Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES)

SUMMARY

    —  Retaining good teachers in schools is a high priority for the Government. Having invested time and money in training people to a high standard, we must make the most of their expertise.

    —  Effective recruitment is the starting point. Training bursaries and golden hellos have had a significant effect on numbers with recruitment in secondary training this year up 16% on 1998-99. Increasing numbers has not brought a diminution in quality, and this increasing flow of well-qualified and well-prepared trainees is likely to help retention in the longer run.

    —  FTE regular teacher numbers are up by 4,300 on last year and by 13,700 since January 2001 bringing the total to 423,900. They have reached their highest level since 1982. Regular teacher numbers (excluding supply teachers) are up in both primary and secondary schools. Total teacher vacancies have fallen since last year by 1,140 (-25%). Headteacher, deputy head and classroom teacher vacancies have all fallen. Classroom teacher vacancies are down 27% on last year. The national teacher vacancy rate is 0.9%, the first time it has been below 1% since 2000. Since 2001, total teacher vacancies have fallen by 32%.

    —  Retention also appears to be getting better. Latest data from the University of Liverpool in the 2002 calendar year suggest that wastage rates from teaching have stabilised or are decreasing, after rising since 1998. The major reason teachers give for leaving is workload. Secondary teachers also cite pupil behaviour. Personal factors (wanted change/new challenge, personal circumstances) are also important. The main reasons for staying are helping pupils learn, love of a subject, a sense of vocation and school holidays.

    —  Based on this and other research the Government's retention policies concentrate on reducing teacher workload and bureaucracy, and making more time for professional development and lesson planning; supporting teachers better in managing behaviour and supporting learning and professional development for teachers, especially in the early years in the profession.

    —  These are the three national policy strategies, which apply to all teachers. In addition, we have particular policies aimed at teachers in shortage subjects; teachers in particular parts of the country, notably London; and teachers at particular stages in their careers. And at the forefront of our measures to modernise the profession, to raise standards, to address teachers' concerns, and to improve retention is workforce remodelling.

    —  On 15 January 2003, all national partners, with the exception of the NUT, signed the National Agreement on Workload—"Raising Standards and Tackling Workload: a National Agreement"—which represents a broad, deep and determined coalition for a better deal for teachers and pupils. The benefits to schools and their staff of remodelling will be profound. Schools that have already addressed the issue of teacher workload will be in a stronger position to retain their staff. Not only will teachers experience a reduction in workload, their work will also be focused on teaching and their professional responsibilities.

    —  Improving schools' and teachers' ability to deal with challenging behaviour from pupils is crucial to raising educational standards, as well as improving teacher retention and job satisfaction. The Government is therefore investing nearly £470 million over the next three years in a major programme to achieve that.

    —  Better human resource management is also vital, reinforcing the reasons why teachers enjoy their profession. It is here that our strategies for Continuing Professional Development and improved leadership have a key role to play.

    —  Pay and pensions have been improved. A good honours graduate who started teaching in 1997, for example, will have seen his salary increase by 68% in real terms by April this year and The Teachers' Pension Scheme, as a final salary scheme providing an index-linked range of benefits, is an increasingly attractive retention incentive when compared to pension developments elsewhere. In recent years we have taken action to make the scheme more flexible, so that teachers who wish to reduce their working week while not leaving the profession altogether are not disadvantaged.

—  The effects of retention on pupil achievement are hard to establish. It must be true that schools which are unable to retain high calibre teachers find it harder to achieve high standards for their pupils. Schools which have high proportions of pupils who enter with low attainment or with behaviour problems; schools which have poor and decaying buildings and fabric; and schools whose leadership and management standards are poor are likelier to have difficulties with both standards and retention. But it is certainly not true that this necessarily applies to all schools serving "tough" areas, or with high proportions of children entitled to free school meals. There are plenty of examples of schools which succeed despite these challenges.

    —  Everyone in the education system has a role to play to ensure the current encouraging trend is maintained. The initiatives described in this memorandum—on workload, behaviour, professional development, leadership and so forth—are intended to help schools and those who run them. But they will not work by themselves. Every school, as an employer, and every LEA must take responsibility for the way it manages its employees as much of their job satisfaction depends on the working environment and colleagues that they meet there.

Retention cannot be considered entirely independently from recruitment. The following section and the associated tables are designed to highlight the impact that recent initiatives have had on improving the numbers and the quality of recruits into Initial Teacher Training (ITT).

IMPROVEMENTS IN THE NUMBERS AND QUALITY OF RECRUITS INTO ITT

(The tables referred to in this Section are located in Annex A)

  1.  Teaching is a profession with good job security, comparatively good prospects of advancement, long holidays and, over the last five years, pay rates that have appeared increasingly favourable by comparison with other parts of the public sector. Nevertheless, in times of economic stability, public-sector employers find it hard to compete with the material rewards on offer in the private sector.

  2.  The Government and the Teacher Training Agency have taken measures to help ensure that teacher recruitment over the last three years has been able to buck the economic trend. This has been largely thanks to the introduction of a portfolio of financial incentives. The upturn in recruitment for mathematics and science began in 1999-2000 with the introduction of "old-style" Golden Hello incentives for PGCE trainees in these subjects, consisting of a £2,500 bursary during training and a further £2,500 lump-sum on appointment to a post in a maintained school. From 2000-01, these payments were superseded by a training bursary of £6,000 for all home and European PGCE trainees, followed by a £4,000 "new-style" Golden Hello for those qualifying and completing their induction year in the priority subjects of mathematics, science, modern languages, technology and English.

  3.  The effect of these incentives on recruitment has been dramatic with full-time equivalent regular teacher numbers up to 423,900, their highest level since 1982. Table [1] shows, in the current academic year, 11,057 trainees have been recruited in the five priority subjects, compared with just 8,871 in 1998-99. Overall, recruitment in secondary training this year is 16% higher than it was then. The signs are that this positive trend is continuing. Applications for PGCE courses starting in 2003-04 are running well above last year's level overall and in almost all individual secondary subjects.

  4.  Data on the academic qualifications held by postgraduate secondary trainee teachers by subject as shown in table [2] are available only up to the 2000-01 entry cohort. Data for 2001-02 will be published this summer. While there are some year-on-year fluctuations, the figures suggest that about half of new entrants to PGCE courses consistently hold an Upper Second or better degree, and that the increase in recruitment that followed the introduction of training bursaries from September 2000 did not bring a diminution of the academic credentials of trainees.

  5.  Data on completion and progression among final-year undergraduate and postgraduate secondary trainees as given in table [3] is also available for the 2000-01 cohort and shows that, while the proportion who gained Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) fell slightly over the previous year, the proportion of qualifiers who went straight into teaching jobs rose. The increasing flow of well-qualified, suitable and well-prepared trainees is likely to help retention in the longer run.

  6.  The incremental easing of the recruitment position has allowed the Government gradually to increase the number of training places that it funds, moving away from the concept of an annual recruitment "target" and towards a system that encourages training providers to raise their aspirations in terms of the number of places that they fill. Accordingly, the number of places on secondary training courses in 2003-04, at 19,475, will be 10% higher than it was this year and 17% higher than in 1999-2000.

  7.  As well as seeking to recruit new graduates who are likely to stay, the Government has also sought to widen the range of recruitment markets in which teaching is active. The QTS credits and Teacher Associates Scheme are seeking to give undergraduates a taste of what working in a school is like (and, in the case of the former, academic credit towards a teaching qualification) with a view to encouraging them to choose teacher training when they graduate. The early results of these schemes show that they are having a positive effect on students' perceptions of the teaching profession, and they are set to expand over the next three years. Last year's Spending Review also provided funds for the TTA to develop subject enhancement courses in mathematics, physics, chemistry and modern languages. The Government hopes that these will in due course provide an effective route into teaching for graduates whose subject-knowledge falls just below the degree-equivalence needed for admission to a PGCE.

  8.  The most important of the new markets being exploited is, however, that of mature career-changers. The Graduate Teacher Programme (GTP), created in 1998, has quickly become a major contributor to secondary teacher recruitment. Under this programme, mature graduates are able to work towards QTS while being employed in schools (and paid) as unqualified teachers. Employment-based training options are now also available to those with HND or equivalent qualifications and overseas-trained teachers who wish to develop longer-term careers in this country than would be possible without gaining QTS. In 2001-02, the employment-based routes provided 10% of all secondary trainees, and as many as 17% in the five priority subjects. The Government announced on 13 December 2002 that the number of employment-based training places on offer would double by 2005-06. Over 90% of entrants to employment-based training go on to gain QTS and take up jobs in the maintained school sector.

  9.  It is clearly desirable to ensure that as many new teachers as possible be encouraged to make use of their training. In determining whether or not newly-qualified teachers actually take up their first teaching post and then stay, experience of school life gained while in training and the availability of a suitable post in a convenient location are clearly important. The Government has also introduced a number of additional, targeted financial incentives to encourage more teachers to go directly into and then stay in the profession. Golden Hellos have, in their various forms, been available since 1999-2000. These were supplemented last September by a scheme to pay off, over time, the student loan debts of new teachers of the five priority subjects if they enter and remain in teaching posts in the maintained sector.

  10.  Newly-qualified teachers are the main, but not the only, component of the supply of secondary teachers with QTS. Returners to the profession and teachers who move into the maintained sector from other types of service (for example, in an independent school) also make a major contribution to replenishing the teaching force. Table [4] shows the numbers of entrants and leavers to the maintained secondary schools sector over time. They show that in only three years out of ten from 1988-89 were there more entrants to than leavers from teaching, but that numbers of entrants exceeded number of leavers in the three years to 2000-01, on the most recent data available.

  11.  The extent to which the secondary teaching force has grown since 1997 is shown by table [5]. There are now almost 18,000 more full-time equivalent teachers in secondary schools than there were in 1997. Although some of this increase is due to changes in the Teachers' Pensions Scheme, larger numbers of overseas-trained teachers, employment-based trainees and instructors without QTS, there has also been a rapid increase in the number of staff with QTS who are, it might be presumed, more likely to stay. Growing numbers of qualified teachers working part-time suggest that employment practices are becoming more family-friendly, and that this may be allowing teachers who have taken a break from the profession for family reasons to return sooner than might have been the case a few years ago.

  12.  Despite larger numbers of teachers, it appears from table [6] that there is no clear relationship between trends in numbers of secondary teachers and the number of secondary classroom teacher vacancies. This may be due partly to the increases in school funding that took place over this period having allowed headteachers to aspire to a staffing complement closer to their ideal than was possible in less generous times. Geographical factors may also have played a part in local teacher availability. Of the 2,050 secondary teacher vacancies (1,940 classroom teacher vacancies) recorded in January 2003, over a quarter were in London schools.

  13.  Although steadily growing teacher numbers are welcome in themselves (Annex B provides further statistical information), the constraints on the supply of new teachers already described and the fact that teacher superannuation will peak over the next few years mean that this trend is unlikely to continue indefinitely. This was recognised by the former Secretary of State in her speech to the Social Market Foundation in November 2001, which heralded a new approach to teacher supply. The Government aims to continue to focus on bringing teachers into the classroom, but with the aim of using them better, supporting them more effectively and retaining them longer once they are there. The remodelling agenda is covered below.

TEACHERS LEAVING THE PROFESSION—SOME EVIDENCE

  14.  The most recent research on factors affecting teachers' decisions to leave the profession is by Smithers and Robinson at the University of Liverpool, a project commissioned by the DfES. The study involved surveys of schools and teachers across the three termly resignation dates in 2002.

  15.  The research found that, in 2002, 14.8% of teachers in primary schools and 12.8% in secondary schools resigned from their posts, but most of these teachers were moving onto full-time jobs in other maintained schools (33.4% primary and 38.8% secondary). A significant minority were moving to supply teaching (10.9% from primary and 3.6% from secondary). Other destinations included:

    —  13% were retiring (12.1% from primary 13.5% from secondary);

    —  9% leaving for maternity/family care (12% from primary and 5.7% from secondary);

    —  7% were taking other teaching posts, for example in the independent sector and FE (6.3% from primary and 8.6% from secondary);

    —  5% to "other employment" (3.8% from primary and 5.9% from secondary);

    —  4% to other education jobs eg LEA advisers (3.8% primary and 4.5% secondary); and

    —  4% to travel (3.4% primary and 4% secondary).

  16.  Secondary schools have lower turnover (ie loss from a particular school) and wastage (ie loss from the profession) than primary schools. The survey findings identified turnover rates of 15.3% for primary and 13.1% for secondary; and wastage rates of 9.3% for primary and 7.3% for secondary.

  17.  Those leaving tended to be either very young teachers with a few years' service or older teachers approaching retirement, to be female, and to teach in shortage subjects. This was similar across both primary and secondary.

  18.  Smithers and Robinson suggest that the rise in teacher loss of the last few years seems to have improved when looking at DfES and Employer Organisation comparable figures.

Reasons for leaving the profession:

  19.  For an individual school, it makes little difference whether a teacher is leaving to take another post in a different school or leaving the profession completely. For the Department, our attention is naturally more focused on keeping teachers in the profession.

  20.  Liverpool University asked those leaving the profession for their reasons. The main ones rated as "of great importance" by secondary teachers were: workload (39%); wanting a change (38%); Govt initiatives (35%); stress (34%) and poor pupil behaviour (34%). The picture for primary schools was very similar, except that pupil behaviour ranked much lower.

  21.  These findings echo those of other research and polls, including the large-scale survey by the GTC in late 2002. This survey with 70,000 respondents, asked why teachers go into teaching, and stay there. The main reasons are because they like working with children (54%) and they think it is a creative, varied, challenging job (33%). These factors continue to motivate them during their career—working with children (cited by 48%), the job satisfaction of teaching (32%) and the creativity and stimulation that it brings (25%). There are also many teachers (approximately 15% for each) who value their school community/collegiality, their subject, family friendly hours, the long holidays or simply think it is too late to do anything else.

  22.  When asked how they think the profession should develop—the largest single request was for "appropriate support to be able to concentrate on teaching and learning" (59%). 56% of teachers say they want "ring fenced time for professional development". 44% want to be free to adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of individual pupils and 36% want to be "free to use autonomous and creative learning and teaching approaches".

  23.  Based on this research (and, rather more so, the previous studies with similar findings), the Government's secondary retention policies concentrate on:

    —  Reducing teacher workload and bureaucracy, and making more time for professional development and lesson planning.

    —  Supporting teachers better in managing behaviour.

    —  Supporting learning and professional development for teachers, especially in the early years in the profession.

  These are the three national policy strategies, which apply to all teachers. In addition, we have particular policies aimed at teachers in shortage subjects; teachers in particular parts of the country, notably London; and teachers at particular stages in their careers. And at the forefront of our measures to modernise the profession, to raise standards, to address teachers' concerns, and to improve retention is workforce remodelling.

WORKLOAD AND BUREAUCRACY—WORKFORCE REMODELLING

  24.  Our strategy on school workforce remodelling has been developed over many months, and in close consultation with national partners with an interest in our schools. It brings together the need to reduce teacher workload with the need to continue to raise standards in secondary schools. We recognise, above all, that a tired teacher is not an effective teacher. And a teacher must be allowed to focus on what is most important—teaching and learning.

  25.  The PricewaterhouseCoopers report on teacher workload, commissioned by Government and published in December 2001, found that teachers were spending 20% of their time on administrative and supervisory tasks that could be done by others. The subsequent School Teachers' Review Body report, building on the PwC work, made plain that teacher workload needed to be tackled. Teacher hours in term-time were on average 52 hours per week, and in some cases higher. The STRB made a series of proposals for reducing excessive workload, including thorough changes to the teachers' contract. In responding to these proposals, the Government entered into detailed discussions with all national partners with the aim of reaching an agreement on the nature and implementation of reforms that would turn the tide on teacher workload.

  26.  In October 2002 the Government published "Time for Standards"—a vision of the future whereby lessons are delivered more flexibly, supported by a wider range of adults and ICT, so that teachers have more "time to teach" and headteachers are committed to leading change in their schools.

  27.  On 15 January 2003, all national partners, with the exception of the NUT, signed the National Agreement on Workload—"Raising Standards and Tackling Workload: a National Agreement"—which represents a broad, deep and determined coalition for a better deal for teachers and pupils. It set out particular milestones for implementing the agreement in schools:

    —  Phase one—2003

    —  Routine delegation of 24 non-teaching tasks

    —  Begin to promote reductions in overall excessive hours

    —  Introduce new work/life balance clause

    —  Establish new Implementation Review Unit

    —  Undertake review of use of school closure days

    —  Leadership Time

    —  Phase two—2004

    —  Introduce new limits on covering for absent teachers

    —  Phase three—2005 (at latest)

    —  Guaranteed professional time for planning, preparation and assessment

  28.  Progress on delivery of the proposals in the National Agreement is being monitored through the establishment of the Workforce Agreement Monitoring Group—a group for Signatories to the Agreement, but involving other partners as necessary. It will promote the Agreement, help to finalise the new contractual and legal framework and initiate change on the ground.

  29.  On 7 April 2003 a consultation package developed in partnership with WAMG was published. It contains details of proposed changes to teachers' contracts, regulations on the role of support staff in teaching and learning and a set of standards for Higher Level Teaching Assistants. The consultation represents the first concrete step in implementing the National Agreement.

  30.  A National Remodelling Team has been established as part of the National College for School Leadership. Under the leadership of Dame Patricia Collarbone; the team will work closely with WAMG, LEAs and other partners to help schools to remodel. The Team will establish a network of support that will provide practical guidance on remodelling for the nation's schools. The NRT will also support school leaders in managing change within their schools, building on the success of the Transforming School Workforce Pathfinder project (see case study).

  31.  The NRT will draw on the expertise and knowledge of LEAs to ensure school successfully remodel. A network of LEA facilitators will work closely with the team and help schools to deliver the national agreement.

  32.  Over the next three years there will be significant extra money coming into the system, with £2.6 billion this year, and more in the next two years. There have been well-reviewed and debatable issues around school funding this year. But remodelling has always been about the total amount of resources available to a school. Schools will need to look carefully at how they use existing resources as well as new funding to meet the contractual requirements outlined in the Agreement and to successfully remodel. They need to think in new ways about how they can best utilise the range of skills within their workforce, both existing and new. And how they deploy them to allow a sharper focus on teaching and learning.

Effects of Remodelling on Retention

  33.  The benefits to schools and their staff of successfully remodelling will be numerous. Schools that have already addressed the issue of teacher workload will be in a stronger position to retain their staff. Not only will teachers experience a reduction in workload, their work will also be focused on teaching and their professional responsibilities. Evidence from the Transforming School Workforce Pathfinder project has clearly highlighted the benefits a remodelled workforce can have. A snapshot shot survey of the 32 heads involved in the project, taken just 6 months into the year long project, produced the following results:

    —  29 heads said that their teachers' workload had reduced or been redistributed either significantly or to a large extent.

    —  Half said their workforce were now experiencing a better work/life balance.

    —  All reported benefits on teacher morale and well being with just over a third saying these were significant.

  (Case studies provided as Annex C outline some of the plans implemented by Cirencester Deer Park school in Gloucestershire and the benefits that they have experienced).

Tackling Bureaucracy

  34.  The Implementation Review Unit (IRU) is another key component of implementing the national workforce agreement. A panel of 12 experienced practitioners (nine heads, two senior teachers and one bursar) will review existing and new policy initiatives by the Government and other relevant organisations such as QCA and LSC. It will tackle unnecessary paper work, assess workload implications and reduce bureaucratic processes. We expect the IRU—which will publish an annual report on its work—also to be vigorous and challenging to the Department in the cause of reducing burdens on schools and maximising the coherence and effective communication of DfES strategies and policies.

BEHAVIOUR

  35.  Improving schools' and teachers' ability to deal with challenging behaviour from pupils is crucial to raising educational standards, as well as improving teacher retention and job satisfaction. The Government is therefore investing nearly £470 million over the next three years in a major programme to achieve that. The programme has two main elements:

    —  a universal element, providing every secondary school with review, training and consultancy support; and

    —  a targeted element providing intensive support for schools facing the greatest challenges.

  36.  The universal element is a new behaviour and attendance strand of the Key Stage 3 Strategy. From September 2003 it will provide every secondary school with materials enabling them to review how they improve and manage behaviour and to identify staff training needs. It will also provide training materials to meet those needs. Every LEA will have expert behaviour and attendance consultants to help schools carry out reviews and deliver subsequent training. All this will enable schools to improve their systems and give staff greater confidence in managing behaviour.

  37.  The targeted element will extend Behaviour Improvement Projects (BIPs) beyond the 34 local education authorities (LEAs) in which they have been operating since September 2002. BIPs provide intensive support for selected secondary schools and linked primary schools. They are packages of behaviour support measures tailored to local needs, but typically include multi-agency Behaviour and Education Support Teams (BESTs) to work with pupils with the most serious problems, Learning Mentors and in-school Learning Support Units beyond those already provided by the Excellence in Cities (EiC) programme and police officers based in schools.

  38.  BIPs are now part of the behaviour and attendance strand of the EiC programme. They will be extended to 27 more LEAs by September 2003, which means BIPs in all EiC LEAs supporting over 200 secondary schools, and to all Excellence Clusters by September 2005.

  39.  The BIPs operating in pathfinder LEAs are already starting to show results. London University's ongoing evaluation shows fewer exclusions from targeted schools and that teachers welcome support from multi-agency BESTs, additional Learning Mentors, police in schools and senior staff appointed to take responsibility for whole-school behaviour management issues.

CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (CPD), FEEDBACK, PROGRESSION AND LEADERSHIP

  40.  Workload, bureaucracy and behaviour are reasons why teachers leave teaching, and we are seeking to reduce them. But it is equally important to reinforce the reasons why teachers enjoy their profession, and want to continue in it. It is here that Continuing Professional Development (CPD) has a key role to play. According to the GTC survey, most teachers are looking for "appropriate support to be able to concentrate on teaching and learning", and time for professional development.

  41.  Our current strategy, launched two years ago in March 2001, aims to create better opportunities for relevant, focused and effective professional development leading to improved skills, knowledge, understanding and effectiveness in schools. There is a range of centrally-funded work-related training and development programmes and initiatives available to teachers. In particular these create opportunities to share effective practice and to learn from other schools, and encourage Heads to develop their schools as professional learning communities.

  42.  We are proposing to extend the Early Professional Development (EPD) Programme nationally from September 2004. This is intended to support teachers better during the critical first five years of their teaching careers. Interim evaluation of the EPD Pilot by the National Foundation for Educational Research has shown that the pilot has had a positive impact on the morale of those involved and, consequently, their commitment to teaching.

  43.  In addition, the Centre for British Teachers (CfBT) has been commissioned to design and create an on-line tool for teachers in their first five years in the profession, which will enable them to be more strategic when planning their career progression and professional development. The project will provide a comprehensive digest of possible career paths in teaching and a map of professional development and employment opportunities. These materials will be launched in September 2004 to accompany the introduction of the national scheme of early professional development for teachers.

  44.  All this will, we believe, be welcome to teachers. However, we also know that offering training and development opportunities by themselves are not enough; they need to be linked closely to an individual's needs. That will sometimes mean their personal needs; sometimes the needs of their job. Teachers, like any other employees, need suggestions and feedback from managers and colleagues, to help them identify their needs.

  45.  This is why effective and satisfying CPD needs to run alongside an effective performance management system in each school. Performance management, when done well, will raise a teacher's sense of satisfaction and commitment. It provides a focus for professional development, and links together the needs of the individual and the school where they are working. However, Ofsted has found that only 1 in 6 schools have an embedded system and too often teachers view it with suspicion.

  46.  We are therefore taking action to improve teachers' and headteachers' annual appraisals; to issue plainer guidance on capability procedures; to streamline the threshold assessment process for experienced teachers passing the "pay threshold" relying more on school judgements; to open the debate around performance-related pay; and to improve the link between performance management and professional development.

  47.  The aim is for more schools to start seeing performance management as part of a toolkit to support school and teacher improvement. This should directly affect staff retention.

Progression

  48.  For the experienced and competent teacher, fresh challenges help them to stay committed and enthusiastic. In introducing the Advanced Skills Teacher grade (AST) the Government provided an opportunity for excellent teachers to gain recognition through enhanced pay and status whilst remaining primarily in front-line teaching. ASTs have the stimulation of extending their own experience and skills, because they spend a day a week on outreach work with their colleagues in their own or other schools. As one head put it,

  "The particularly good thing about the AST scheme is that it is a very good device for recruiting or retaining someone that you know is a good teacher. From the school's perspective, we get a teacher who can act as a best practice role model that others can observe and learn from on a much longer term basis than any other existing methods. But it is also good for the teacher's own career progression as not everyone wants to go into management, in which case becoming an AST is the only way to go."

Leadership

  49.  Retaining school leaders is an important aspect of overall secondary school retention. Headship is a demanding job, and heads rightly feel that they carry important responsibilities. But it is crucial that heads do not feel expected to carry sole responsibility for all aspects of their school's activities, because such a load, in a large secondary school, is not sustainable long term. That is why the concept of distributed leadership is so important.

  50.  Distributed leadership builds capacity within the school and across the school system. It is about developing leadership and harnessing energy at many levels, adapting structures, systems and cultures. It releases and extends leadership capacity now and develops it for the future. In this model, even NQTs can take some leadership responsibility within their schools from the beginning of their career, maximising their opportunities to develop the skills that will make them outstanding school leaders in the future. And it gives a head the support they need to run a large and complex organisation.

  51.  Distributed leadership is a key concept in the reform and retention agenda. The next phase of reform needs to be driven by schools which are individually strong and effective and which come together in powerful and innovative collaborative groups. Schools cannot be consistently strong, nor can we get sustained powerful networking without enthusiastic leadership at every level within the school.

  52.  School leaders, like other teachers, need refreshment and challenge at different stages in their careers. The advice of the National College for School Leadership (NCSL) have proposed a Leadership Development Framework, built around five stages of school leadership;

    —  emergent leadership (when a teacher begins to take on leadership responsibilities);

    —  established leadership (heads of departments and deputy heads);

    —  entry to headship (including preparation and induction for headship);

    —  advanced leadership (maturing leaders widening their experience); and

    —  consultant leadership (able and experienced leaders taking on training, inspection, mentoring and other responsibilities).

  53.  This framework offers teachers and heads different supportive routes for career progression, with training and support programmes on offer at each stage. This ought, in the medium term, to assist retention.

TARGETED MEASURES

  54.  The three key national strategies, which will affect all secondary and many primary teachers, have been considered above. There are also particular subjects and parts of the country where the evidence shows that teacher retention can be difficult, and stages in a teacher's career when they are likelier to leave.

Shortage subjects

  55.  Golden hellos and the repayment of teachers' loans (RTL) were referred to in the section on ITT. RTL in particular is new, and is an experiment. The scheme has been running for only eight months, but so far over 5,000 teachers have applied to join it. By the end of the pilot we expect around 20,000 teachers to be in the scheme. It is naturally much too early to assess whether the scheme is aiding retention, but recent research among trainee teachers showed that 34% of them thought that having their loan repaid was likely to encourage them to remain in teaching.

  56.  We are also trying to help teachers retain the enthusiasm for their subject which, for many, is the reason they entered teaching in the first place. We issued a consultative document, "Subject Specialism" in March, and we will be meeting our external partners, including Ofsted, QCA, and key partners from the subject areas to discuss this. We will be looking at mechanisms, in our consultation meetings, of strengthening the role of subject associations in providing or recommending CPD programmes, teaching materials, and general support for teachers in their subject area. The school workforce agenda set out in "Time for Standards" makes it clear that support staff also need similar access to subject support.

Parts of the country

  57.  The vacancy data, and anecdotal evidence, confirm that teacher retention is harder in some parts of the country than others. The statistics show vacancy and turnover levels at their highest in London, especially Inner London, followed by the South East and Eastern regions. There is a high correlation with areas of high house prices and general high cost of living.

  58.  This is recognised through the pay system, on the recommendations of the independent School Teachers' Review Body (STRB). This year will see new, higher pay scales for all categories of teachers in Inner London. These merge the national scales with London allowances. STRB will be examining outer London and fringe considerations as part of their longer term examination of local approaches to pay, with the report on this due in January 2004. Given that the standard of living experienced on a teacher's wage and the recruitment and retention situation varies from one part of the country to another, we think there may be scope for more thinking here. Our evidence to the STRB asked them to consider as a long term issue how we can move to a position where we better reflect local differences in costs and rest more responsibility in the hands of Heads.

  59.  Affordable housing is a clear concern for teachers living and working in and around London and the South East. We continue to work closely alongside the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM), who have responsibility for housing policy. The Starter Homes Initiative has delivered £250 million of funding helping to support 3,500 teachers in London and the South East to buy homes in areas of high cost and demand. This has been followed closely by a £300 million Challenge Fund, which will build affordable homes for people, including teachers, in London, the South East and Eastern Regions to rent and buy.

  60.  The concentration of issues that affect London, including the particular retention pressures, justify a tailor made programme of work for the capital. The recently published document "The London Challenge: Transforming London Secondary Schools" sets out our strategy for creating a world-class system of secondary education in London. The wide-ranging programme of work will be led by the first Commissioner for London Schools, Tim Brighouse.

  61.  A crucial part of the London Challenge is to make London a place where, as in many other professions, teachers feel they should come if they want to be at the peak of their profession. At present, while it remains possible to attract large numbers of teachers to the capital at the start of their working lives, significant numbers of them do not make their careers there. The impact of this differs between schools, but crucial for London as a whole is the reduced pool of potential middle managers and leaders of the future. Around a third of all London teachers have less than six years experience, and the age profile of London teachers shows a significant drop in numbers in their late 20s and 30s—crucial years for developing middle management.

  62.  Evidence suggests that a variety of factors contribute to this. Crucial are the high costs of living and particularly the costs of housing. Increases to teachers' pay (an inner London teacher with no management responsibility could receive no more than £23,379 in 1997—now, inner London teachers moving to point 2 of the upper pay spine will receive £35,673) and the Starter Homes Initiative are beginning to have an impact on these. In tackling the issue of the weakened pool of middle leaders, we are working with the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister on a targeted scheme to enable those with the potential to be leaders of the future in London to afford family homes.

  63.  Equally important is to create in London an education service which acts as a magnet for teachers. There is no doubt that there are considerable pressures on teachers in challenging London schools. The London Challenge seeks to strengthen the system London-wide, addressing challenges of behaviour, strengthening leadership development and embarking on the biggest programme of school building and refurbishment for very many years. These components of the strategy will all have a positive impact on teaching in London.

  64.  Equally, we want London to be a place where teachers are keen to come to develop their careers. We are developing a new status—"Chartered London Teacher"—to reward those who complete a programme of professional development and achieve excellence in the classroom. And through the National College of School Leadership and the London Leadership Centre, we are providing opportunities for London teachers at all levels to develop as leaders. A new cadre of London Commissioner's teachers, advanced skills teachers recruited and rewarded for working in the most challenging schools, will act as leaders of the London system.

Stages in a teaching career

  65.  It is a truism that new graduates, at the start of their careers, are the likeliest to switch jobs. For many, the idea of a lifetime career seems positively unappealing, beside the freedom to move between different opportunities—including periods of travel or study. It is therefore not surprising that teachers are the likeliest to leave the profession in the first five years of employment. We have already described how programmes of continuing professional development aim to give particular support to teachers during their early years.

  66.  In a working world where flexibility and job changing have become the norm, it is also important to enable teachers to find working patterns that they want, and to switch easily from full time to part time work. There are a number of examples of positive and proactive work being undertaken in this area. The Norfolk Staff Well Being Project was set up to help address some of the work-related health issues causing concern for its teaching and non-teaching staff and has proved a great success.

  (Further details of the Norfolk Well Being Project are included as Annex D)

  67.  Pay is obviously a critical retention factor at all stages in a teacher's career. Teachers have received above-inflation annual rises every year since 1997. A good honours graduate who started teaching in 1997, for example, will have seen his salary increase by 68% in real terms by April this year. We believe that this is a good deal for retaining teachers and successfully balances fairness with affordability, and that the salary structures now in place provide for a well-motivated and well-rewarded profession.

  68.  Until August 2002, teachers usually reached the top of the main classroom teachers' scale (point 9) after 7 or 8 years of experience. From September 2002, the scale was shortened to six points. Teachers who perform well now have additional opportunities to earn significant pay rises that were not previously available to them.

  69.  Excellent teachers are now able to double jump on the main scale, providing additional financial rewards to young high-performing teachers. More importantly good experienced teachers have, since September 2000, been able to apply to "cross the threshold" and access a higher pay scale, if they can demonstrate their capabilities against national standards. We expect head teachers to make recommendations on which teachers should progress through the upper pay scale. They will base these decisions on the individual teacher's overall performance as part of the school's performance management system.

  70.  Schools may also award additional flat-rate allowances to teachers for recruitment and retention purposes which strengthen schools ability to target additional funds in recruiting, retaining and rewarding excellent teachers.

  71.  For teachers approaching the end of their careers, pension entitlements become more important. The Teachers' Pension Scheme, as a final salary scheme providing an index-linked range of benefits, is an increasingly attractive incentive when compared to pension developments elsewhere. In recent years we have taken action to make the scheme more flexible, so that teachers who wish to reduce their working week while not leaving the profession altogether are not disadvantaged. In addition, pensions may be protected in circumstances where it is necessary for headteachers, deputy headteachers and teachers in posts of responsibility to relinquish responsibility where that results in a reduction of contributable salary. It is also possible for teachers, after retirement, to work roughly half a normal working week without affecting their pensions.

  72.  The Green Paper: Simplicity, security and choice: Working and saving for retirement and Inland Revenue proposals on simplification of the tax regime within which pension schemes operate, offer further opportunities for flexibility. There may be more options for scheme members to draw pension whilst continuing or returning to teaching in a lower paid capacity. It is, however, too early to say what form any such changes might take.

EFFECT ON PUPIL ACHIEVEMENTS: CHALLENGED SCHOOLS

  73.  Schools which are unable to retain high calibre teachers find it harder to achieve high standards for their pupils. Ofsted have commented in recent annual reports on the difficulties faced by schools in areas of high turnover. They observed in their latest report that secondary headteachers in such areas seemed increasingly to see the school timetable as a short-term programme with substantial revisions necessary term by term. They also noted that frequent changes of staff, associated with the use of temporary teachers, can militate against the establishment of good pupil teacher relationships.

  74.  On the other hand, it is hard to establish clear cause and effect. It would be equally true to say that schools with low standards, or poor pupil/teacher relationships, or a highly unstable timetable, find it harder to recruit and retain high quality staff. Schools which have high proportions of pupils who enter with low attainment or with behaviour problems; schools which have poor and decaying buildings and fabric; and schools whose leadership and management standards are poor are likelier to have difficulties with both standards and retention. But it is certainly not true that this necessarily applies to all schools serving "tough" areas, or with high proportions of children entitled to free school meals. There are plenty of examples of schools which succeed despite these challenges.

  75.  Our approach has been, as described in this note: first to ensure a high quality of initial teacher training throughout the country; second, to provide incentives for more people to enter teaching, and to remain there, especially in shortage subjects; and third, to give particular support to schools where standards are low (and where the Government's reforms go well beyond the scope of this note).

  76.  On the latter, there is in particular a well developed programme of intervention for schools which enter special measures or serious weaknesses, which has proved itself over time. The intervention looks at the whole school, rather than a single aspect of it, such as retention, and recognises that piecemeal, uncoordinated change will not produce fundamental improvements in standards. It is worth referring briefly to one or two other broader policies which may have a significant effect on retention.

Excellence in Cities

  77.  Excellence in Cities is a targeted programme of extra resources for schools facing the particular challenges of the city. The EiC programme was developed to transform these schools and provides Learning Mentors, Learning Support Units, extended opportunities for Gifted and Talented pupils and City Learning Centres as well as more Beacon and Specialist Schools, Excellence in Cities Action Zones and opportunities for more pupils to set their sights at Higher Education through Aim Higher (previously called Excellence Challenge).

  78.  EiC has made a step-change in the aspirations and achievements of many city schools. It has also undoubtedly played a part to play in retaining teachers who might otherwise leave the profession—driven out by falling standards and disruption in classrooms. In EiC schools results are continuing to improve at a faster rate than in schools elsewhere; as are standards in behaviour and attendance and a better learning environment is being created in classrooms for pupils and teachers alike.

  79.  The latest Ofsted report, Excellence in Cities and Education Action Zones: Management and Impact, found that;

    "the programmes have helped schools and teachers to meet the needs of disaffected and vulnerable pupils more effectively. The report also found that exclusions are being reduced and attendance is improving at a faster rate in the schools involved in the programme."

  80.  As the EiC programme has become more fully embedded the successes have been more pronounced: The Publication of the most recent GCSE and Key Stage 3 results has shown that, for the first time, the achievement gap between schools in EiC areas (where entrenched socio-economic disadvantage has created major obstacles to teaching and learning) and those outside the programme is beginning to close. And as such creating an environment that will help to retain teachers where we may have previously lost them.

  (Further details on achievements and successes in EiC are provided as Annex E)

The Leadership Incentive Grant

  81.  The Leadership Incentive Grant (LIG) provides groups of schools—called Leadership Collaboratives—with the opportunity and the funding to work together to:

    —  accelerate the improvement in standards;

    —  strengthen leadership at all levels; and

    —  build leadership capacity and strengthen teaching and learning through effective collaborative working.

  82.  The Grant is allocated to all mainstream secondary schools with over 35% of students eligible for free school meals in January 2002, or with under 30% of students achieving five GCSEs A*-C (or equivalent) in 2002 or 2001, or in Excellence in Cities (EiC) areas, Education Action Zones (EAZs) or Excellence Clusters (including Clusters due to start in Sept 2003). Each school will receive £125,000 LIG funding per year, from April 2003 to March 2006. A supplement to LIG of £50,000 for each year of the grant will be paid to LIG-eligible schools outside EiC or EAZs to allow them to develop collaborative working arrangements.

  83.  The unrelenting focus on teaching and learning at the heart of LIG is intended to emphasise the importance of the pupil and teacher as the keys to achieving improved standards. The emphasis on working collaboratively will have a positive impact on issues of teacher recruitment and retention, as collaboratives will be working together to:

    —  tackle the workforce remodelling agenda collaboratively;

    —  provide greater opportunities for career development in a mix of schools;

    —  identify and tackle shared priorities (eg behaviour, attendance, low prior attainment);

    —  use ASTs across collaborative schools;

    —  strengthen the training and CPD offer for all staff (eg teachers at middle management);

    —  develop a shared and powerful understanding of how to use VA data to look at a wider picture of achievement;

    —  speed up the improvement in standards and support the schools causing concern as they make progress towards meeting and exceeding the floor targets; and

    —  developing a shared sense of interdependent accountability for ensuring that all pupils have access to real educational opportunities.

CONCLUSION

  84.  This memorandum has necessarily concentrated on the Government's policies and initiatives to improve retention. But underlying all of this is the fact that teachers work in schools, and that much of their job satisfaction depends on the working environment and colleagues that they meet there. For every school that finds it hard to recruit and retain teachers, there is another, in apparently very similar circumstances, that succeeds in doing so. The differences are usually to be found in the calibre and style of the school's leadership; the sense of purpose and collegiality that they foster; their commitment to developing and involving their staff. The initiatives described in this memorandum—on workload, behaviour, professional development, leadership and so forth—are intended to help schools and those who run them. But they will not work by themselves. Every school, as an employer, must take its own responsibilities for the way it manages its employees.

  85.  That said, the overall picture on retention is encouraging. We are confident that we know the principal reasons why those teachers who leave the profession are doing so, and we are confident that we have the right policy initiatives in place to reduce that to a healthy level. There are clearly big challenges that remain for particular schools and for certain areas of the country, and teaching is perhaps inevitably no longer viewed as a job for life by all those who enter the profession. However, there are very exciting prospects in teaching at present and our data suggests that the whole school system is moving in the right direction.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 21 September 2004