Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Annex I

Future Obligations of the Water Framework Directive

  WFD requires all inland surface and coastal waters and groundwaters to reach "good status" by 2015. Specific quality criteria have yet to be set but the Directive will set demanding environmental objectives, including ecological targets, to be met by 2015.

  Article 9 of the Directive aims to ensure that pricing policies improve the sustainability of water resources and requires water pricing policies to perform the following functions by December 2010:

    —  Take account of the principle of the recovery of costs of water services, including environmental and resource costs.

    —  Embody the "polluter pays" principle.

    —  Provide adequate incentives to use water resources efficiently.

    —  Ensure that water use groups (separated into at least industry, households and agriculture) make an adequate contribution to the recovery of the costs of water services.

  Article 11 requires a series of measures to be in place to meet the environmental objectives in article 4 of the Directive. Generally we already have many of the statutory measures in place that are necessary to deliver what the Directive requires. This includes the current discharge consent system. The more demanding and wide-ranging water quality objectives in the Directive mean, however, that many existing consents will need to be reviewed. Some minor changes will be needed to the current arrangements for licensing abstraction of water, in addition to proposed measures contained in the Water Bill.

  As part of implementation, the Government also proposes to introduce a new power to control sources of diffuse pollution, to the extent that controls are needed to meet the river basin water quality objectives of the Directive.

  For point sources, water and sewerage undertakers would be directly responsible for meeting the costs of improvements to their point source discharges and would be likely to contribute a large share of the measures to improve river habitats and to alleviate low flows. The costs of improving other point source discharges would be the responsibility of the industries concerned; but they might meet some of this cost by paying increased trade effluent charges to undertakers.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 18 December 2003