Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


APPENDIX 5

Memorandum from the Colne Valley Society

  Re:  "Environmental Crime—Fly-Tipping, Fly-Posting, Litter, Graffiti and Noise".

  This Society has been asked by the Civic Trust to comment on the above; we reply as follows:

  1.  What is the scale of the impact of these crimes on the local environment?

High. Ours is a semi-rural area, the rural parts of which in particular are not cleaned adequately by the local authority (Kirklees Metropolitan Council).

  2.  Has there been a cultural change in attitudes to these kinds of crimes and are they being treated more or less seriously than in the past?

  We feel that the general public has less civic pride than ever and thus the problems get worse.

  Punishments for offenders are inadequate.

  There is a perception amongst some people that our local authority "goes through the motions".

  3.  Do responsible bodies who deal with the problem and its consequences have sufficient powers and resources to do so?

  No, budgetary constraints are always an issue. We also suggest that powers be given to authorities to clean-up private property and charge the owners. However, see comment (2).

  4.  Is there sufficient dialogue and co-operation across Government and amongst the various bodies responsible for dealing with the problem at a local level?

  We find that lack of inside knowledge makes this difficult to comment on as a general rule. However in the Kirklees area the introduction of waste-collection charges from private households (for large items and garden waste) has become a political issue, one side claiming it to be successful and the other promising to drop it if re-elected.

  Kirklees Council would have the public believe that the charges have not led to an increase in fly-tipping, but anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise.

  5.  What alternatives exist for dealing with these types of crimes outside the criminal justice system?

  Regulation of food take-aways.

  The education of schoolchildren, who we feel are responsible for most of the litter and a lot of graffiti.

  On-the-spot fines, as have been used in Calderdale (Halifax). This could be self-funding.

  Better enforcement by local councils—ours has been presented with addressed envelopes fly-tipped but claimed that unless the culprit is caught red-handed "there is nothing we can do".

  6.  Does environmental crime have a disproportionate impact on poorer and less advantaged sections of society?

  Yes, particularly as the introduction of collection charges affects them most and they generally live in the more neglected areas. It has been suggested however that this section of society is the one most responsible for the problems in the first place.

  We apologise for the brevity of our comments, but given the extremely short window allowed for replies this is all we have had time for. Many societies such as ours meet once monthly and it was only by coincidence that we were able to help at all.

February 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 28 July 2004