Select Committee on Regulatory Reform Eleventh Report


7 Matters raised under S.O. 141(5)

Handling of the proposal[139]

228. As we have commented above, this is the largest and most complex proposal for a regulatory reform order to be introduced under the 2001 Act. It has been introduced while the Fire and Rescue Services Bill has been completing its passage through Parliament, and there are elements of the proposal which was originally consulted upon which are now due to be enacted by means of that Bill rather than by means of the proposed Order.[140]

229. The reforms of fire safety legislation have therefore followed a twin legislative track. The Minister told us that a conscious decision was taken not to combine the two measures, since the Government's policy was to use the regulatory reform procedure to make reforms wherever appropriate, whether or not primary legislation was in prospect: the benefit was "to reduce the burden of unnecessary bureaucracy, to do things as quickly as possible . . . consistently with maintaining the necessary protections and of course to reduce pressure on Parliamentary business."[141] He considered that the result of the regulatory reform order process was a "thoroughgoing exercise" which complemented the passage of the Bill and would result in a "comprehensive, well supported Order":[142] "we have managed to combine through the Bill and the Regulatory Reform Order a lot more than we would have achieved by simply doing it through the Bill alone."[143]

230. This is the third proposal for a Regulatory Reform Order we have considered this Session which has had a direct relation to primary legislation going through Parliament.[144] While we reserve judgment on the principle of splitting legislative proposals into bills and regulatory reform orders, we consider that the strategy adopted by the Department in this instance has not created any difficulties for our handling of the proposal.

231. We have also been greatly assisted by the readiness of the Department to co-operate in its swift and full responses to our requests for information. The Department's positive approach to the scrutiny process we have undertaken is welcome. We trust that it will result in a better draft Order.

Guidance to users and business

232. We asked Mr Tony Taig, a risk assessment specialist, whether there were any weak points in the fire safety regime which the proposed Order would establish. He told us that "the obvious one is that at the moment we do not know where the goalposts are."[145]

You cannot leave it to a million premises and their duty holders and however many thousands of fire inspectors that there are to make their own judgments as to what is a suitable level of risk or what is a suitable set of precautions for facing a different risk. You must have guidance on that.

Mr Taig considered that the draft Order required a set of guidance documents to spell out to responsible persons what were the benchmarks which people in different circumstances were expected to be able to meet. The goal-based regime of the proposed Order was similar to that implemented by the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, where the efficient operation of the risk assessment regime relied on "having well laid out codes of practice and guidance that explain to people what is good practice for different circumstances."[146] He did not think that the draft Order should come into force before guidance was put in place.[147]

233. We consider that guidance is essential to the proper implementation of the Order. In the absence of a routine fire safety inspection and the judgment of the inspecting officer, the onus for determining the appropriate level of fire precaution provision will fall on the responsible person. It is vital that the responsible person is able to have access to a clear and authoritative source of advice which will tell him how he ought to implement fire safety provisions in such a way that he is able to safeguard his premises from fire, protect responsible persons from the effects of fire and comply with the requirements of the law.

234. The Department has said that if the draft Order is approved, it intends to issue guidance to the public on its requirements. It envisages the production of eleven separate sets of guidance, each directed at specific types of premises.[148] Each guidance book would cost £12, but would be available for free on the Internet. The Minister told us that the guidance would provide much of what was necessary for individuals and organisations to assist them in implementing the provisions of the draft Order, including an explanation of risk assessment and practical guidance on fire prevention and precautions.[149] He stated that the guidance would be accompanied by information leaflets which would explain the law and publicise the Department's intentions.

235. The Department has sent us an early draft of the first guidance book it is intended to produce, a guide to fire safety in offices and shops. The guide is in two parts: an introduction to fire risk assessments (29 pages, containing 14 checklists), and a further section (45 pages) providing more detailed guidance on risk assessment procedures.

236. We are not in a position to provide a comprehensive appraisal of the draft guidance book produced by the Department. We nevertheless note that it is a sizeable document which is likely to prove quite daunting for a small business trying to implement fire safety measures in, for example, a corner shop. The Minister stated that he intended the book to be appropriately sized, so that individuals were encouraged to read it rather than to put it to one side.[150] In our view the guidance book which we have been shown in draft is of a type which might well daunt a small business unless its staff were provided with a simpler and more accessible guide to the law and to their obligations under it.

237. We were heartened to hear that the Chief Fire Officers' Association was drafting a short four-page guidance document targeted at small businesses which it intended to submit to the Department for its approval.[151] CFOA appeared to consider that small businesses would not need "a 120-page guidance document".[152] We consider that standard entry-level guidance to fire safety responsibilities ought to be made available to complement the detailed guidance books which are being drafted. Such initial guidance should of course be drafted in plain English, and should be user-friendly and accessible.

238. We have already noted that a separate system of guidance is required on the interpretation of some aspects of the proposal. We consider that the necessary protection envisaged in articles 13 and 14 cannot be maintained unless guidance is given to responsible persons on what "where necessary" may mean, and to enforcement authorities as to how they should perform their duties effectively under the Order.[153] This guidance clearly needs to be mainstreamed throughout the guides which the Department proposes to produce.

239. We are surprised that there is no provision in the draft Order for the issue of guidance on its implementation. The only provision for guidance is in article 26, which requires enforcing authorities to have regard to "such guidance as the Secretary of State may give" them. We find it odd that the Department does not propose to make statutory provision requiring the issue of guidance. Such provision would arguably enhance the status of any guidance and would reinforce its importance to the regime which the proposed Order would bring in.

240. We consider that there is merit in making statutory provision for the issue of guidance. A statutory requirement, placing the Secretary of State under a duty to issue appropriate guidance on the interpretation of the proposal's provisions and their application, would underpin the importance of guidance in ensuring the effective and consistent application of fire safety provisions across the range of premises. We recommend that the Department amend the draft Order to place a statutory requirement on the Secretary of State to issue guidance on its implementation and interpretation.


139   Under Standing Order No. 141(5), the Committee may report to the House on any matter arising from its consideration of the proposal. Back

140   The Government's proposals in respect of fire inspection and the introduction of a duty of community fire safety: explanatory statement, para 42. Back

141   Q 85 Back

142   Q 88 Back

143   Q 90 Back

144   The other two instances have been the proposals for the Regulatory Reform (Patents) Order 2004 and the Regulatory Reform (National Health Service Charitable Trust Accounts and Audit) Order 2004, which were related to the Patents Bill [Lords] and the Public Audit (Wales) Bill [Lords] respectively. Back

145   Q 73 Back

146   Q 80 Back

147   Q 81 Back

148   Explanatory statement, para 384 Back

149   Q 120 Back

150   Q 123 Back

151   Q 34 Back

152   The draft guidance book produced by the Department has 114 pages. Back

153   See above, para 77 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 August 2004