Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


APPENDIX 2

Memorandum from the Association for the Conservation of Energy

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  The Association for the Conservation of Energy is a lobbying, campaigning and policy research organisation, and has worked in the field of energy efficiency since 1981. Our lobbying and campaigning work represents the interests of our membership: major manufacturers and distributors of energy saving equipment in the United Kingdom. Our policy research is funded independently, and is focused on four key themes: policies and programmes to encourage increased energy efficiency; the environmental benefits of increased energy efficiency; the social impacts of energy use and of investment in energy efficiency measures; and organisational roles in the process of implementing energy efficiency policy.

  1.2  We welcome this opportunity to engage in a vital debate on the framework and effectiveness of the Government's Sustainable Development Strategy, which we believe must include a headline indicator for energy use—including energy conservation, production and consumption. We hope that full use is made of the chance to amend the Strategy in order to set the UK on a course towards a sustainable system for the delivery of energy services and resource use.

2.  GENERAL COMMENTS

  2.1  We suggest that the overriding objective of a Sustainable Development Strategy should be the reduction of national carbon emissions and the delivery of an inclusive society that facilitates sustainable patterns of investment, design, production and consumption and assists in elimination of all forms of poverty. The delivery of energy services in an economically, environmentally and socially sustainable way should be a vital part of this more overriding Strategy. We expect that environmental objectives and security of supply will be central to energy policy for the foreseeable future. However, this does not need to be at the expense of economic and social objectives, since the wide range of options available to us should allow all to be taken into consideration.

  2.2  Energy use is linked to all four key objectives and to several other headline indicators in the Strategy, such as poverty, health, housing, climate change, transport. Given the significant contribution that energy efficiency can make to the reduction of fuel poverty and carbon dioxide emissions, it should play a key part in the delivery of sustainable development. Thus, an energy headline indicator within an overall Strategy should aim to guarantee a secure supply of energy to households and businesses at the lowest economic cost consistent with high environmental objectives, to meet international targets for greenhouse gas emissions reductions, and the social objectives of community health/wellbeing and the reduction of fuel poverty. We believe that there is no inevitable growth in the amount of energy we use. It is possible to enjoy substantial growth in prosperity, which is sufficiently resource-efficient to ensure decreasing fuel usage. Energy efficiency can significantly reduce the environmental impact of energy production and use, while enhancing energy security by reducing the need for energy imports and allowing businesses and households to meet energy service needs with a lower basic energy input.

  2.3  The Government has declared that it wishes to double the average rate of improvement over the past 30 years in energy intensity of 1.8% pa. Most of these gains occurred during the 1970s and early 1980s; during the 1990s progress slowed, and in some years completely reversed. We endorse the Government's targets. But we are convinced that these can never be achieved without radical improvements to existing policies. All forms of energy generation have both ecological impacts and significant capital costs—it is therefore in the UK's overall economic interest to minimise energy wastage.

  2.4  As the present Government Departmental division of responsibilities is based on the separate supply of energy and energy-using equipment, we believe that the present system is inadequate to meet the policy challenges ahead. A framework is needed which allows the clear identification of required energy services together with the most economic and socially acceptable means to deliver them. This means that energy users have to become the focus of energy policy, not energy producers and suppliers or narrowly defined "market mechanisms". Consumers (domestic, commercial and industrial) are not interested in buying units of power, but in light, heat and motive power that enables them to achieve their objectives.

  2.5  Within an energy use headline indicator, we would support strongly the development of energy efficiency targets for each sector of the economy. Not only do these provide clarity in the evaluation of policy effectiveness, they also give a degree of certainty for the energy efficiency supply industries: if a step change in energy efficiency is to be achieved, the industries involved will have to invest to expand, and to do this they need to be sure that increases in policy-led activity in the market will be sustained.

  2.6  The cost-effective potential for additional energy efficiency improvements remains large, which is in itself evidence that additional policy activity is required to achieve the required step change in the energy efficiency of all sectors of the economy. At present both gas and electricity companies deliver mandated energy efficiency measures to domestic customers at an average cost of 1-1.5 pence per kWh saved; these schemes do not even incorporate all the potential savings at this average cost because they are limited in size or use artificial pay-back periods. But the cost to the customer of purchasing fuel is at present nearer 7 pence per kWh. For the customer it remains more cost-effective for every energy efficiency measure that costs up to 7 pence per kWh to be installed. This emphasises the need to take account of investment now on long term cost savings, just as the lifetime costs of energy generation need to be taken into account in scenarios involving additional generation capacity.

  2.7  We would also recommend that an energy indicator be included within the Strategy in order to require a step change in the use of energy within the Government estate. To date, no legislation (whether the Sustainable Energy Act or Energy Bill) has included targets for energy efficiency within the Government estate, which would constitute a significant example of encouragement to the energy efficiency industries, to householders and businesses.

  2.8  In terms of energy efficiency, the Strategy has delivered very little in terms of progress and it has taken the Energy White Paper and continuous pressure to firm up its aspirations to real Government commitments or targets, and legislative instruments (Sustainable Energy Act) to achieve some progress towards the step change required to deliver the carbon savings from energy efficiency anticipated by the Energy White Paper. The industry has received a significant blow in the scaling down of that commitment from 5 million tonnes of carbon to 4.2 MtC in the recent Energy Efficiency Implementation Plan. A stronger Strategy with an energy headline indicator might have been helpful at this time. A truly sustainable policy must have at its heart a target for the achievement of 5 megatonnes of annual carbon savings from household energy efficiency per annum by 2010, and a further 4-6 MtC p.a. by 2020 (as originally envisaged by the Energy White Paper).

  2.9  The prioritisation of energy use and consumption is of particular significance in achieving the behavioural change required in order to reach more sustainable patterns of consumption. It is the individual householder, landlord or business that needs the fiscal incentives and public awareness campaign in order to make sustainable energy purchasing choices, whether in the insulating materials they buy, supplier they use, and micro-generated energy that they may be able to produce independently. Sustainable consumption relates as much to the energy service offered by the supplier, as to the nature of the demands of the energy user.

May 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 8 November 2004