Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX

SUTTON TRUST SURVEY OF SECONDARY SCHOOL ADMISSIONS PROCEDURES

THE RESEARCH

  In 2001, the Sutton Trust conducted a study of secondary school admissions procedures. The research analysed DfES reports and data, supplemented by a study of schools' and LEAs' admissions booklets and a survey of 56 LEA's. This is a summary of the main findings.

INTRODUCTION

  The LEA is the admissions authority for 70% of schools. For the other 30% of self-governing but LEA maintained schools the school's governing body is the admissions authority. In total, there are 1,208 separate admissions authorities, each of which can have its own admissions policies.

  Central government has a dual role. Its admissions policies specify whether a school can select by ability or on faith grounds, and it now maintains a list of such schools. At the time of our survey (2001), there were 724 such schools[1], teaching 18% of 14 year olds. The remaining 2,772 secondary schools are not selective by ability or faith, although any school's admissions authority can declare a specialism and admit up to 10% by aptitude for a particular subject.

  Most secondary schools have one admissions policy for their entire intake, but about 10% have a different policy for the minority of their intake. This includes schools partially selecting by aptitude, Church schools which reserve a percentage of places for non-members, and sometimes comprehensives which due to historical reasons select a minority of students.

  Central government's second role is to design and enforce the regulatory framework for schools' admissions policies, procedures and oversubscription criteria. The main element is the Code of Practice, which all LEA maintained admissions authorities (but not CTCs) have to operate.

THE COMPLEX NATURE OF ADMISSIONS

  The phrase "admissions criteria" usually refers to oversubscription criteria. Within the Code of Practice and the law, each admissions authority can select their own oversubscription criteria. A survey of 56 LEAs for the Sutton Trust suggests that 18 different criteria are used, which can be grouped into seven main categories[2]:


Main categories CriteriaExamples

Priority Groups1Catchment area School named on the SEN statement
2Partner primary Attend feeder/linked/partner school, may be automatic or priority entry
Distance3Home to school Straight line, safe/lit/paved route, public transport
4Home to alternative school Straight line, safe/lit/paved route, public transport
Family connection5Sibling at school At application or entry-may include or exclude 6th form
6Past relation Recent or at any time-may include parent, aunt/uncle, grandparent
7Parent employee Parent employed by/governor of school
Religious Belief8The faith Commitment (baptism/attendance) letter from a priest
9Related faiths Commitment to a related faith
10Other/no faith Recognised other faith or acceptance of main faith's ethos
Testing11Ability Score on entry test/s
12Banding Score on entry test/s
13Aptitude Demonstrated aptitude for a subject
Personal request14Single sex Request (with reasons) for single sex
15Religious Education Request (with reasons) for religious education
16First preference Given to 2nd choice by LEA if allocated nearest school is full
Special need17SEN statement School named on the SEN statement
18Supported need Medical, social or educational need (with supporting letter from appropriate professional)

TYPICAL PROCEDURES

  In the autumn preceding a child's move to secondary school, parents receive the new LEA secondary admissions booklet, and visit schools. Application forms are completed and submitted to the admissions authorities in December, which administer preferences and oversubscription criteria in the next two months. In March and April acceptances of first and other preferences are made, and appeals may be lodged.

  LEAs operate two main kinds of preference system for community and voluntary-controlled schools. Around 80% of LEAs allow multiple preferences, usually ranked, but sometimes of equal preference. The remainder have a single preference system, sometimes with a suggested school filled in.

  Arrangements also vary between LEAs as to how many forms parents need to fill in and how the forms are processed. Only two-thirds of LEAs have synchronised the dates for applications, offers and acceptances across all their schools.

  On average, parents apply to 1.9 schools (1.8 outside London, 2.4 in London), with almost half of parents outside London only applying to one school. 20% of London parents apply to four or more schools.

ACCOUNTABILITY

  In 1999, there were significant changes to the procedures, publication and regulation of admissions arrangements, which mark a watershed from earlier practices. Firstly, there is a new code of practice on admissions. Secondly, every admissions authority for a state funded school must now publish its admissions arrangements, especially its oversubscription criteria and the degree of oversubscription by school. The LEA is responsible for publishing an admissions booklet in autumn each year for parents which should contain the admissions arrangements for every school within the authority, including those which are self-governing.

  Thirdly, the proposed admissions arrangements for every LEA maintained school must be circulated beforehand each year to other admissions authorities in the area, and be discussed in the new Schools Admissions Forum. If the forum cannot resolve a problem, then any admissions authority can raise an objection with the Office of the School Adjudicator (this power does not extend to parents, except where schools select wholly or partially by aptitude or ability).

  The fourth new accountability mechanism is the Office of the Schools Adjudicator (OSA), which applies the code of practice. When a Schools Adjudicator investigates an objection, their decision is final, unless subject to judicial review for process. One of the ways of measuring dissatisfaction with the admissions procedures is to look at the number of decisions made by the OSA. In 1999-2000, the first year of operation, there were 68 decisions, but there were fewer than twenty in each of 2000-01 and 2001-02.

SELECTION

  There are three types of selective admissions policy:

    (a)  Grammar schools-wholly selective by academic ability;

    (b)  Partial selection by ability; and

    (c)  Partial selection by aptitude.

  There are 164 grammar schools in England, accounting for 4.7% of schools and 4.5% of secondary school students. A study by researchers at Sheffield Hallam University for the DfES found that an additional 61 schools (1.7% of the total) use partial selection. Sutton Trust research, which looked at 56 LEAs, found that 76 out of the 1,292 schools surveyed (5.9%) use partial selection. If this pattern was repeated across the country, this would mean 5.6% of schools use partial selection.

  We feel that this is likely to be an overestimate[3], but given that the Sutton Trust partial survey found more schools selecting than the "complete" DfES study, it seems clear that the DfES figure is a significant underestimate.

  Our survey also found significant differences between different types of schools. No voluntary-controlled schools selected part of their intake, and only a small number of community schools did. The percentage was much higher for both voluntary-aided and foundation schools:


Sample
By ability
By aptitude
Both
Total using
partial selection

%
%
%
Community
807
4
0.5
7
0.9
(1)
10
1.2
V-controlled
27
0
0.0
0
0.0
(0)
0
0.0
V-aided
238
14
5.9
15
6.3
(5)
24
10.1
Foundation
220
11
5.0
35
15.9
(4)
42
19.1
Total
1,292
29
2.2
57
4.4
(10)
76
5.9


  We estimate that about 80% of schools which use partial selection are self-governing, even though self-governing schools account for just 30% of the total. The percentage of schools which select is also much higher in London than elsewhere. Only 10% of partially selecting schools are in Metropolitan LEAs, even though Metropolitan area schools make up 31% of all schools.

OVERALL

  It is clear that school admissions is a very complicated area. Over 1,200 admissions authorities apply different policies on selection by faith and/or academic and/or aptitude, using a selection from 18 different oversubscription criteria. The picture is further complicated if parents decide to make multiple applications, which may cross LEA borders and procedures.

  But despite-or perhaps in some cases, because-of this complexity, parental satisfaction with the system is high. 85% are satisfied with the admissions process[4], and 91% are satisfied with the outcome. Just 0.5% of parents felt they had no or limited choice. 85% were offered a place at their favoured school, with just 4% not being offered a place at one of their named preferences. Interestingly, half of those who were dissatisfied with the outcome had been offered a place at their favoured school, suggesting they felt constrained as to which schools they could apply. And this is the key: in the case of school admissions, "choice" is something which is disproportionately available to the middle classes.

  This is particularly the case in London, where school quality is starkly different between and even within boroughs. In London, just 68% of parents are offered a place in their favoured school, and 12% launch an appeal (compared to 4% elsewhere). London parents are much more likely to apply for a place outside their own LEA (33% against 11%) and apply to more than one admissions authority (54% against 30%). 40% of London parents did not apply to their nearest state school (30% elsewhere). It is clear from a large number of press articles (The Observer, 24 August 2003) that this is a very important subject for parents in London. We would suggest that the relative ease of travel in the capital and high concern about the state of schools in some boroughs-whether justified or not-contributes to the problems in London.

October 2003






1   This is based on January 2000 statistics. The DfES counted 162 grammar schools and 583 faith schools, 21 of which were also grammar schools. The DfES now recognises 164 grammar schools, although no new grammar schools have opened since then. Back

2   Also, an Islamic school due to open in 2002-was to include selection by lot as an over-subscription criteria. Back

3   Our survey did not include the North East (where there are no grammar schools) Yorkshire and Humberside (where there are a small number) and the South West (where there are slightly more than the national average). Back

4   Data on parental satisfaction and appeals comes from the DfES survey Parents' Experiences of the Processes of Choosing a Secondary School (2001)Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 13 September 2004