Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Nineteenth Report


5  LONG-TERM ISSUES

32. Ofwat intends to evaluate its approach to this price review with its stakeholders in the New Year. It will publish the results of the evaluation and says that the findings will inform its planning of the next price review in 2009. One of the issues that it will consider is whether the five year review cycle is the right length. Ofwat told us that there was a balance to be struck between the need to take account of the long-term investment required and the uncertainties in costs that are apparent even in a five year cycle.[42]

33. In our first report we expressed concern about the ability of the five year price review system to allow for long-term investment, particularly that needed to meet the challenges of climate change and the requirements of the Water Framework Directive.[43] Water companies are required to make 25 year resource plans and this is one way in which long term issues can be considered.[44] We are still concerned that the five year cycle will tend to delay expenditure until the problems become urgent. We recommend that Ofwat, the water companies and the Government use the opportunity of Ofwat's evaluation of the price review process to assess the long-term risks and challenges that the water industry faces and report back to us on how coping with these risks will be funded.


42   Q1 Back

43   HC (2003-04)121, para 15 Back

44   Q1 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 1 December 2004