Select Committee on Environmental Audit Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary letter to the Chairman of the Committee from Elliot Morley MP, Minister for Environment and Agri-Environment, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

  1.  When I appeared before your committee on 11 March, I was invited to send supplementary information in response to some questions.

COSTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME

  2.  The Committee asked for an estimate of the costs of the environment programme outlined in the Principal Guidance.

  3.  While I wish to assist the Committee there are difficulties in providing a figure. Our policy decisions for the principal guidance used costs and price limit implications derived, by Ofwat, from companies' draft business plans submitted in August 2003. I made the point in my evidence that the costs of all elements of companies' business plans will continue to move until Ofwat sets final price limits at the end of the year.

  4.  Ofwat offered advice to the Secretary of State, published on 19 December 2003. This set out the capital costs associated with two different policy packages, according to the costings used by companies in their draft business plans (Annex A). Neither of these packages corresponds to the combination of policies set out in the principal guidance. But it may help the Committee to note that the principal guidance includes virtually all the measures costed by companies as reference plan A and in addition some of those in reference plan B. In looking at the figures in Ofwat's December advice, whether for the capital costs of investment or the price limit consequences, the Committee will also wish to note that the environment investment programme is a subset of the quality investment programme (which also includes drinking water improvements) which in turn is part of total capital investment (including also capital maintenance).

  5.  I share with the Committee the wish to see fully scrutinised and challenged figures of costs and their effect on customer bills, for the exact programme that we have asked companies to develop. Companies will now prepare their final business plans, based on the principal guidance programme. I look to Ofwat to scrutinise and challenge the costs. Information about the plans will be made public.

DIFFUSE POLLUTION

  6.  The Committee requested copies of the diffuse pollution papers when they are available. We will be consulting on a broad range of economic instruments to tackle agricultural diffuse pollution at the end of this month. We will send the Committee the consultation document, along with any supplementary papers.

AFFORDABILITY

  7.  The Committee asked whether new measures on the affordability of water will be in place when the new price limits are implemented on 1 April 2005. It is too early to say what might be the outcome of our review of existing measures on water affordability. The only specific Government measure already in preparation is the further proposed changes to the Vulnerable Groups scheme, on which we consulted in 2003. In the light of the responses received to the consultation paper, the Government is finalising plans for revised regulations. The changes will be announced in a response to the consultation and will come into effect in April 2005 to coincide with the new price limits.

METERING

  8.  The Committee asked for the percentage of customers who are metered and how to increase awareness that meters are free to install and may offer savings to customers. Overall, 24% of customers in England and Wales are metered and this figure is increasing at a rate of 1-2% per year. There is variation between household and non-household customers and also between companies (Annex B).

  9.  Companies, encouraged by Ofwat, give customers information about the free meter option and meter savings along with their water bills.

  10.  The Department has also published a free information leaflet, "Water Metering: Your new rights", setting out household water customers' new rights under the Water Industry Act 1999 including the new right to free meter installation. Copies were supplied to all water companies and were also distributed widely through such routes as Citizens' Advice Bureaux, libraries, benefits offices and local authorities. We have also continued to co-operate with others in disseminating information, for example the Consumers' Association published an article about the basis of water charging and the choices open to customers.

March 2004

Annex A

Table 1

ESTIMATES OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE IN PERIOD 2005-06 TO 2009-10 TO MEET DRINKING WATER QUALITY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER RELATED IMPROVEMENT DRIVERS

  Advice to inform the principal guidance on scale and timing of further quality enhancements: open letter to Ministers (Ofwat 19/12/03)

  Updates of company estimates

  Following queries and further information from some companies (see note 1)
Main drivers for drinking water quality, environmental and other related improvements Capital expenditure in 2005-10 £ million
Reference Plan A Reference Plan B
WATER SERVICE
Water treatment works improvements570 640
Distribution system renovation740 740
Lead communication pipe replacement370 870
Improvements to taste and odour of drinking water 210260
Other improvements (includes resilience of water systems) 6060
DRINKING WATER QUALITY SUB TOTAL 1,9502,570
Changes to water systems to improve the environment 230540
WATER SERVICE SUB TOTAL2,180 3,110
SEWERAGE SERVICE
Urban waste water treatment directive at STWks 7401,120
Intermittent discharges from sewerage systems 9501,030
Sewage sludge treatment and IPPC requirements 90170
Freshwater fish directive (see note 2) 301,620
Bathing waters directive160 390
Shellfish waters directive0 1,790
Nature conservation (includes Habitats directive & SSSIs) 870930
Ground water protection660 670
Removal of trace contaminants from STWks effluents 100220
Endocrine disruptors demonstration project 040
Land management schemes0 340
Local schemes for improving the water environment 220870
Completing the AMP3 programme + other (see note 3) 450490
Section A (see note 4)620 620
SEWERAGE SERVICE SUB TOTAL4,890 10,300
TOTAL—QUALITY ENHANCEMENTS 7,07013,410


  Notes

  1.  These estimates are drawn from the supporting information submitted by water companies with their Draft Business Plans but expressed in net terms after the application of the reference level assumptions for improvements in efficiency.

  2.  The plan B number includes some companies' estimates for more work than sought by the EA.

  3.  At PR99 Ofwat assumed some quality enhancement schemes would be delivered in the period April to December 2005. The costs for these schemes will need to be allowed for in setting price limits for 2005-10.

  4.  Section A covers improvements falling outside the formal National Environment Programme and improvement requirements that have arisen since the 1999 determination.

Annex B

Table 2

WATER CUSTOMERS 2003-04
Unmeasured Supplies Metered Supplies Proportion metered
HouseholdsNon-households HouseholdsNon-households HouseholdsNon-households
(thousands of customers) (percentage)
Water & sewerage companies
Anglian859.515.5 926.3109.351.9 87.6
Dwr Cymru 964.714.8 205.887.117.6 85.5
Northumbrian:
  Northumbrian931.5 16.792.046.5 9.073.5
  Essex & Suffolk438.7 4.9249.738.0 36.388.5
Severn Trent2,308.014.0 694.0211.023.1 93.8
South West383.25.5 260.365.740.5 92.3
Southern 691.414.5 231.451.125.1 77.9
Thames2,549.124.6 639.4179.620.1 87.9
United Utilities 2,328.2 21.2412.8183.2 15.189.6
Wessex324.57.8 150.946.131.7 85.5
Yorkshire:
  Yorkshire1,334.7 19.5466.7109.4 25.984.9
  York67.20.6 7.34.59.8 88.7
WaSC Total13,180.7 159.64,336.5 1,131.424.8 87.6
Water only companies
Bournemouth & W Hampshire115.1 1.155.613.3 32.692.6
Bristol346.78.3 92.833.821.1 80.3
Cambridge52.51.0 57.18.952.1 89.6
Cholderton0.60.0 0.0.13.628.6
Dee Valley72.20.9 31.07.430.0 89.3
Folkestone & Dover40.7 0.824.44.4 37.484.3
Mid Kent144.31.8 72.619.833.5 91.5
Portsmouth259.42.6 9.815.03.7 85.2
South East388.17.1 149.634.127.8 82.8
South Staffordshire426.9 6.669.931.1 14.182.6
Sutton & East Surrey206.8 2.841.113.3 16.682.7
Tendring Hundred26.80.1 37.24.958.1 98.4
Three Valleys:
  Three Valleys773.2 9.4186.946.3 19.583.1
  North Surrey145.7 1.737.810.1 20.685.8
WoC Total2,999.1 44.1865.8 242.322.484.6
Industry Total16,179.8 203.75,202.31,373.7 24.387.1



  Notes:

  a.  Figures are company estimates of customers servied in 2003-04.

  b.  The totals may not add up due to rounding.

  Ofwat: Tarrif structure and charges 2003-04 report.


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 6 May 2004