Select Committee on Regulatory Reform Eleventh Report


Appendix F

E- mail from John McDonnell MP, Chair, RMT Parliamentary Group, to all Members of the Committee

Proposal for the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2004

I am writing to draw your attention to the concerns of the RMT Parliamentary Group about 'Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2004'.

In particular we are concerned that this order will lead to the ending of the statutory requirement concerning minimum Fire Safety requirements in London Underground and Railway Stations, which would then become a matter of risk assessment for the Secretary of State.

These regulations were introduced in the wake of the Kings Cross disaster for good reason and the RMT Parliamentary Group is concerned that there should be no downgrading of the standards of fire safety on the London Underground, especially when the present danger of a terrorist threat is considered.

I have attached a copy of my letter to the Chair of the Regulatory Reform Committee, for your information.

12 July 2004

Annex

Letter from John McDonnell MP to the Chairman of the Committee

I am writing to you as Chair of the Regulatory Reform Committee to raise with you concerns with regards to the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2004 which I understand is presently under consideration by your committee.

My concerns specifically relate to the fact that if passed in its current form the Order will revoke the Fire Precautions (Sub-Surface Railway Stations) Regulations 1989.

As you will be aware these regulations were introduced as a direct result of the Kings Cross Fire in November 1987 and set out minimum standards of fire precautions that are to apply at sub-surface stations, the special perils of which were recognised by the Board of Trade as far back as 1904 when they specified certain requirements in relation to the construction of the underground railways.

The regulations were brought into force under the powers conferred upon the Secretary of State within Section 12 of the Fire Precautions Act 1971.

The regulations have been applied at 115 London underground stations and require stringent and wide-ranging fire fighting and precautions measures, including means of escape, means of fighting fire, minimum staffing levels and staff instruction/ training, means of detecting /warning of fire and fire resistance.

Your will also be aware these regulations arose from the deficiencies identified by the Fennell Report into the Kings Cross Fire.

The effect of the order will be to remove these minimum safety standards and instead allow management the freedom to risk assess fire safety measures.

It is unclear to me and I am sure London Underground users and employees how such a measure will improve fire safety on the Underground and indeed there are bound to be fears that without minimum standards corners will be cut and safety compromised.

In this respect has the government been able to explain why it is now necessary to move away from the recommendations in the Fennell Report and why the regulations that parliament deemed so essential in 1989 are no longer valid?

I therefore believe that there are strong arguments for ensuring that the Sub-Surface Regulations automatically transfer over as subordinate legislation to Article 24 of the new Regulatory Reform Order and, therefore, retains the current minimum requirements that apply to sub-surface railway stations.

If this is not possible, however, I understand the existing power to make specific regulations under Section 12 of the Fire Precautions Act will be retained within Article 24 of the new Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order and the government should use these powers to immediately to introduce regulations identical to the revoked Fire Precautions (Sub-Surface Railway Stations) Regulations 1989.

I would be happy to discuss this matter with you or your committee if you feel that would be helpful.

12 July 2004


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 August 2004