Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Environment Agency (E5)

1.  SUMMARY

  There are a number of learning points that have arisen from the work undertaken in implementing the End of Life Vehicles and Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directives. A number of lessons learnt from the implementation of the End of Life Vehicles Directive have been taken forward in the work programme for the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive.

    —  There is a need for a clear documented transposition and implementation timetable as early as possible in the regulatory development process. This has to be updated as required.

    —  One Department should take the overall lead in managing the transposition process. Ideally this should be within a project-based framework.

    —  New Directives should be implemented in a way that harmonises with existing regimes and takes full account of the modernising regulatory approaches being developed by Defra and the Agency.

    —  An assessment of all the potential impacts arising from the implementation of a Directive is needed to ensure that unintended consequences are minimised and that the cumulative impacts of different Directives are understood.

    —  These Directives have required further negotiation to resolve outstanding issues. This has caused uncertainty in the planning and implementation process.

    —  The Agency would welcome the opportunity, in a structured way, to become more directly involved in the negotiation of key Directives. This was also recommended by the Better Regulation Taskforce's report "Environmental Regulation getting the message across".

2.  INTRODUCTION

  2.1  The Environment Agency ("the Agency") welcomes the opportunity to submit evidence to the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee's Inquiry into the Government's preparations for the implementation of the End-of-Life Vehicles Directive (2000/53/EC) and the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (2002/96/EC).

  2.2  The transposition of both Directives will give rise to new duties for the Agency. In particular we will have responsibility for: regulating storage sites and treatment facilities for both End of Life Vehicles (ELVs) and Waste Electrical and Electrical Equipment (WEEE) monitoring and enforcement of those sites to ensure compliance, and monitoring and enforcement of non-permitted sites.

  2.3  There are other duties, which may fall to the Agency under both Directives but as yet these are unclear. For example, registering producers, importers and compliance schemes for producer responsibility obligations and also for auditing achievement of recovery and recycling obligations of producers under both the ELV and WEEE Regulations. These are important aspects of the Directive and accountability and resources for these needs to be determined.

  2.4  From the Agency's experience there are four main issues which need to be considered in the implementation of these two Directives:

    —  a clear timetable for transposition and implementation which is kept up to date;

    —  one Department should take the overall lead in managing the transposition process, ideally within a project-based framework;

    —  new regimes need to be implemented in a way that harmonises with existing ones and that takes full account of the modernising regulatory approaches being developed by Defra and the Agency; and

    —  an assessment of all the potential impacts arising from the implementation process is needed to ensure that unintended consequences are minimised and that the cumulative impacts of different Directives are understood.

  2.5  The implementation of the WEEE Directive is benefiting from the lessons learnt from the ELV Directive work.

THE END OF LIFE VEHICLES DIRECTIVE

  3.1  The End of Life Vehicles Directive was published in September 2000 and should have been transposed in the UK by 21 April 2002. The Directive was incomplete at the time of publication.

  3.2  Several key implementation issues remain unresolved. These include:

    —  the extent to which producers will be responsible for the costs of treating End of Life Vehicles from January 2007;

    —  demonstration of recovery and recycling targets by producers from 2006; and

    —  requirements for issuing Certificates of Destruction (CoD) by Authorised Treatment Facilities.

  3.3  The DTI has overall responsibility for the Directive's transposition, whilst Defra had specific responsibility for developing the Regulations for permitting of Authorised Treatment Facilities.

  3.4  The delays in transposing the Directive have caused the Agency significant difficulties in planning and preparing for the permitting and other workloads associated with this legislation. The Agency's role in respect of the Producer Responsibility aspects remains uncertain.

  3.5  There is a need for a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of both DTi and Defra in terms of overall lead, co-ordination and individual work terms.

  3.6  The need for good co-ordination can be exemplified by the work on Certificates of Destruction (CoD). Certificates of Destruction can only be issued by Authorised Treatment Facilities permitted by the Environment Agencies. Whilst the permitting aspects of the Directive have been led by Defra, the Certificates of Destruction system, which will be managed by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), has been led by the DTI.

  3.7  It now appears that there will be two sets of regulations: the first for permitting of Authorised Treatment Facilities and covering the restriction of heavy metals in the manufacturing of motor vehicles and the second will cover producer responsibility requirements, including recovery and recycling targets. The consultation paper covering the second set of regulations has yet to be issued by the DTI.

  3.8  For the End of Life Vehicles Directive, the first tranche of Regulations are expected to be in place by the end of October 2003. These will require the permitting, by 31 March 2004, of about 1,500 existing "exempt" sites. Implementing a new regime to this timescale will have an impact on existing Agency operational work. It is only recently that Government has agreed the permitting approach.

  3.9  Un-de-polluted End of Life Vehicles are classified as hazardous waste under the European Waste Catalogue (EWC). Technical guidance on the removal of fluids and components to render an End of Life Vehicle non-hazardous has been developed through a joint Government/Agency project but the status of that guidance is still to be agreed.

  3.10  The Government took an early decision to make last owners take on the costs of End of Life Vehicle de-pollution until 2007. In its response to the Government's first consultation on the implementation of the End of Life Vehicles Directive in 2001, the Agency warned of the potential consequences of this policy. Because last owners will take on the costs of de-pollution the temptation to abandon those vehicles will be even greater than at the present time. At present, of the UK total of two million End of Life Vehicles processed through vehicle dismantling operators and scrap metal shredders each year, 300,000 will have been abandoned.

  3.11  Alternative options available to offset the costs of de-pollution and limit the potential for last owners to abandon their End of Life Vehicles, through subsidised or fully funded disposal or take back schemes which could include: funding from Government, through the purchase price of new vehicles or higher vehicle excise duty.

4.  THE WASTE ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT DIRECTIVE

  4.1  The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive was published in February 2003 and should be transposed into domestic legislation by 13 August 2004.

  4.2  The Agency has been encouraged by the project-based approach to the transposition of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive that has been adopted by Government. A number of lessons have been learned from implementation of the End of Life Vehicles Directive.

  4.3  The DTI has taken the overall lead on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment and developed a comprehensive planning framework. A policy manager and policy advisor from the Agency are represented on the core implementation team, which comprises staff from the DTI, Defra and the Environment Agencies. Members of the team underwent joint project-management training early in 2003.

  4.4  The core implementation team was responsible for the production of the initial discussion paper issued in March 2003, is now developing the consultation paper due to be issued in November 2003 and the draft Regulations in spring 2004. The project team is supported by a wider Advisory Group representing other Government Departments.

  4.5  To date, each of the key milestones in the project plan have been reached on time.

  4.6  Defra has timed its broader waste permitting review to meet the permitting requirements of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. The Agency is working closely with Defra on this review that aims to deliver a more responsive and proportionate permitting regime. We strongly support this initiative and have seconded two members of staff to work with colleagues at Defra. We are hopeful that the review will fully inform the permitting arrangements for sites handling Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment.

  4.7  Stakeholder forums were established and over 30 seminars were organised throughout the UK prior to the publication of the Directive. The three-stage consultation strategy and the provision of up-to-date information on the DTI's website have helped to raise awareness of the Directive's requirements and the various implementation options. A communications strategy has been developed and guides to the Directive are being prepared to promote understanding amongst affected businesses and to maximise participation in the consultation process.

  4.8  A number of difficult issues still need to be resolved with the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. For example there are no de minimis provisions in respect of producers and taken literally, the Directive requirements could extend to petrol driven lawn mowers, musical greeting cards and gas cookers.

  4.9  Article 9 is being renegotiated, reporting requirements have yet to be clarified and the scope of the Directive is still being evaluated by the Technical Adaptation Committee. The DTI is leading in trying to resolve these issues at a European level.

  4.10  Another issue still to be resolved is the standard to which Authorised Treatment Facilities processing Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment should be working by 2005. Industry is seeking clarification on whether the various operations and treatments required under the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive can be undertaken after specialist shredding or whether more manual handling and therefore more costly preparation of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment will be demanded, as appears to be required under the Directive.

October 2003





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 20 February 2004