Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Family Farmers' Association

AGRICULTURE AND EU ENLARGEMENT

  1.  Our committee does not have any expertise on the situation in the accession states. One of our number (Michael Hart) has been in Poland several times and has confirmed the general impression given in the media. This is of a great variation within the state, from subsistence farming on the one hand to extremely large farms on the other. This is said to be the case in the other states, but Poland is expected to pose the greatest problems because of the huge number of farmers there. The large farms may or may not be organised on modern, efficient lines. We look forward with great interest to reading your report for a definitive view of "the current state of agricultural production"!

  2.  It seems highly probable that attempting to operate the CAP in the accession states will lead to many complications and possibly great hardship for the smaller, peasant type farmers, it has been officially stated that a great many of them—perhaps a million—will have to go. Where to? Likewise the ancillary industries. Michael cited a present figure of 4,200 abattoirs. Presumably EU regulations will make most of them uneconomic. But if abattoirs become few and far between, as in England, how will the animals get to them? Now a large proportion of them simply walk there. Has the EU worked this one out? It is but one example of the complications that will arise.

  3.  In a nutshell, it appears that enormous areas of farming will have to undergo more or less instantaneously the evolutionary process that has taken us 50 years or more, Is this possible? (None of us has been asked if it is desirable' it is said that the farmers were the people least keen on joining the EU.)

  4.  As for the impact on the agricultural markets, if this could be foretold, no doubt clever traders would make fortunes. It is the business of governments of all ranks to be optimistic and tell us that all will be for the best. But farmers who are not of a size to be expecting handsome pensions from their decoupled payments are extremely worried that the new states will be sending us agricultural produce at a price below our cost of production. We will not only face competition from the unregulated produce of South America, and other places, but there may be increasing competition from just across the channel.

  5.  Also we cannot help but be sympathetic with farmers used to a simple cash economy having to cope with EU regulations. In particular, registering all their calves within 27 days of birth! Are their cattle numbered? Do they already have movement records or will that be another thing they have to learn? Will arrangements be made to pay subsidies in cash to those who do not have bank accounts? On what records will subsidy payments be made? Will the sanction for non compliance with regulations simply be the withholding of subsidies—which they are not used to anyway—or will they be fined?

  6.  You have taken on a mammoth task if you hope to find out what is actually going to happen in the 10 states and how it will affect European agriculture as a whole.

The Family Farmers' Association

January 2004


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 22 October 2004