Select Committee on Education and Skills Memoranda


Entry to Employment (E2E)

MEMORANDUM SUBMITTED BY THE LEARNING AND SKILLS COUNCIL

ABOUT THE LEARNING AND SKILLS COUNCIL

The Learning and Skills Council (LSC) is responsible for all publicly-funded post -16 education and training in England, other than higher education.

For the year 2003-04, the LSC has a budget of over £8 billion, to support:

  • further education
  • school sixth forms
  • work-based learning for young people
  • workforce development
  • adult and community learning
  • information, advice and guidance for adults
  • education business links.

The LSC is a national organisation, with 47 local LSCs based throughout England. The local LSCs plan and fund provision to meet local needs. In January 2004, the LSC announced a new regional management structure in order to develop relationships with key partners at regional level.

The LSC is committed to removing barriers faced by anyone wanting to undertake education or training.

The mission of the Learning and Skills Council is:

To raise participation and attainment through high-quality education and training which puts learners first

The vision of the Learning and Skills Council is:

By 2010, young people and adults in England will have knowledge and productive skills matching the best in the world



EVIDENCE

1  The Learning and Skills Council (LSC) is pleased to submit this memorandum to the Committee regarding the first part of its inquiry National Skills Strategy:14-19 Education.

2  The note is in two parts. The first part (paragraphs 3 to 22) describes how Success for All provides comprehensive linkages between the Skills Strategy and 14-19 reform (and the Higher Education strategy), and the second part (paragraphs 23 to 35) provides a summary of key relevant initiatives where the LSC is taking the lead.

SUCCESS FOR ALL

3  The strategy document Success for All was published by the DfES in November 2002. The strategy, which is jointly owned by the DfES and the LSC, seeks to offer:

  • 14-19 learners greater choice and higher standards with clear academic and vocational progression routes to higher education and employment

  • adult learners increased access to excellent provision for basic skills, training for work and learning for personal development

  • employers much more productive engagement with a transformed network of further education colleges and other providers committed to meeting regional and sub-regional skill needs.

4  Success for All covers all providers of education and training funded by the LSC. Its implementation will, however, take account of the different statutory and contractual positions of providers.

SUCCESS FOR ALL AND THE SKILLS STRATEGY

5  At the heart of the Success for All strategy is the need to make providers of education and training more responsive to employer and skill needs. The strategy includes: targets for every college for employer engagement; a new planning framework for skills involving Regional Development Agencies and Sector Skills Councils; expansion of the Centres of Vocational Excellence network to 400; more funding of units of qualifications; updating vocational training facilities; and greater use of e-learning to meet the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises.

6  As part of the strategy, each local LSC is leading Strategic Area Reviews (StARs) of provision in their area, supported by local education authorities and other key local stakeholders, including employers. The overall objectives of StARs are to ensure that there is:

  • the right mix of provision of the right quality to meet learner, employer and community needs and drive up standards and success rates

  • in each part of the country a network of providers which are clear about their unique contribution and is working collaboratively to achieve educational and economic success.

7  Although StARs are being undertaken within a national framework, there is no national "blueprint" for the organisation of provision at a local level. What is being sought is that provision in a local area should be coherent, with each provider making a distinct contribution. Individual providers are being asked to establish an educational and training mission, or review their current mission, to focus on their strengths.

8  Each college will agree with the local LSC a three-year development plan which will include, amongst other things, employer engagement targets. The employer engagement targets may represent new activity or extension of existing activity, and will cover such things as the development of improved services to employers, enhancement of the employability or work-readiness of learners.

SUCCESS FOR ALL AND 14-19 REFORM

9  The Success for All strategy supports 14-19 reform in a number of ways.

10  Strategic Area Reviews should result in increased curriculum choice, particularly in vocational courses, and greater collaboration between providers. These developments will enable the development of individual learning plans, tailored to a young person's abilities and aspirations.

11  The teaching and learning strategy aims to drive up standards of teaching and learning. The strategy will provide advice, information and training for all staff involved in the learning of young people on such things as: effective teaching methods; assessment; programme content; and e-learning, and will provide supporting materials.

12  Additional capital funding has been provided for colleges, with five priorities:

  • to update and improve vocational training facilities
  • to transform facilities for ICT-supported learning
  • to ensure facilities comply with the Disability Discrimination Act
  • to support structural change, expand successful provision for 16-19 year olds, develop new facilities for 14-16 year olds outside school
  • to carry through the implications of StARs.

13  The LSC welcomed the progress report from Mike Tomlinson's Working Group on 14-19 Reform, and is closely involved in taking that work forward. The structural changes which the Government has put in place - such as the establishment of the LSC, the Connexions Service and the development of Sector Skills Councils - have given a much clearer context for the activity and achievements of young people. The wider remit of Ofsted and the linkages which are being established between Area Wide Inspections and Strategic Area Reviews are helping to identify both the needs of a locality and appropriate ways of meeting those needs. It is important to recognise that in a number of local areas these curriculum reforms will take place at the same time as institutional reorganisation. In this context, it is helpful to see that the proposals in the progress report are consistent with the five key principles which Ministers have adopted to underpin the organisation of 16-19 provision.

14  The Tomlinson proposals are radical, and whilst it is relatively easy to agree with the broad principles for reform, there will be huge challenges in making those principles a reality. It is essential that they are implementable.

15  It is clear that there is a wide acceptance that there is a distinct phase of learning for young people which prepares them for higher education and employment. For many young people - but by no means all - that phase will start at 14 and end at 19: the reference to 14-19 reform is, therefore, a label, rather than a prescription. Equally, the phase must always be consistent with what precedes it, and what follows, and should encourage progression into the phase from Key Stage 3; progression through the phase; and have clear lines of progression into higher education or employment.

16  Tomlinson presents a powerful argument for a radical, and necessary, reform of the 14-19 curriculum, and demands and proposes a fresh approach to teaching and learning, and assessment. It will be important to retain a commitment to radical reform, and to develop an ever more compelling argument to present to those resistant to, or cautious about, change. It is essential that, in particular, higher education and employers accept the force of the argument for reform. Fundamental to that reform is that the learner is at the heart of the system. All providers will need to be flexible in order to meet learner needs effectively and the system itself will need to offer genuine opportunities for flexibility and collaboration. This will be of particular importance in developing the pathways from Key Stage 3 and enhanced opportunities for work-related and work-based learning.

17  Finally, those radical reforms can be implemented successfully only by a highly skilled, professional and committed staff - teaching and support - in schools, colleges and learning providers. We would urge that Government should not impose on the goodwill of those staff, but should adequately resource the transition and should recognise the importance of the professional judgement of staff. Teaching and support staff will need to undertake substantial professional development at the same time as implementing radical reform: there are clear dangers of overstretching the capacity of staff to deliver. One of the key features of successful initiatives in the past has been that the reforms motivate the staff who are being asked to deliver them: the Tomlinson proposals appear to have that potential.

SUCCESS FOR ALL AND THE HIGHER EDUCATION STRATEGY

18  The Higher Education strategy confirms the commitments in Success for All to develop foundation degrees, create better links between further and higher education and create better pathways for progression.

19  The LSC is seeking to:

  • ensure the development and promulgation of clear vocational and work based progression pathways from school and college to higher education

  • ensure employer engagement with Centres of Vocational Excellence and Foundation Degree developments

  • plan for and develop more locally-delivered (and more part-time) higher education

  • ensure that Strategic Area Reviews play a part in planning opportunities for progression into higher education

  • ensure that local LSCs are fully involved with regional skills agendas and with the Aimhigher initiative

  • consider to what extent "HE in FE" is distinctive and what role the LSC needs to play in the development of this distinctiveness

  • consider how "non-prescribed" HE should fit into the framework of other higher education provision delivered in further education colleges.

20  In particular, the Council expects to promote the opportunities available for progression into higher education through vocationally-related and work-based routes, through:

  • a vocational qualification at Level 2 or a Foundation Modern Apprenticeship in the same/related curriculum area leading to an Advanced Modern Apprenticeship, and through to HE or

  • an NVQ at Level 3 leading to a Foundation Degree/HND or

  • a Level 3 qualification leading directly to an honours degree.

INCREASED FLEXIBILITY PROGRAMME

21  The LSC is managing this programme jointly with the DfES. The programme began in September 2002, initially for a two-year period. Its aim was to launch the eight new GCSEs in vocational subjects and create vocational and work-related learning. Delivery of the programme is between partnerships between colleges, schools and other partners (such as Universities, Education Business Partnerships, Work-based learning providers, Local Education Authorities, Connexions, Learning Partnerships).

22  In the first year of the programme there were 270 partnerships, most led by colleges, with around 1,800 secondary schools (over half of all schools in England) and over 42,000 year 10 pupils involved. Around 60% of the young people were undertaking at least one of the new GCSEs. From September 2003, the number of partnerships has risen from 270 to 282 and participating schools have risen to over 2,000. Participating pupil numbers are expected to be around 80,000.

23  Evaluation of the first year of the programme from LLSCs, Ofsted, LSDA and DfES all indicate that the programme is attractive to learners and providers and adds value to the learning experience for pupils in this age range. A costing study undertaken on behalf of DfES and LSC provides robust evidence on the costs of collaborative delivery under the programme. It largely confirms what had been previously known anecdotally: that collaborative provision costs more.

MODERN APPRENTICESHIPS

24  In September 2001, a report from a committee chaired by Sir John Cassels made recommendations for a national MA framework that defined basic standards for content and duration. The report also established two targets for the start of the academic year 2004: an entitlement to a MA place for 16 and 17 year olds with five or more GCSEs and a target that 175,000 young people would start a MA before the age of 22.

25  Apprenticeships normally last between one and three years, and are at two levels: Foundation (NVQ2) and Advanced (NVQ3). Both levels lead to a NVQ in specific occupational areas, Key Skills qualifications and technical certificates providing underpinning knowledge of the NVQ. Modern apprenticeships are available in 150 or so occupational areas.

26  A high-level National Task Force, chaired by Sir Roy Gardner, has been established by the Chancellor to ensure that the MA programme continues to grow in breadth, quality and numbers. The Task Force has as its two main aims increasing employer engagement and ensuring that MAs are fit for purpose.

27  Whilst the main focus of activity has been to promote and develop MAs, work is also underway to ensure the place of MAs within a coherent national framework of education and training. As part of that work, the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) and the University Vocational Awards Council are working together on proposals to assign UCAS tariff points to Advanced MAs.

28  Entry to Employment (E2E), is a new scheme aimed at youngsters aged 16-18 who are not involved in employment, education or training. From August 2003, E2E has replaced Life Skills, Preparatory Training and Other Training at Level 1 on the work-based learning route. It helps young people prepare for Modern Apprenticeships and other types of learning.

29  The planning assumption for is 50,000 young people starting E2E with a budget of £168m with early indication that the demand for E2E is high. The LSC has given a guarantee that no young person eligible for and able to benefit from E2E will be denied access to provision.

30  Through the LSDA, there is a comprehensive support and development programme for E2E. The LSC is working closely with ALI, Connexions, the Standards Unit and QCA across a range of areas directly pertinent to E2E, including initial assessment and referral, inspection, teaching and learning materials for E2E and the review of entry level qualifications.

31  Early evidence suggests that E2E is succeeding in engaging those young people previously disaffected or disengaged from formal education and training.

EMPLOYER TRAINING PILOTS

32  Employer Training Pilots, which began in September 2002, provide free or

subsidised training to a first level 2 qualification and in basic skills. The pilots feature compensation at different levels for employers that give time off work to employees to train. The pilots help employers identify basic and vocational skills gaps that affect productivity, and enable them to make decisions about training to improve business performance.

33  The pilots began in six local LSC areas, with a further six being added in November 2002 and six more to begin in 2004. By December 2003, over 5,600 employers and 22,000 employees had taken part in the pilots.

34  Independent evaluation of the pilots shows that the pilots were reaching the employees with poor skills they were designed to target, and that over a fifth of the employers involved were those regarded as "hard-to-reach" - firms that did not traditionally get involved in training. Seventy percent of the employers were small businesses with fewer than 50 employees. Employees involved were typically female aged over 35 who worked full-time in low-skilled jobs in small firms. Three-quarters of the employees involved had left school at or before the age of 16, most had no qualifications and only a third had had a positive experience of education. Whilst few employees had completed their learning, employers and learners expressed high levels of satisfaction, and drop-out rates were reported by employers as very low.



Centres of Vocational Excellence (CoVEs)

35  The Centres of Vocational Excellence (CoVEs) initiative has as its aims:

  • to establish 400 CoVEs in the Further Education and training sector by 2006
  • to increase and strengthen active employer/college engagement
  • to secure enhanced vocational learning opportunities for all learners in Further Education, work based learning providers and 14-19 year olds in schools
  • to encourage collaboration amongst providers and promote the concept of excellence in economically important vocational specialisms.

36  249 CoVEs established to date, of which 213 are in colleges and the remainder in WBL providers and training arms of major companies, e.g. BAE, British Gas. Early evaluation is very positive. 81% of CoVEs showed growth in the number of learners and two-thirds forecast increases in achievement levels. CoVEs have increased collaboration with employers and most employers surveyed reported high levels of satisfaction with the service they received

37  CoVEs primarily focus on level 3 skills and on upskilling the existing workforce. However, CoVEs also focus on meeting skills needs through training new entrants to the workforce. Most CoVEs deliver MAs and many are involved (or are planning to be involved) in delivering vocational GCSEs. All CoVEs also work closely with schools to help inform pupils' vocational options and to secure seamless progression routes.

NATIONAL CONTRACTS SERVICE

38  The National Contracts Service was set up by the LSC to provide a highly effective, professional contracting arm for the LSC's dealings with large, multi-site employers and providers who carry out training for them. The Service simplifies the relationship between the LSC and major employers, who do not have to enter into separate contracts with individual local LSCs.

39  The Service seeks to bring prominent, large national employers into work-based training to improve workforce skills, often through training schemes tailored to their specific needs. The Service targets companies with over 1,000 employees, the potential to have at least 100 learners and which operate in at least five local LSC areas.

40  There are two main programmes: work-based learning for young people aged 16-24, including Modern Apprenticeships (about 45,000 learners currently); and the Over-24 Initiative, including NVQ level 2 and 3 and basic skills (about 24,000 learners). The Service currently has contracts worth £200 million with around 200 employers and training providers working on their behalf. Among the employers already involved are BMW and Nissan, Orange, BP, British Gas, BAE Systems, the RAF and the Royal Navy.

January 2004



 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 6 February 2004