efficient means of circulating information about stolen items.

  4. The database facilitates communication and cross force liaison, by allowing officers to view items that have been stolen from particular regions over time.

Advantages of an online database

  The Website allows officers to make direct entries into the database using the Internet (www). Presenting an efficient and effective use of police resources in terms of the amount of time and money saved through using the system.

    —  Faster processing of information

    —  Quicker circulation within minutes rather than days

    —  Reducing the need for paperwork

    —  Direct control of items entered into the database

    —  Accessible from multiple locations

    —  Maintain a database and circulate information simultaneously

Supporting Policing Requirements

  FindStolenArt supports policing requirements, to the effect that it saves time and manpower. There are various options open to the police officer taking the report of crime. The most suitable of the following options can be chosen.

  (1) Input the items directly onto the database via the website.

  (2) Pass the details to his crime officer to upload on his behalf.

  (3) Send the item and theft details to FindStolenArt by post or email if the officer does not have access to a PC. However this method is not encouraged and is rarely used because of the increased implementation of IT within the police.

  There are also no restrictions on the value of an antique, for it to be included in the database.

Other Private Databases

  There are established offline database for stolen art however they operate with a number of highly significant number of failings. These organisations are profit-orientated and highly commercial. Although they have corporate websites they do not allow access to their databases via the internet.

    —  An offline database cannot be viewed by anyone other than employees of the respective company. This means that the police, public, related organisation do not have access to those databases and cannot input items into those databases themselves. Also they cannot visually see the items but have to rely on descriptions over the telephone in the reporting or searching of an item.

    —  These databases charge the British public who have been the victims of a crime expensive fees to log details of the lost items. FindStolenArt.com was created to respond to such unfair treatment and to provide a more effective means of circulating and identifying stolen and returnable property.

    —  Other databases have set limits to the value of a stolen item that can be displayed on the database and so items that may be antique but below £200 will not be circulated. FindStolenArt.com has also responded to that failing.

    —  Individual police officers are increasingly reluctant to work with such organisations because of the failings in the service as are victims of crime because of the high costs involved. They therefore have to rely on contracts ties with the insurance industry for business.

SECTION 2—ACCESS LEVELS AND PROTECTION

Access levels to members of the public—Browsers

  Full access to the records in the database is available only to authorised users and not members of the public.

  Members of the public are only able to browse and search the database by keyword but do not have authorised access to the database and can not make any changes to the database.

Access levels to police forces and authorized personnel—Catalogers

  The ability to make entries into the database is restricted to authorised users only. Police forces have been allocated a username and password via their assigned due diligence officers. This level of access enables police forces to manage their account which includes the ability to enter, edit and remove items from the database.

  Police forces are also able to browse through the accounts of other police forces to search through items that have been stolen in a specific region.

  Users are given only three attempts to supply the correct username and password after which time they are automatically barred from the Account Section of the website. This is a preventative measure against unauthorised access to the database.

Administrators

  Individuals who are to manage the overall system are able to control all aspects of the database including the access status of users.

Protection against false reports and claims

  Stolen items will only be uploaded onto the database if the details of the theft have been reported to the police and a verifiable Crime Reference Number can be supplied.

  All entries into the database require a crime reference number, the date of theft and the contact details of the officer in charge of the case.

Protection offered to persons reporting stolen and recovered property

  Private personal information regarding the identity and details of the theft victim are not stored at all on the database.

  The police officer in charge of the case is left to maintain correspondence with the aggrieved person.

SECTION 3—COMPANY STAFF AND OPERATIONAL LEVELS

Current Staff

  Director of Operations — David Todd, Management Studies (BA) Hons.

  Police Liaison Officer — Stan Smith, Ex Greater Manchester Police Officer, with 30 years of service.

Financial Backing

  Financial backing was provided by private individuals, who have previously been the victims of art theft. The majority of the contributions were made by Mr Edward Todd, father of Mr David Todd.

  The development of the Website and the resources used in getting the system used have been considerable. However now that the system has been developed it now operates with minimal operating costs. Police liaison, management of the database and administration costs takes an average of 4 hours per week.

Recovery rate

  To date, approximately 11% of stolen items that have appeared on the database, have since been recovered. However we are not always informed of successful recoveries made by the police.

Return Rate

  To date approximately 14% of recovered items featured on the database have been returned to the rightful owner by the police.

SECTION 4 — BASIC FEATURES

Browser Compatibility

  FindStolenArt.com supports both Microsoft's Internet Explorer and Netscape browsers, version 4.0 or higher, running on all platforms.

Search Facilities

  The database has full text searching capabilities and is searchable by category or by Keyword. To complete a keyword search the user can enter a word or collection of words into the text search box

Images

  Pictures can be uploaded with each description and these pictures can be viewed in varying sizes. Clicking on a thumbnail picture will open a window that displays a larger picture of the item.

Descriptions

  All of the items in the FindStolenArt database are catalogued using the Object ID international standard for describing cultural objects. It has been developed through the collaboration of the museum community, police and customs agencies, the art trade, insurance industry, and valuers of art and antiques.

  The Object ID project was initiated by the J. Paul Getty Trust in 1993 and the standard was launched in 1997. It is being promoted by major law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, Scotland Yard and Interpol; museum, cultural heritage, art trade and art appraisal organisations; and insurance companies.

  Having established the descriptive standard, the Object ID project now helps to combat art theft by encouraging use of the standard and by bringing together organisations around the world that can encourage its implementation.

2 December 2003





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 16 December 2003