Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 213-219)

17 DECEMBER 2003

BARONESS ASHTON OF UPHOLLAND

  Q213 Chairman: Good morning and can I welcome Baroness Ashton to our deliberations. We were just discussing that it is nice to have a minister here to be annually reviewed because they have been in the same post for at least a year and you are more or less in the same job, are you not?

  Baroness Ashton of Upholland: More or less, due to changes because of the creation of the new division.

  Q214 Chairman: It is exciting times in your responsibilities. You will know because I saw you sitting in the public gallery on Monday that we had Margaret Hodge here to talk about this new post that she has and we want to ask you some questions; some will be similar but you will find that there is some novelty in them. Would you like an opportunity of saying how you see the new job and how you complement the Minister in the House of Commons?

  Baroness Ashton of Upholland: I am delighted that we have a Minister for Children and that we have brought together all of the children's responsibilities in one Department. It is something that I have felt very strongly in my role as Minister for Sure Start was needed. I think that we complement each other in two ways. First of all, I have now expanded responsibilities in the House of Lords because I cover not only all education but of course all children's issues as well and that I find very useful because it brings together all of those different strands of what happens in a child's life. Secondly, in policy terms, bringing together the integrated approach to supporting children and their families, not only in the early years, which is what we had started to do as a result of the review last year, but also throughout a child's life into adolescence and of course into adulthood is a very important part of making sure that we provide good services for children and families.

  Q215 Chairman: A lot of people feel that the Government have put an enormous amount of money in Early Years in children's issues at the earlier stages and Sure Start and we are all aware of a whole range of programmes. What are the three best things that the Government has done since 1997?

  Baroness Ashton of Upholland: The best things are first of all the Early Years' education offer to families and children because we know that providing free nursery education for four-year-olds and now all three-year-olds enables children to get a really good start. The evidence shows us that of course it is critical for children, if we are going to break the barriers that exist for some of our poorest children in terms of education achievements, that we start early. Secondly, the increasing offer to families on childcare linked to Early Years' education in order that families who have struggled for a long time to know how to support their children best can work, if they wish to, and can ensure that they have high-quality childcare for their children. I think the family support, the work we are doing to increase the opportunities for families to get support that is, if I can use the word, holistic, that is built around the needs of the family and not the needs of the professionals in the services. For example, a child with a disability can, in some areas, end up with eight or nine different assessments by different agencies. We want to reduce that to an assessment from one agency on behalf of the others and support provided by all the agencies working to the family's needs.

  Q216 Chairman: What about the failures of the Government? Listening to Professor Ainsley- Green, who is the Children's Health and I hesitate to call him "Tsar" but whatever his title is, in his presentation in the House of Commons last night, his sense of his evaluation of how far children are absolutely focused on and targeted in the Health Service was chilling. He pointed out, for example, that there was only one consultant dealing with teenage years in the whole of the United Kingdom and he went through a list of areas where there was no focus on children, where children were incidental and he said that, as he went through health trusts and health areas in this country, he found that there was absolutely no knowledge of what services there were for children and found enormous gaps in provision. We, as a Committee, are going to have to get used to asking questions about health and education because this is a ministerial chain responsibility, but that is chilling stuff after a Government has been in power for six years to be told by Professor Ainsley-Green that there was this tremendous lack of facilities for children.

  Baroness Ashton of Upholland: I think it is something that has been a failure for a long time and the good news of course is that we are beginning to address it. I, as you probably know, have a background in the Health Service as chair of a health authority before I became a minister, so I am very well aware of the prioritisation that children did not get. There are two or three critical things that I would say. First of all, I do not think as governments—and I use the plural in that—we have listened enough to what children need and want and know because actually children themselves are very well aware of the things that they want in life and, whether it is a play review, whether it is through the Green Paper and so on, we are beginning to listen to what children say and that is very important. It is also very important in terms of vulnerability in child protection. I think the second thing is that we have had services that have been very siloed around children, so children have received education or they have received health services or they have received support from different professionals and children, particularly vulnerable children, fall through the net in that way because nobody takes overall responsibility. So, a critical part of the future is actually making sure that we have responsible agencies who, in a sense, do not pass the buck and ensure that children get the services they need and I think those have been failures that now we can address properly.

  Q217 Chairman: Do you think you are going to knit these services together? The Minister yesterday, not actually to this Committee but in another meeting, the same meeting with Professor Ainsley-Green, pointed out that, if you are going to track where children are—and this Committee pushed her on the fact that children go missing. Where are the children? Are they children of people who are in refuges? Are they children of political refugees? Missing children. Children who are born abroad or who are taken abroad—and if you are going to have a register of children, there has to be a system across the piece but we understand that many people in the health sector feel that this is an invasion of privacy and that they will not share a health identification system across the piece with people outside the health centre. How are you going to stop that sort of problem?

  Baroness Ashton of Upholland: I think a lot of progress has actually been made. For example, with the Sure Start programmes, some of which are led by the Department of Health because Sure Start of course was in the Department of Health until a year ago, a lot of work has gone on making sure that health services are working effectively with other services and I think it is a combination of trust between professionals who know that to make sure information is available appropriately to other professionals would ensure that children get a better deal, and having the right systems in place. We have a health service that has been brought up to believe, and rightly so, in confidentiality between patient and doctor. We have to make sure that we retain that but that we also ensure that the systems work, so that a child who is in danger or who is vulnerable in some way does not lose out because we cannot make those systems talk to each other effectively.

  Chairman: Thank you for those introductory discussions.

  Q218 Mr Turner: Your specific responsibilities are described as Sure Start, Early Years and Childcare, the foundation stage of the curriculum, and special educational needs, yet your ministerial title omits the latter, which does not overlap in the same way as the first group of responsibilities do and those in your title. Do you think that reflects appropriately the importance of special educational needs?

  Baroness Ashton of Upholland: I hope it does not detract from it. I am a passionate Minister about special educational needs. I do a huge amount of work. We are about to publish a new strategy and you may have seen that we published a report on special schools from a working group that I set up to advise us on the future of special schools. I hope that, in my ministerial duties, I give the correct balance to different parts of my portfolio. I have no objection to being called the Minister of Sure Start and Special Educational Needs. One always ends up with shorthand for a title because of course there are other responsibilities that I have too, but I hope that, in carrying out my duties, people, particularly in the special educational needs field, would see that I do work and respect them and also make sure that I represent their views.

  Q219 Jeff Ennis: I think the Government has been quite successful in many of the Early Years' initiatives we have introduced like the Sure Start, Neighbourhood Nurseries, Extended Schools etc. How will the new Children's Trusts bring all these together in a cohesive fashion, shall we say? How will they assist in that process?

  Baroness Ashton of Upholland: Part of the reason for piloting the 35 pathfinders is to find out what works. I think there are two points on that. The first is that I feel quite strongly that different ways of collaborating will work differently in different areas of the country because there are some very good examples already of real collaboration between health, education and social care that exist in different parts of the country that look quite different to each other and my view is that we need to set the framework of collaboration with children's trusts, remove the barriers that prevent money being used as effectively as it might, which is always critical, build on what the professionals have always told me which is that they want to be able to work together more effectively and ensure that, at the heart of that is developing the services around the needs of children. What I think the pathfinders will tell us—and the evaluation is going to happen, in a sense, simultaneously—are ways in which it is clearly going to work more effectively than others, so that we can spread that information across to others who will follow. What I hope they will do is build on, in a sense, the principles that Sure Start establish which is that, if you have a collaborative approach to families and build services around them, you can support children more effectively.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 22 July 2004