Select Committee on Environmental Audit Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum from HM Customs and Excise

INTRODUCTION

  1.  This memorandum sets out the response of HM Customs and Excise to the questions on wildlife crime in the Sub-Committee's announcement of this current inquiry. Customs have a number of responsibilities at the frontier involving animals and wildlife but we have confined this memorandum to those concerned with the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES).

CUSTOMS' ROLE IN RELATION TO ENDANGERED SPECIES

  2.  Customs enforce import and export controls in relation to traffic to and from third countries in those species (and their parts or derivatives) covered by EU Regulation 338/97. Customs contribute to the multi-agency approach to prevent and deter the illegal international trade in endangered species by:

    —  ensuring that declared trade is accompanied by the correct documentation; and

    —  detecting illegal goods at import or export and taking enforcement action including seizure and confiscation of the goods and prosecution in appropriate cases.

  3.  Customs have contributed to a number of initiatives on CITES enforcement, including work with the World Customs Organisation, the EU CITES Enforcement Group, and the Interpol European Wildlife Crime Sub Group, as well as supporting Defra at the Conference of the Parties. Customs are members of PAW—the Partnership for Action against Wildlife Crime, where we have contributed to training and capability raising projects. In addition to using intelligence internally, we work closely with the National Wildlife Crime Intelligence Unit (NWCIU).

Question (1):  What is the scale and impact of wildlife crime?

  4.  Customs are aware of the demand within the UK for exotic species of all descriptions and that some of this demand is met by the smuggling of endangered species or high-value derivatives. We publish current fraud risks and trends in our internal guidance to front line Customs staff. We look to PAW partners, though, and especially Defra and NWCIU, to produce risk assessments of the scale and impact of wildlife crime, which in turn inform our targeting.

  5.  Appendix A provides summary information of seizures of endangered species by Customs in the last three years. We provide statistical information on seizures to Defra who, as the Management Authority for the UK, remit them to the CITES Secretariat and the European Commission for publication. The current areas of concern in respect of smuggling include:

    —  live reptiles, in particular chameleons and tortoises;

    —  plants, including orchids and cycads;

    —  timber, the majority involving Ramin, but we have also seized Big-leafed mahogany;

    —  medicines containing controlled animal and plant species associated with the use of traditional East Asian medicines;

    —  caviar.

Question (2):  Is the framework of national and European law and of international regulation robust enough to deal with wildlife crime effectively?

  6.  From Customs' perspective there are two principal legal provisions governing our activity. We consider that these provisions are sufficient and robust enough to allow us to exercise the proper level of controls. We share responsibility for a third provision with the Police.

EU REGULATION 338/97

  7.  Council Regulation 338/97 (on the Protection of Species of Wild Fauna and Flora by Regulating Trade Therein) imposes import and export controls throughout the European Union on all species (and their parts and derivatives) set out in the CITES appendices. It also imposes controls on some additional species that have been determined to require similar levels of control, including invasive non-native species.

  8.  The species covered by the EU Regulation are set out in four annexes to the Regulation:

  Annex A  All CITES Appendix I species; some CITES Appendix II and III species for which the Community has adopted stricter domestic measures; and some non-CITES species.

  Annex B  All other CITES Appendix II species; some CITES Appendix III species; and some non-CITES species.

  Annex C  Most CITES Appendix III species.

  Annex D  Some CITES Appendix III species for which the Community holds a reservation; and some non-CITES species.

  9.  Any species in these annexes may only be imported from or exported to third countries if the correct permits or other documentation are presented to Customs at the time of arrival or departure at the EU frontier. Many imports involving the more endangered species also require a valid export permit issued by the appropriate authority in the country of origin or the country of re-export.

  10.  The Regulation enables Customs to treat as a controlled item any product whose labelling or other papers claim that it contains any part of an endangered species, without having to employ scientific analysis to determine that the item is actually present. This assists in the control of those traditional East Asian medicines that purport to contain species such as tiger, bear and leopard.

  11.  We are occasionally involved in action against CITES goods arriving from other EU member states—which is otherwise a matter for the Police. We intervene when there is no way of legally importing those goods from outside the EU. We then use Regulation 5 of Control of Trade in Endangered Species (Enforcement) Regulations 1997 (COTES) to seize the goods, with prosecution being brought under CEMA where we can prove that the goods were smuggled into the EU (albeit through another member state).

CUSTOMS AND EXCISE MANAGEMENT ACT 1979

  12.  General Customs requirements in relation to imports and exports are common throughout the EU and are set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code. Customs enforcement powers are mainly derived from the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (CEMA), which sets out the principal offences and sanctions in the event of an illegal import or export. The most relevant provisions are:

  Section 49:  makes imported prohibited and restricted goods liable to forfeiture;

  Section 68:  makes prohibited and restricted goods at export liable to forfeiture, and creates offences in relation to their export;

  Section 139:  powers to detain or seize goods liable to forfeiture;

  Section 141:  powers to seize goods packed or found with goods liable to seizure;

  Section 167:  offences in relation to false or reckless declarations or documents;

  Section 170:  offences in relation to the import of prohibited and restricted goods.

  13.  Customs have powers to restore seized goods on terms determined by the Commissioners of Customs and Excise. Persons convicted on indictment of being knowingly concerned in the smuggling of CITES-listed endangered species are liable to a penalty of up to seven years imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.

  14.  In appropriate cases we have also made use of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 enabling a court to issue a confiscation order for monetary assets earned through criminal activity. In order to do so, we need to establish on balance of probability the amounts of money gained by such unlawful activity rather than legitimate activities.

Question (3):  Do responsible bodies who deal with this type of crime have sufficient resources and powers to do so? Do they treat wildlife crime with proper and due gravity?

Customs Approach

  15.  Customs apply checks on a risk-assessed and targeted basis in relation to all prohibitions and restrictions that we enforce at the frontier. The main endangered species risks concern smuggling, misdescription as non-endangered species, and the use of false or inaccurate permits (for example, excess of numbers specified on permits or breaches of the stipulated conditions). Our objectives are to:

    —  ensure that prohibited goods (particularly Annex A listed species without permits) are detected and seized on entering the UK;

    —  ensure that restricted goods (ie other Annex species) are identified on entering or leaving the UK and, if not accompanied by a valid permit, are detained and seized as appropriate; and

    —  maximise the deterrent effect by confiscation and prosecution together with appropriate publicity.

  16.  We discharge our role by:

    —  using our computerised import and export freight systems to highlight if controlled species or their parts or derivatives are being traded commercially;

    —  profiling and targeting unlicensed shipments of controlled species;

    —  detecting unlicensed goods and seizing where warranted and seizing smuggled goods;

    —  dealing with claims against forfeiture, only restoring seized goods in those cases where valid permits are obtained and presented; confiscation in itself can be effective since in many cases, in addition to the cost, endangered specimens are highly prized and difficult to replace;

    —  detecting illegal goods in transit to other EU member states or third countries and taking enforcement action or arranging controlled deliveries if requested by the appropriate enforcement authorities of the intended country of destination;

    —  considering for investigation and prosecution cases involving the commercial use of endangered species listed in Annexes A or B, or in circumstances where a deliberate or organised attempt has been made to evade or breach the regulations for commercial gain;

    —  providing intelligence to NWCIU with our CITES Intelligence staff acting as a point of contact for information and intelligence from Defra, NWCIU and NGOs such as TRAFFIC; and working up packages from information received to enable detections to be made or past breaches prosecuted;

    —  disposing of seized goods—any live specimens are, subject to health requirements, found the most suitable homes with zoos, bird parks or specialist keepers, and confiscated parts and derivatives are either destroyed or donated to museums, zoos etc for scientific or educational use; and

    —  working with Defra and NGOs such as WWF and others to raise public awareness of the controls through participating in joint media events.

  17.  Identification of species can be highly complex and the presence of some fauna, especially if live, can pose a number of practical problems. We have developed a specialised training package dealing with key issues such as species identification and the safe handling of live specimens. We also developed, in partnership with a private contractor, a species identification CD-Rom, called "Green Parrot", which contains high quality images of species and derivatives with diagnostic features highlighted to assist identification. This is also in use by a number of other agencies.

Customs' Resources

  18.  Customs' objectives and the Government's key priorities are set out in our Public Service Agreement. The two main objectives are to collect the right revenue at the right time from indirect taxes, and to reduce crime and dependency by detecting and deterring the smuggling of illegal drugs and other prohibited and restricted goods.

  19.  To do this HM Customs & Excise is organised into two main areas of activity: Business Services and Taxes (BST) and Law Enforcement (LE). It is Customs LE that combats revenue evasion and the smuggling of a wide range of prohibitions and restrictions, and maintains frontier security.

  20.  To fulfil these law enforcement responsibilities, Customs deploy resources across the UK on an intelligence-led, flexible and mobile basis. Experience demonstrates that fixed teams of officers at every port and airport, on routine duty patterns, are not the most efficient or effective way to tackle modern smuggling. Flexible mobile teams allow Customs to deploy in larger numbers, less predictably and with greater impact, to any area of the UK, wherever intelligence identifies a risk. This makes things much more difficult for the smugglers, who are less able to know what to expect.

  21.  All front-line Customs staff dealing with imports and exports include CITES restrictions among their responsibilities and are provided with guidance on how to tackle a detection involving a CITES-listed item.

  22.  Customs established a dedicated specialist CITES Enforcement Team (CET) at Heathrow Airport in 1992. This team co-ordinates and undertakes profiling and enforcement action, providing technical advice to other Customs staff and to police and NWCIU on a 24-hour basis. It has now developed considerable expertise in this field and takes the lead on a number of the activities set out in this memorandum.

  23.  Customs also have dedicated intelligence and investigation officers who have built up expertise in CITES regulations. Criminal investigations in CITES cases often pose a number of complex practical problems.

  24.  Customs have brought together CITES intelligence activity in the Customs Intelligence and Research Team (CIRT) who ensure that intelligence is received and co-ordinated in one place. Their role is to progress and disseminate intelligence appropriately, working closely with the CITES Enforcement Team and police, NWCIU and other internal and external parties as each case requires. Prior to this, intelligence co-ordination was the responsibility of a small network of CITES Wildlife and Endangered Species Officers (CWESOs), based in each of our regions. Current arrangements allow for more efficient links between the CITES Enforcement Team, CIRT, the remaining CWESOs who act in an anti-smuggling role and our enforcement partners.

  25.  Customs have worked closely with NWCIU since its inception and have made a significant contribution to their intelligence packages. We have agreed to pilot the secondment of an intelligence officer to the unit who will take up post shortly.

Question (4):  Is there sufficient dialogue and co-operation across Government and amongst the various bodies responsible for dealing with this type of crime?

  26.  Customs play an active role in PAW, the Partnership for Action against Wildlife Crime, in a number of ways. CITES training is delivered to Customs staff jointly with the Police. Our CET have worked in partnership with the Royal Botanical Gardens to produce enforcement material to aid capacity building in other agencies and countries. We have contributed to PAW publications such as the Guide to Combating Wildlife Crime. As members of its Steering Group we have been able to work closely with PAW partners such as Defra, ACPO, RSPB and TRAFFIC in a number of areas to ensure that enforcement is joined up. We are also actively involved in several of the PAW Sub Groups working on publicity, training and improved enforcement. Active involvement in PAW has built on years of already effective links with groups such as the RSPB and TRAFFIC, who have on occasion been directly involved in supporting our enforcement staff in dealing with the smuggling of wildlife.

  27.  Customs have also made our specialist training and awareness raising material available to other Customs authorities either directly or as part of initiatives led by the World Customs Organisation or TRAFFIC. We have provided input into training workshops in several overseas countries, most recently in Slovenia, Poland and Estonia. We made a major contribution in developing the Traditional East Asian Medicine Guide for Enforcers, on behalf of the CITES Secretariat.

  28.  At operational levels we have developed close links with Police Wildlife Crime Officers (PWCOs), enhanced through contact at PAW events and our annual joint conference. We look to identify enforcement projects involving serious offences and which would benefit by being tackled jointly. Where there is any likelihood of a Customs interest in a police case we provide advice and attend the enquiry if it is appropriate. CET regularly provide advice to PWCOs on species identification, legislation, confiscation and disposal of live animals. Our intelligence team ensures that all relevant information is made available to NWCIU, who act as a conduit for information received from regional police forces and others. We also liaise with the CITES team at the European Commission's anti-fraud unit, OLAF, who forward any relevant intelligence received from other Member States.

June 2004



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 7 October 2004