Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


APPENDIX 8

Memorandum from the Environment Agency

SUMMARY

  As we said in our memorandum of evidence for the PBR of 2002, we warmly welcome the Treasury's continuing development of its environmental tax strategy and its keen engagement with stakeholders. This has the potential to give environmental taxation the momentum that it needs, at a high enough level, to help achieve better environmental outcomes more effectively and efficiently. We are concerned to see faster progress with proposed measures. The Treasury should be encouraged to set out a systematic plan of action for developing green taxation, based on substantial analysis and consultation.

  Environmental tax measures need to be based on good analysis and need to:

    —  Identify the likely responses to tax proposals by firms and individuals, seeking to ensure that "winners" are supportive and issues for "losers" are dealt with by practical measures.

    —  Co-ordinate ways in which taxation and other economic instruments operate as one element in packages of measures to address complex social and environmental issues.

    —  Focus on ways in which environmental policy instruments can be refined over time in light of experience gained on their application.

  The Environment Agency can contribute our practical experience to these analyses.

SPECIFIC PROPOSALS IN PBR 2003

  We broadly welcome the specific proposals in the PBR 2003. In particular, we welcome the proposals to recycle landfill tax revenues through a broad package of measures, which should be pursued to secure environmental benefits and promote appropriate efficient and innovative solutions.

  However, there are gaps in the measures being proposed. The review of Aviation did not take this opportunity to seek measures to account for the significant environmental costs of aviation, so that the recent developments in aviation policy could be made more sustainable.

  We welcome the announcement to consult in early 2004 on tackling diffuse water pollution, including a consideration of economic instruments. There needs to be a positive and clear assessment of economic instruments as part of an integrated package of the measures needed to tackle diffuse water pollution.

ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF PBR

  We welcome the Treasury's preparation and presentation of the environmental appraisal tables, which are helpful. They highlight the need for effective taxes and economic instruments for protecting the countryside and natural resources, including, in particular, water quality and water resources.

  These tables should be more quantified in future to clearly show the range of environmental impacts. The analysis that should underlie any tax proposals will be able to provide the quantitative data needed.

HOUSING SUPPLY

  The Treasury published the interim Barker report on the review of housing supply and the Miles report on the review of the mortgage market alongside the PBR. We recognise the need to reduce the volatility and increases in house prices and improve the operation of the housing market.

  There must be careful consideration of the significant environmental implications of housing development. In particular, this must address effects on natural habitats, demands for water and implications for the consumption of energy and the generation of wastes and water pollution.

January 2004



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 19 March 2004