Select Committee on Environmental Audit Ninth Report


Introduction


The Scope of the Inquiry

1. On 12 February 2004, the Sub-committee on environmental crime announced that, following its inquiry into Environmental Crime and the Courts, it would hold an inquiry into fly-tipping, fly-posting, litter, graffiti and noise. During the previous inquiry, fly-tipping had been identified by many witnesses as a particularly difficult area to tackle, and one which was growing not just in public prominence but in extent and impact.[1] The Sub-committee was also disturbed by the extent of what many consider to be low level environmental crime, such as littering and graffiti, which yet had an enormous impact upon the local environment and which was seen as a particular area of concern by very many communities across the country.

2. In its press release, the Sub-committee expressed a desire in particular to hear responses to the following questions;

  • What is the scale of the impact of these crimes on the local environment?
  • Has there been a cultural change in attitudes to these kind of crimes and are they being treated more or less seriously than in the past?
  • Do responsible bodies who deal with the problem and its consequences have sufficient resources and powers to do so?
  • Is there sufficient dialogue and cooperation across Government and amongst the various bodies responsible for dealing with the problem at a local level?
  • What alternatives exist for dealing with these types of crimes outside the criminal justice system?
  • Does local environmental crime have a disproportionate impact on poorer and less advantaged sections of society?

As with the previous Report based upon the work of the Sub-committee, this Report deals only with England and Wales.

3. Thirty-four memoranda were received, some of which were supplementary to evidence sessions. Oral evidence was heard from eight individuals or organisations. We are grateful for all the evidence given to the Sub-committee during this inquiry. In addition, the Sub-committee visited Leeds in order to find out how the local council there was dealing with local environmental crime. We would like to thank former Councillor Gerry Harper and all those at Leeds City Council who made the visit so informative and directly relevant to the work of the Sub-committee and the scope of its inquiry. The Sub-committee was very much impressed by the enthusiasm and energy shown by the Council and its staff in trying to tackle fly-tipping, fly-posting, litter, graffiti and noise.


1   Environmental Audit Committee, Sixth Report of Session 2003-04, Environmental Crime and the Courts , HC 126: see, for example, Ev5-8 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 28 July 2004