Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


APPENDIX 5

Memorandum from the Crop Protection Association

THE VOLUNTARY INITIATIVE

  In November 2002 the Crop Protection Association submitted to the Chairman of the Environmental Audit Committee its response (see Annex) to a submission from Friends of the Earth and PAN-UK on the Voluntary Initiative (VI).[20]

  The Association's response to their latest (December 2003) submission is set out below.

  Both Friends of the Earth and PAN-UK are members of the Voluntary Initiative Steering Group. This is the body that oversees the implementation of the Voluntary Initiative under the independent chairmanship of Professor Barry Dent. As such they have had the opportunity to provide input to the decisions made by the Steering Group on the implementation, monitoring and reporting of the Initiative.

SUMMARY

  The crop protection and farming industries are highly committed to delivering the environmental objectives of the Voluntary Initiative.

  The first step to achieving these is to change behaviour—a fact that is reflected in the best practice indicators for the VI on which good progress is being made.

  Progress to date indicates that the Voluntary Initiative is on course for success.

OBJECTIVES OF THE VOLUNTARY INITIATIVE

  The overall objective of the Voluntary Initiative is to minimise the environmental impacts of pesticide use (1). It aims to achieve this through defining and promoting best practice in pesticide use. It recognises that decisions need to be made on a local basis to ensure that pesticides are used only when needed and that the right product is used in the right place, at the right time and at the right dose. The approach is not prescriptive.

  A programme of research, training and information provision facilitates this Best Practice approach.

TARGETS

  The Steering Group has agreed all the changes that have been made to the targets. The Minister has asked the Steering Group to review several targets and this work is currently being undertaken (2).

THE ROLE OF THE ASSURANCE SCHEMES

  The Voluntary Initiative is just that—voluntary. The Boards of the Assurance Schemes decided to incorporate various aspects of the VI in the Schemes (membership of which is voluntary).

REACHING FARMERS

  The Voluntary Initiative has used various means to get its message across to farmers including media campaigns and personal contact.

  Activity has been higher in the pilot water catchments because the objective is to try out various techniques to reduce the amounts of pesticides reaching water. When the most successful have been identified then these can be used elsewhere.

GOOD PROGRESS

  All 27 projects in the Voluntary Initiative are on track apart from one (indicator farms).

  Excellent progress has been made in the three key actions for farmers

    National Register of Sprayer Operators

  8,620 operators have now registered, thereby undertaking to update their training each year through Continual Professional Development. The target is 15,000 operators by 31 March 2004.

    National Sprayer Testing Scheme

  2,549 sprayers have been tested to ensure accurate application and safety to the environment. The target is 5,000 sprayers by 31 March 2004.

    Crop Protection Management Plans

  More than 365,000 ha are now covered. The target is 200,000 ha by 31 March 2004.

CROP PROTECTION MANAGEMENT PLANS

  Completing a Crop Protection Management Plan is the first step in getting farmers to take greater account of the environment when planning their crop protection activities. They will then be encouraged to improve their performance in subsequent years.

REPORTING OF COSTS

  The VI signatories have responded to the Environmental Audit Committee's request for information on the cost of the Initiative. The Steering Group agreed the reporting format at its meeting on 3 April 2003.

DISPOSAL OF OBSOLETE PESTICIDES

  Only a limited number of farmers will have a problem with stocks of non-approved pesticides in their stores. It is fair that they should bear the cost of disposal. Those who manage their crop protection efficiently should not be asked to subsidise those who do not.

  The Voluntary Initiative has sought to minimise these costs by facilitating a milk-round approach with the waste disposal companies.

AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION

  Relevant information is freely available to the Steering Group and posted on the Voluntary Initiative website (www.voluntaryinitiative.org.uk).

  Friends of the Earth was the only Steering Group member to request the full report of the Cherwell study (work funded by Aventis (now Bayer CropScience) and completed two years prior to the VI). The survey on farm waste was placed on the VI website as soon as it was released by its sponsors.

THE WAY FORWARD

  The VI Steering Group has discussed with the Government ways in which the Voluntary Initiative can link in with other activities and policies relating to pesticide use. Agreement was reached on a number of areas.

  In addition the proposed National Pesticide Strategy includes the Voluntary Initiative as one of the range of measures relating to pesticides. It states that "The Government has taken the view that provided the VI is fully implemented, it should be the most effective way of reducing the environmental impacts of pesticides and could therefore have an important part to play within a broader pesticide strategy." (3)

  (1)  Minimising the Environmental Impacts of Crop Protection chemicals—revised proposals—February 2001 (Crop Protection Association).

  (2)  Voluntary Initiative Steering Group minutes 9 December 2003.

  (3)  Pesticides Forum paper—Draft National Pesticides Strategy—PSD—October 2003.

January 2004



20   See Environmental Audit Committee's First Report of Session 2002-03, Pesticides: the Voluntary Initiative, HC 100, Ev 35-42. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 19 March 2004